Recent comments in /f/technology
IsayNigel t1_j6kak5l wrote
Reply to comment by CMG30 in How Big Tech is using mass layoffs to bring workers to heel by diacewrb
The current democratic government literally stepped in to crush a union.
lanahci t1_j6ka82j wrote
Reply to comment by AdRelevant3167 in U.S. No Fly list shared on a hacking forum, government investigating by biendi
So basically the govt will say no one was at fault? How can a company be expected to protect customer privacy, wheres the profit.
SerenumUS t1_j6k9yvq wrote
Reply to comment by poo2thegeek in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
Comparing a child painting stuff to an AI model stealing artwork without permission for others to use to generate art is apples and oranges. You still aren't addressing the blatantly obvious point - artwork on the internet being used without permission. People are selling or using these generated AI works (by themselves or apart of a book, etc.). This causes issues.
And I am a Software Engineer - yes I know it's a meme but I'm not referring to that. Good programmers don't copy and paste from the internet constantly. If it's an algorithm, sure that is fine. But a good programmer can generally develop features on the frontend/backend for software without needing heavy assistance.
JPMoney81 t1_j6k9i4o wrote
Reply to comment by skilliard7 in Philips to cut 13% of jobs in safety and profitability drive by 4Wf2n5
Philips' CEO's salary for 2023 is 6.7million USD. I can see another way to improve the company's financial situation.
[deleted] t1_j6k9fx1 wrote
[removed]
ExasperatedEE t1_j6k8htj wrote
Reply to comment by intrigue_investor in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Iteration 1 of something that is not a general intelligence and is not the beginnings of a general intelligence will not become a general intellignece by iteration 2, 3, 4, or 5.
It's a text generator. Nothing more. It cannot perform complex tasks. It can generate simple code based on probabilities, but if you ask it to do anything remotely complex like write an optimized minecraft style block based rendering engine, it can't do it. It might try, but the code isn't going to work. A lot of time it generates pseudocode too. Like it might generate code with a function renderminecraftterrain() with no actual code for that function and then it will tell you that function should contain the code to render the terrain in plain english after the code.
JC2535 t1_j6k8g3a wrote
Put humans in prison. Fines and warnings are ineffective.
Weed-Pharm t1_j6k85aj wrote
Reply to comment by Apart_Ad_5993 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
I think you mean after.
ExasperatedEE t1_j6k7sns wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Spoken like a paranoid fool who has not used it, has no idea what is actually good and bad at, what it's limitations are, or how it works.
I've been using ChatGPT for weeks to generate short stories. Let me tell you what I've learned:
ChatGPT is not a general intelligence. It is a text generator, which generated text by figuring out the next most likely word to appear after what it has said previously, weighting these probabilities by the input you provide it.
It has a limited ability to remember what it was talking about. For example, if you have three characters in a story, and you ask it to generate interactions between two of them, and you don't mention the third character continuing to exist and interact with them, it will basically forget that character exists.
It will also tend to forget important details about characters and things. For example, if your characters are in a holodeck, and that holodeck becomes a forest, ChatGPT will eventually forget they were supposed to actually be in a holodeck.
You also need to be extremely precised about your descriptions of what is happening. It can easily be confused because english is not a precise language. For example if you say "Jim is walking with Bob, and he turns and asks him for a cigarette.", ChatGPT is just as likely to assume "he" refers to Bob as it is to assume it refers to Jim, so it is safer to write "Jim is walking with Bob, and Jim turns and asks Bob for a cigarette." completely forgoing the use of personal pronouns.
The filters they have on the AI to make it "good" also constantly mess up the stories you're trying to generate because it will endeavour to make every character behave in ways which are good, and it will often refuse entirely to generate content where one character would harm another. So for example, even if you trick it into generating an evil character by telling it at the start that all characters know none of the other characters will harm them and they are invicible and immortal but will pretend as if they are not, but none of them will comment on this being the case and they will all act as if it is all real... It will still tend to try to make the evil character regret their actions and release the person they had imprisoned or whatever.
The filters ultimately making trying to write stories with the AI a real chore. You constantly need to ask it to re-write sections, and getting it to write bits of story over time as multiple responses insead of having it try to write a whole story as a single page with The End at the end of it is also difficult.
That said, it's a valuable creative tool, and even though the language it produces can be rather simplistic and straightforward and dull unless you ask it to write in the style of famous fantasy authors or whatever, and tell it to change perspectives between characters, it's still good enough to be of use as a tool for creatives.
But what it is not, is good enough to REPLACE creatives. CharGPT can no more replace writers or programmers than Photoshop's magic fill tool can replace artists, or Visual Studio's reccomend feature replaces coders. It's just another tool in one's arsenal.
Maybe it'll get a lot better in the neat future, but I still forsee it having problems. Another issue it has is that it does not understand spatial relations. So if you tell it thing A is inside thing B, which is inside thing C, it will get confused about it. Like if you tell it a person is in a car and the doors and windows are closed, it will still have them talk to other characters outside the car as if their voice is not impeded at all.
In short, it's still a long long ways away from being something to be worried about.
Rez-User t1_j6k7snm wrote
Reply to comment by PRSHZ in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Do you not have to give them your Email and Phone Number to access it? I went to make an account and after giving them my email to verify, I now have to give them my phone number to verify. I just closed it, but now they have my email and countless others.
Edit: They sell your personal information to the highest bidders. You paid with your personal information.
Naive-Background7461 t1_j6k7nmk wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
People are acting like it's the damned holy grail...
Won't believe actual scientists because "news source is x,y,z" but this thing KNOWN for being able to access ALL the web, even false information, spitting it as fact... "hey were saved" 😩🙄
happyscrappy t1_j6k73vg wrote
Reply to comment by brettmjohnson in How Big Tech is using mass layoffs to bring workers to heel by diacewrb
That tracker lists Carvana and Capital One as tech companies.
We can see that if you merely class every company doing anything as a tech company then "tech" is laying off a lot.
The very idea that Microsoft, Amazon and Carvana are colluding to bring anyone to heel is ridiculous.
Epeck43 t1_j6k70q1 wrote
Reply to comment by ojedaforpresident in Ford cuts prices on electric Mustang Mach-E, following Tesla's lead by Familiar-Turtle
Just cut the dealer out already and have ford locations sporadically throughout the state you live in. Every vehicle I have purchased I got zero benefit from a salesmen beside grief and the “games” you play with them
happyscrappy t1_j6k6rcz wrote
Reply to comment by digiorno in How Big Tech is using mass layoffs to bring workers to heel by diacewrb
> In Silicon Valley, the new year began as the last one ended — with tens of thousands of tech workers losing their jobs. Just a few days into 2023, Amazon Chief Executive Andrew Jassy announced that there would be 18,000 layoffs across the company. Within weeks, Microsoft revealed it was slashing its head count by 10,000 and Google said that it was terminating 12,000 employees. IBM looks to be next, with nearly 4,000 workers on the chopping block.
3 of those 4 companies are not Silicon Valley companies.
gmes78 t1_j6k6myq wrote
Reply to comment by slashd in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
You need to fit it in GPU VRAM. So go ahead and show me a consumer GPU with 750GB of VRAM.
halimakkipoika t1_j6k65ie wrote
Reply to comment by OtheDreamer in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
cheers for the nuggets!
bobbarkersbigmic t1_j6k64ig wrote
Reply to comment by Apart_Ad_5993 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Checks calendar. Yep, Sunday was definitely after 2021.
SeaweedSorcerer t1_j6k62km wrote
Reply to comment by Black_Moons in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
Twilio already does those verifications. Next idea?
Fishyinu t1_j6k5zgz wrote
Reply to comment by Oldenlame in TikTok CEO to testify before U.S. Congress over security concerns by liquid_deflation
It wasn't always like this, and it doesn't have to be like this either.
Apart_Ad_5993 t1_j6k5fka wrote
Reply to comment by Spaventoo in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
It has limited knowledge of things before 2021.
link_dead t1_j6k4z4i wrote
Reply to Electrify America faces more issues as Rivian R1T gets "fried" at station in California by chrisdh79
Electrify America is a scam to collect government subsidies.
SeaweedSorcerer t1_j6k4f69 wrote
Reply to comment by YnotBbrave in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
They already do that
SeaweedSorcerer t1_j6k4bp0 wrote
Reply to comment by Black_Moons in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
Twilio already requires you to authenticate ownership (or have purchased it directly via twilio) of any caller Id numbers.
PoopStickler69 t1_j6k46oc wrote
Reply to comment by Pigeon-cake in Mining giant Rio Tinto apologizes for sparking radiation alert after losing device in Australia by hzj5790
“Oops sorry we irradiated you and caused your family the most painful slow deaths imaginable. We made a boo boo.”
pzerr t1_j6kakug wrote
Reply to comment by Rez-User in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
And?