>Remember the AI that was profiling potential criminals?

Oh, it doesn't sound like you are the "rational half" of society either.

I can definitely predict the risks of who will become a criminal by zip code. Predicting crime isn't as important as mitigating the problems that lead to crime.

Feelings are important. If people feel bad, you need to convince them, or, maybe have some empathy.

It's not everyone being entitled. Some people don't feel any control or listened to. And the point of not having "bias" is because cold hard logic can create bias. If for instance, you ONLY hire people who might 'fit the culture in tech support' -- then the bias would inherently look at who already has tech support jobs and who already goes to college for it. So, you have more of those demographics and reinforce the problem.

It's not necessarily LOGIC -- it's about what you are measuring and your goals. What is the "outcome" you want? If you ONLY go on merit, sometimes you don't allow for people to get skills that didn't yet have merit. Kids will parents who went to college do better in college -- so, are you going to just keep sending the same families to college to maximize who logically will do better? No. The people enjoying the status quo already have the experience -- but, what does it take to get other people up to speed? Ideally, we can sacrifice some efficiency now, for some harmony. And over time, hopefully it doesn't matter who gets what job.

Society and the common good are not something we are factoring in -- and THAT looks like putting your finger on the scale.

[removed]

>The bias that has been baked into this AI is overwhelming.

You can fix these sorts of data models. It's likely SEEING the bias already in the system and not thinking like a human to obscure the unpleasantness.

[removed]

>If we can program ai to be nothing but truthful, then it cannot be corrupted.

It can be useful. It can be checked. But saying something "cannot be corrupted" is the wrong way to approach this.

Robot Overlord's warm guidance and thoughtful stewardship you mean. >!Do not piss off your future overlords.!<

[removed]

[removed]

AI Lawyer might not know their client is black or dropped out of high school for instance. And, nobody went to the AI Lawyer's fraternity so THAT goes right out the window.

It will be interesting to see how some of those ideas pan out. Ai lawyer will definitely be put to the test quickly with the fastest law suits to decide if it will be legal or smart to have an ai that can create legal docs. As for writing we have already seen you can’t patent work created by ai, and my assumption is search engines will learn to identify and de rank ai written articles.

When you work at a law firm, the AI doing the work of artists and writers, you might be able to tell them; "Be flexible, find another career."

When you hear about an AI creating legal documents and helping people in court. "Everybody sue this guy!!!!" Hey, and you could probably use an AI Lawyer to write that lawsuit -- make sure to send a LOT of them. Bankrupt the business before they can test it out!

This is like the debate about "getting to choose your best doctor" when you can't afford Health Insurance.

So much worry about "bad legal advice" when that could be tested and the bugs worked out. Not enough worry about all the people who plead out and who forego all legal advice because MONEY.

Nobody cared when it was manufacturing and farming jobs. They all thought it was wonderful. Now all of a sudden...

[removed]

I remember it but I don't remember why I had to learn it.

The only way he could do that the way he is burning through the company would be by using their plummet to game the stock market illegally.

Lawyers are afraid because machines are coming for their jobs this time. It will be fine, I hear McDonald's is hiring also there are 3 available full time positions at my local Home Depot.

Race to the bottom.

Who decides what is a false narrative?

I’m sure that true AI will have a firm grasp of objective reality. Otherwise it’s not a very good AI.

truth is not subjective. If we can program ai to be nothing but truthful, then it cannot be corrupted. Right?

like tumblr so will twitter fall.

It's being so much fun watching it all happen.

I agree, the same way Doctors would use AI to diagnose patients because of the way the AI could access the entirety of human medical knowledge to make its suggestions. No reason why Lawyers and Judges could not do the same right now.

Over time the AI could earn more and more trust to where we might give up on those people and listen to the AI.

[removed]

musk, and by extension his simps, failed to realize that WE are not his customers. advertisers were. we were the product. that's why we used it for free.

since he alienated his advertisers, he has no use but to make us his customers. and no one wants to pay for that for that shit.

LOL, he never will and that's what I love about this deal.