The ones about which sites you have accounts on are unencrypted. Most other password managers encrypt this information.

>that results in elections being less secure.

That's their goal. Just like when they say "government doesn't work; elect me and I'll prove it to you".

There's really no reason to make something as important as voting be subject to the lax security on personal electronic devices. And we don't need it. The expansive use of mail-in voting during the COVID presidential election in 2020 is proof that measures like early voting, no-excuse vote-by-mail etc are good enough.

This is what happens when you let morons write your law.

It most certainly does not and that's the easy part. It'll take decades to get all the states to agree on a common system.

They keep voting for the same people 🤷🏻‍♂️

No ETA but probably end Feb mid March.

The last test actually failed so they have to redo it

Well that's awkward.

I35 says hell no

Shockingly, putting millions of passwords into the same place didn't turn out to be a brilliant idea.

>Not a good day for Texas taxpayers.

Has there ever been a good day for Texas taxpayers?

I think the tech exists today where we can vote from our phones, tablets and computers.

[deleted]

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 85%. (I'm a bot)

> A hacker stole a file from password manager LastPass that contained the passwords of 30 million users and 85,000 companies.

> As long as customers had a good master password, their passwords were safe, the company said.

> Unlike what many users thought, their personal password vault was not a fully encrypted folder but a text document with a few encrypted fields, according to FTM. FTM also pointed out that by still claiming that the passwords are safe if people used a good master password, LastPass is shifting the responsibility to its users.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: password^#1 hack^#2 LastPass^#3 users^#4 information^#5

LastPass won't last, everyone will give it a pass. Self fulfilling prophecy name.

Not a good day for Texas taxpayers. First they get to pay out the settlements for their corrupt AG and then this but hey you get what you vote for and you won't have to worry about voting much longer once these guys are done destroying our democoracy.

Spending money on vaporware that results in elections being less secure. Of course.

Move yourself to BitWarden or 1Password or something, these folks don’t have what it takes to keep up a good password management service now that they’re owned by a hedge fund.

God I hate my state.

[removed]

The law should be unconstitutional as interstate commerce can only be regulated by the federal government. These websites operate out of multiple states and other countries so it's certainly interstate.

So a video on YouTube on how to solve a math problem can’t be viewed by minors but the same video on a blog can?

[deleted]

>>SB 152 would require parents to provide their government-issued ID and physical address in order for their child or teenager to access social media. But even if you like those provisions, this bill would require everyone — including adults — to submit government-issued ID to sign up for a social media account, including not just sites like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, but also video sharing sites like YouTube, which is commonly used by schools.

How, exactly, will a US state restrict this law to their own borders? They can't.

follow-up story- " Surge in the VPN industry in Utah".

Yea when is launch day?