Recent comments in /f/technology
Naive-Background7461 t1_j6kfha1 wrote
Reply to comment by TheAnonFeels in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
I haven't played with it 🤷♀️ but I've seen plenty of people on reddit say it's gotten worded math problems wrong 😅
ontopofyourmom t1_j6kffm7 wrote
Reply to comment by 618smartguy in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
The innocent third parties who depend on them need time to switch to other platforms
JPMoney81 t1_j6kfc9b wrote
Reply to comment by skilliard7 in Philips to cut 13% of jobs in safety and profitability drive by 4Wf2n5
Would be a start.
ontopofyourmom t1_j6kfa0k wrote
Reply to comment by Hookstomped in FCC Threatens to Disconnect Twilio for Illegal Robocalls by BasedSweet
fucken' dirty mike
contributes_n0thing t1_j6kf6i5 wrote
cool, another car no one can afford.
[deleted] t1_j6kf2j0 wrote
Reply to comment by AtheianLibertarist in The Nothing Phone (2) will come to the US later this year by PuzzleheadedHeat4409
[removed]
TheAnonFeels t1_j6keyfl wrote
Reply to comment by Naive-Background7461 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
So if i type "Who won the 2022 midterm election in the USA" it would be able to tell me?
edit: OpenAI
AadamAtomic t1_j6kev0h wrote
Reply to comment by Loud-Path in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
>The bank I work for has 49% owned by a single person, guess what, even though he is not a majority stock holder he is considered the owner as he can easily get 2% of other people's votes to go his way.
Sounds like a shit bank where the guy literally cannot leave without destroying them. If he dies, and the engeratance is split up that bank is out of business. Lol
>The amount is not relevant.
Goes on a random tangent about how much some Rando person has in a bank*
ExasperatedEE t1_j6keh1v wrote
Reply to comment by TheAnonFeels in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
ChatGPT.
What do you mean when you say manipulate the whole prompt? Are they secretly adding something to the prompts when I submit the prompt through ChatGPT, that would not affect the output with the API backend?
If so, you'd think they'd tell people that if they want developers to try this out and then pay to use it!
Also, is there even a way to accesss the API version from the web, or is the only way to try that out by accessing it through code? I've seen some twitch streamers using it to make AI chat bots on their streams. Those are fun.
Sea_Tack t1_j6kebua wrote
Reply to comment by 613Rok in Ford cuts prices on electric Mustang Mach-E, following Tesla's lead by Familiar-Turtle
There are laws against Ford selling Fords directly unfortunately.
Even the Justice Department dislikes these laws but they are still on the books in almost every state.
Tesla has gotten exceptions made especially for them.
Ford needs to work on lobbying, citizens need to get awareness levels above their seat cushions, and state legislatures need to repeal the laws that require car dealers.
Prestigious_Carpet29 t1_j6ke26i wrote
Reply to comment by Prestigious_Carpet29 in Philips to cut 13% of jobs in safety and profitability drive by 4Wf2n5
They've been increasingly just trying to jump on bandwagons, rather than seek long-term innovation.
Also >15 years ago they said their target market was over-50's.
Will their target-market eventually die out?!
goomyman t1_j6kdscg wrote
Reply to comment by Fishyinu in TikTok CEO to testify before U.S. Congress over security concerns by liquid_deflation
I’m not sure it was ever not like this. I think just less publicized. I’m going to need proof here.
Also considering congress sets the rules and our political climate isn’t anything individuals have control over - only their local gerrymandered representatives - I’m going to go with we don’t control this either.
It probably was always like this and we have no ability to change it.
goomyman t1_j6kdbs9 wrote
Can we have someone with technical knowledge ask questions.
An tech illiterate 70 year olds questions can be easily ignored.
And that’s even if they take it seriously and just don’t use their time slot for a campaign ad.
noodle-face t1_j6kd4gd wrote
Reply to Banning TikTok Won’t Do Much Good by Witty-Village-2503
I'd like TikTok banned for my own sanity
Naive-Background7461 t1_j6kd0lv wrote
Reply to comment by Naive-Background7461 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
https://time.com/6246119/demis-hassabis-deepmind-interview/
"In December 2022, ChatGPT, a chatbot designed by DeepMind’s rival OpenAI, went viral for its seeming ability to write almost like a human—but faced criticism for its susceptibility to racism and misinformation."
There are other articles if you don't like the source 🙈
steviaplath153 OP t1_j6kcng5 wrote
Reply to comment by ExasperatedEE in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
You're right. It's not good enough. Doesn't mean they aren't going to try anyways.
Naive-Background7461 t1_j6kckl3 wrote
Reply to comment by TheAnonFeels in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Yes. Deepmind is building the database their AI uses based on peer reviewed scientific information.
Google's AI, OPENAI, Is named such bc it uses an open interface with all of the internet as it's guide.
Deepmind wrote an article on it that I'm sure Google suppressed so people wouldn't realize it can be wrong. 😅
[deleted] t1_j6kcdq2 wrote
[removed]
Spaventoo t1_j6kcaau wrote
Reply to comment by Apart_Ad_5993 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
I was testing if it could come up with a creative answer.
TheAnonFeels t1_j6kc2ag wrote
Reply to comment by ExasperatedEE in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Neat use, but to clarify, are you using chat.openai.com , the ChatGPT, or their API backend("Playground") that lets you manipulate the whole prompt?
skilliard7 t1_j6kbsxa wrote
Reply to comment by JPMoney81 in Philips to cut 13% of jobs in safety and profitability drive by 4Wf2n5
Philips lost $1.3 Billion USD last quarter. The CEO's salary is a drop in the bucket compared to how much they need to cut.
TheAnonFeels t1_j6kbkw5 wrote
Reply to comment by Naive-Background7461 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
They managed to get this thing to look up stuff on the internet?
azdood85 t1_j6kbcrm wrote
Reply to comment by LiberalFartsMajor in How Big Tech is using mass layoffs to bring workers to heel by diacewrb
Social Media is only amplifying the message. So many tech subs are parroting the same buzz words we see in headlines.
Meanwhile the comments are mostly "glad im safe" and "my employer has plenty of openings still"
TheAnonFeels t1_j6kb8fy wrote
Reply to comment by Weed-Pharm in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
I think they mean "It's knowledge is limited to things before 2021"
skilliard7 t1_j6kfhwa wrote
Reply to comment by JPMoney81 in Philips to cut 13% of jobs in safety and profitability drive by 4Wf2n5
$6.7 Million isn't exactly competitive for a CEO of a company of that size. If they cut their salary to $3 Million, the CEO will likely find a job elsewhere, and they'll end up needing to pay several times more to find someone qualified to run the company.