[removed]

There will be some benefits... Even with humans making all the decisions, a legal assistant AI bot might be able to tell you what the "proper" course of action is, according to the law, and let humans leverage it for context.

An AI bot might also be able to tell you where new laws are in conflict, making it easier to keep the legal system clean(er)

You don’t think there’s an objective truth/reality?

That’s a mind blowing concept for me.

Why should I pay rent on my apartment when I’m leaving anyway?

I can’t wait for AI to be able to tell us (objectively) which humans are trash. I could be on that list.

It will help uneducated voters to never vote against their own interests again 👍🏽 the politicians of the future will literally not be able to lie, because the AI will tell us the truth.

SHOOT RED BULL DIRECTLY INTO MY VEINS UNTIL JAVASCRIPT SHOOTS OUT OF MY EYES DADDY MUSK

We are currently at a point where some a.i sexually harassing people, some a.i are vegan, some a.i are sexist ......I don't have faith in humans but like the a.i is doing a great job without sentencing people

[deleted]

Because everyone knows developers are at their best when they code non-stop for sixteen hours a day, seven days a week. I saw it on The Social Network, so it must be true.

Doubt the people remaining would say no to musk. They are also humming along by making people work longer hours. They had to sign a pledge that they would work like 80 hours a week or something.

Yes, there is only doom now.

It's just giving you a plausible and probabilistically likely answer. It has absolutely no model of what is and isn't true.

I thought Twitter went private because Musk now owns it. There is no gaming the stock price.

Paywalled API? We’ll just do it live!

Having actually worked in legal technology, I'm honestly not sure what this does for existing lawyers. As I said before, legal documents require extremely specific and precise language. Lawyers are likely to have templates for common documents their firms create, and anything beyond that requires actually knowing about law, which LLMs like ChatGPT are not capable of. The actual money to be made in legal technology is not in generative AI, but in document processing and search. Lawyers are increasingly having to deal with hundreds of gigabytes or even terabytes of documents in a given case. Ocr, which is also AI and is seeing in use in the industry, makes handwriting searchable. Advanced search techniques make legal review, the real driver of cost in the legal industry, faster and cheaper. Making legal arguments in court is not the reason why interaction with the legal system can be so expensive.

Indeed - explains how this happened too

https://mashable.com/article/twitter-data-breach-elon-musk-january-2023

They can but why the office itself is closing

Yea no the headcount there was waaaay to high. When you have people working 4 hour months you have to many people

[removed]

I asked it something today and it came back with an answer that seemed correct. I then asked for it to give me examples. It gave two examples and the way it was written seemed absolutely plausible. However I knew the examples and knew that they were wrong. It gave other examples that I couldn't verify anywhere, yet as I asked more questions it kept doubling down on the previous examples.

I won't go into detail about what I was asking, but it basically said the Nintendo logo was made up of three rings to represent three core values of the business. I went through Nintendo's logo history to see if it ever had three rings and as far I can tell it didn't. So fuck knows where it got the info from.

He offered to sell the stock instantly if the reporter could make a reasonable plan to do so

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]