Recent comments in /f/technology

Aperron t1_j6n8wzo wrote

No, they cannot. Sometimes they can even wipe the storage using the recovery boot menu, but as soon as the device contacts apple when connected to a network it’s going to prompt for iCloud credentials and not allow any further use without them.

You clearly have zero experience in this area, this is and has been a very well known issue with iPads entering the waste stream for a very long time, and everyone involved knew it was coming to computers as well when Apple announced the T2 chip and how it was going to be integrated with activation lock.

3

MerlinsBeard t1_j6n88uw wrote

Supply and Demand. People are willing to play an inflated price-tag for them so there is no incentive to drop prices unless an external force (competitor, depression, etc) forces the drop.

From a purely materials standpoint, batteries are the issue. AFAIK, the battery alone in a Tesla is ~$13k mostly due to how expensive the materials (cobalt, nickel, lithium and manganese) are.

1

HaiKarate t1_j6n831n wrote

Wiping the drives of decommissioned laptops and PCs is an extremely LOW priority for large enterprise IT departments. Not only have those units been depreciated on their corporate taxes, but also spending hours cleaning them up to resell for pennies on the dollar is hardly worth it to a company making billions of dollars.

Apple has been dealing with corporate IT for over 4 decades and is fully aware of this process. Apple even has their own large enterprise IT department, and experiences this, too.

8

Aperron t1_j6n7zr7 wrote

Apple already has a database matching devices with their iCloud email addresses that were used, that’s why it’s possible to log in and release the lock on your own devices.

All they need to do is have a web portal where a recycler can submit a list of serials for hardware they have, push an email or notification to the registered account and check if it’s been marked stolen using FindMy and allow an unlock and wipe if everything checks out after a set period of time.

1

Aperron t1_j6n7hwv wrote

That’s all well and good, but doesn’t change the fact that these perfectly reusable devices are already accumulating and will continue to accumulate in ever increasing mass quantities at recycling depots across the country where there is no possibility to do the ecologically and socially responsible thing and ensure they get a second life as a usable device for someone who isn’t suited to buy brand new.

Rendering mass quantities of usable equipment as at best a token fraction of its raw input material cannot be allowed to be classified as a sustainable practice. Any sustainability labels or accreditations need to be removed from both Apple and any enterprises that demand destruction of depreciated assets if that is to continue. Cut the greenwashing, call it what it is.

−2

SezitLykItiz t1_j6n77qk wrote

I can't believe you're serious right now. You're saying Apple should keep a database on when each computer was locked, and after a certain point automatically erase and unlock that computer.

For all we know the computer would have been in use the whole time and just not connected to the internet. I myself have a computer that's in my storage for one year and I don't want anyone touching it/erasing it. Yes I have back ups but I still dont want that.

0

AlphaTangoFoxtrt t1_j6n6znb wrote

You cant stop it, but you can make it more expensive.

Instead of buying the chips directly China has to set up, or go through intermediaries.

This adds overhead costs and risks. If they get the chips through a Vietnamese intermediary, the US can pressure Vietnam to shut it down or risk being sanctioned as well.

1