Recent comments in /f/technology

Lopsided_Web5432 t1_j8phwa8 wrote

So you’re clueless. Thought so. I never said farmers are stupid, but if you think Joe blow farmer is going to fix his own modern engine you’re dreaming. That’s why John Deere has j men mechanics that go to additional schooling from the company to learn specific engine systems. Your comments are very stupid, stick to skateboarding chum

1

AnacharsisIV t1_j8pguby wrote

> they don't want to be dependent on Europe for anything (see: US spending trillions of dollars on chips manufacturing when they could just buy from Europe instead)

Things like food and microchips are vital to the persistence of the American state. Every country should strive for self-sufficiency in those areas and some other significant industrial capacities. God forbid more wars break out in Europe and we were dependent on them for our chip manufacture; well we just have wait until that war is over (or end it ourselves) if we want chips... or we can see that problem coming and build our own chip factories. The same thing goes with food and that would logically extend to the farming equipment used to create the high yields to feed a country that takes up most of a continent.

It's not unreasonable to want all of this done domestically.

4

teletubby_wrangler t1_j8pfa99 wrote

Haha, arn’t you great at word play, if you boil down what this actual means, it has the same endgoal of anti-trust / monopoly regulation.

But we so lucky to have you to give your critique of the buzzword for the argument.

Btw buzzword is referring to the whole phrase not just a word, it’s so confusing I know!

1

happyscrappy t1_j8pel3s wrote

> Because there WASN'T a fast charging DC infrastructure or standard when they started building their network.

That was then. This is now.

And for the record, I DC fast charged my Nissan LEAF before Tesla even built a single Supercharger. No, not using CCS, but still.

So suggesting Tesla had to decide to go it alone doesn't work. They chose to.

> At this point you'd be asking them to retrofit thousands of stations at their cost because the standard is now set

If they want to ask for financial aid to adapt chargers I'm fine with that. If instead of retrofitting their chargers they simply are prevented from building any new ones that only work with Teslas I'm fine with that.

For a person who is on my side you sure are making up a whole lot of roadblocks to my side. Why?

Yes, I'm saying Tesla should have to decide:

Is CCS infrastructure an asset?

If yes. Then it's time for them to join in it.

If no, then ban Teslas from using CCS infrastructure. Ban them from other (DC) chargers other than their own monopolistic network.

If their idea is "it's useful so we want our cars to use it but we're not going to help anyone else" then they can go hang.

4