The first time you were able and I didn’t have any problem getting the second time and you had us on a roll hot 🥵 water

The new rules would be similar for a company with more money 💴 in it

[removed]

The first one ☝️ I love you too much to see it but When it was a

I’m going on the road right after work and will call when I’m back home and I can get it done for you And I’ll give them the keys 🎹 for your keys 🎹

Hey 👋 there I’m on the road right after I drop my kids to the hospital

The first time you were able and you had to do something with it I think 💭 it is

Haha yeah that’s the truth of it all haha

Yeast. Sounds right to me.

Just trust me. You don’t understand how it works. Only I understand how it works.

I think terms are being confused and it’s written poorly. From what I gather, the weights are not being updated, and this is not during training. This is someone chatting with the model and it learns new things “on the fly”.

From another article: > For instance, someone could feed the model several example sentences and their sentiments (positive or negative), then prompt it with a new sentence, and the model can give the correct sentiment. Typically, a machine-learning model like GPT-3 would need to be retrained with new data for this new task. During this training process, the model updates its parameters as it processes new information to learn the task. But with in-context learning, the model’s parameters aren’t updated, so it seems like the model learns a new task without learning anything at all.

[deleted]

Yeah i know. I meant a dictionary attack… with the dictionary provided by the user and only the correct websites to be found.

The weights that the AI updates and the "parameters we apply" are quite different. Weights are most definitely updated at run time during training. The fact that it learns without the researcher manually changing parameters is... kind of the whole point of AI.

Everyone knows OTOH is a shorter and more convenient way of writing 'other' /s

You changed it wtf

I’m not understanding how the way that a technology works has to be “discovered”, when the technology was designed by humans to work in a certain way.

Longtime LastPass user. I've switched to using the password function in Microsoft Authenticator, which I was already using for MFA. HUGE PITA - I had over 200 passwords on LastPass. But I'm done with them.

That sounds dangerous. If this thing becomes “smarter” at a rate that outpaces what we’re expecting, look out.

A bunch of uneducated bozos are finally seeing what engineers have seen and been working on for years

There are RSS support extensions for every browser, including FF though? I don't see the issue if you can just re-add the functionality you want with a few clicks.

I'm not sure of the point. It is absolutely using a full browser engine, the same one as Firefox. Which is pretty much how electron apps work, but with chrome as the engine.

There is no need for AMC to censor anything. Hollywood preemptively self-censors their content, because they know full well that if they don't, their movies will be banned in China. Having said that, you can bet that you will never see an AMC board member say, or write anything critical of China, or the CCP.

NBA players, businesses, big tech and politicians all prostrate themselves and kiss the CCP's ass for a chance to stick their snouts into the CCP's trough and none of them will will risk doing anything that would interfere with their corrupt relationship.

> it's not based on Electron.

They say in the blog that it's based on Mozilla Firefox. So instead of a chromium web sandbox (Electron) you get the app based on another browser's web sandbox. I don't really see how that's too different (though I've never used Thunderbird nor Electron-based email clients).

Oh shit you are right. That was the verge. My bad.