Recent comments in /f/technology
Lopsided_Web5432 t1_j8phwa8 wrote
Reply to comment by teletubby_wrangler in 11 states consider 'right to repair' for farming equipment by Ranew
So you’re clueless. Thought so. I never said farmers are stupid, but if you think Joe blow farmer is going to fix his own modern engine you’re dreaming. That’s why John Deere has j men mechanics that go to additional schooling from the company to learn specific engine systems. Your comments are very stupid, stick to skateboarding chum
mabris t1_j8phtat wrote
Reply to comment by djspacepope in They appeared in deepfake porn videos without their consent. Few laws protect them. by LiveStreamReports
And revenge porn is illegal in many jurisdictions…
dumby22 t1_j8phh1a wrote
It really pains me that this is even a thing.
[deleted] t1_j8pheqe wrote
[removed]
phonegears t1_j8phea4 wrote
Reply to Elon Musk, who co-founded firm behind ChatGPT, warns A.I. is ‘one of the biggest risks’ to civilization by ethereal3xp
Writing few lines of crab could risk the life :) They just want to make stories and make their product goes viral before everyone could realized it was just another twitter overhaul
Redararis t1_j8phdn1 wrote
Reply to comment by Retroidhooman in Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by strokeright
yeah, everything is driven by greed, it is a crazy road to progress in the last centuries.
Neutral-President t1_j8phboc wrote
Reply to comment by bubatanka1974 in Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by strokeright
I totally read Bing's side of the conversation in HAL's voice.
DDoubleIntLong t1_j8ph2zk wrote
Reply to comment by beaverbait in Elon Musk, who co-founded firm behind ChatGPT, warns A.I. is ‘one of the biggest risks’ to civilization by ethereal3xp
Haha but that never stops them when it comes to climate change.
Retroidhooman t1_j8pgwnl wrote
Reply to comment by Redararis in Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by strokeright
My point isn't whether or not AI will be impactful, but how it's being handled and marketed at the moment. My point is its being hyped in dishonest ways by marketers and rushed into application even though it isn't ready for that yet.
AnacharsisIV t1_j8pguby wrote
Reply to comment by garlicroastedpotato in 11 states consider 'right to repair' for farming equipment by Ranew
> they don't want to be dependent on Europe for anything (see: US spending trillions of dollars on chips manufacturing when they could just buy from Europe instead)
Things like food and microchips are vital to the persistence of the American state. Every country should strive for self-sufficiency in those areas and some other significant industrial capacities. God forbid more wars break out in Europe and we were dependent on them for our chip manufacture; well we just have wait until that war is over (or end it ourselves) if we want chips... or we can see that problem coming and build our own chip factories. The same thing goes with food and that would logically extend to the farming equipment used to create the high yields to feed a country that takes up most of a continent.
It's not unreasonable to want all of this done domestically.
smilbandit t1_j8pgs8e wrote
there will be a charge for non-tesla use, I guarantee it.
yahoo14life t1_j8pgc7l wrote
Humanity willl kill itself lol 😂
Redararis t1_j8pgajb wrote
Reply to comment by Retroidhooman in Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by strokeright
You could say the same thing about electricity in late 19th century or about cryptocurrency 2 years ago, so I don’t know…!
concealed_cat t1_j8pfvsl wrote
Reply to Lufthansa Passengers Are Stranded Because of a Severe Tech Outage | Airline passengers on 177 flights were impacted when a construction company accidentally cut fiber optic cables, effectively shutting down the airport by Hrmbee
I am surprised that this was possible to happen in Germany, let alone that it actually did...
AnacharsisIV t1_j8pfsae wrote
Reply to comment by Rogueish1 in 11 states consider 'right to repair' for farming equipment by Ranew
There is nothing wrong with lobbying. Writing to your congresscritter to say "tell the cops to stop shooting unarmed black teenagers", congratulations, makes you a lobbyist. There's literally no way to stop lobbying without also trampling on the first amendment.
djsoomo t1_j8pfk4i wrote
The scary thing is we have already passed the point where we can no longer tell if who you are speaking to is human or AI
Movie_Monster t1_j8pfh9y wrote
Reply to comment by Petaris in They appeared in deepfake porn videos without their consent. Few laws protect them. by LiveStreamReports
Right I should have specified the USA.
teletubby_wrangler t1_j8pfa99 wrote
Reply to comment by Lopsided_Web5432 in 11 states consider 'right to repair' for farming equipment by Ranew
Haha, arn’t you great at word play, if you boil down what this actual means, it has the same endgoal of anti-trust / monopoly regulation.
But we so lucky to have you to give your critique of the buzzword for the argument.
Btw buzzword is referring to the whole phrase not just a word, it’s so confusing I know!
skolioban t1_j8pf14m wrote
Reply to comment by desperate_coder in They appeared in deepfake porn videos without their consent. Few laws protect them. by LiveStreamReports
This. Deepfake them doing the things they are preaching against. It doesn't even need to be porn.
happyscrappy t1_j8pel3s wrote
Reply to comment by greatersteven in Tesla Agrees To Open Thousands Of Its Chargers To Other EVs By 2024 by 10MinsForUsername
> Because there WASN'T a fast charging DC infrastructure or standard when they started building their network.
That was then. This is now.
And for the record, I DC fast charged my Nissan LEAF before Tesla even built a single Supercharger. No, not using CCS, but still.
So suggesting Tesla had to decide to go it alone doesn't work. They chose to.
> At this point you'd be asking them to retrofit thousands of stations at their cost because the standard is now set
If they want to ask for financial aid to adapt chargers I'm fine with that. If instead of retrofitting their chargers they simply are prevented from building any new ones that only work with Teslas I'm fine with that.
For a person who is on my side you sure are making up a whole lot of roadblocks to my side. Why?
Yes, I'm saying Tesla should have to decide:
Is CCS infrastructure an asset?
If yes. Then it's time for them to join in it.
If no, then ban Teslas from using CCS infrastructure. Ban them from other (DC) chargers other than their own monopolistic network.
If their idea is "it's useful so we want our cars to use it but we're not going to help anyone else" then they can go hang.
Cranky0ldguy t1_j8pearu wrote
Reply to Elon Musk, who co-founded firm behind ChatGPT, warns A.I. is ‘one of the biggest risks’ to civilization by ethereal3xp
Honestly, does anyone take him seriously anymore? It seems like he's made one really bad decision after another. He's certainly not the "big thinker" he (apparently) thinks himself to be.
happyscrappy t1_j8pdwzb wrote
Reply to comment by greatersteven in Tesla Agrees To Open Thousands Of Its Chargers To Other EVs By 2024 by 10MinsForUsername
I never said anything about forcing Tesla to use CCS for their own cars.
DBDude t1_j8pdbxh wrote
Reply to comment by marcololol in Elon Musk, who co-founded firm behind ChatGPT, warns A.I. is ‘one of the biggest risks’ to civilization by ethereal3xp
Yes he did, one of six principle founders. He was also the founder of SpaceX. He didn’t found Tesla, but it was just three guys with an idea when he joined.
[deleted] t1_j8pd949 wrote
Reply to comment by xBelowAveragex in They appeared in deepfake porn videos without their consent. Few laws protect them. by LiveStreamReports
[removed]
dima1109 t1_j8phxeu wrote
Reply to Tesla Agrees To Open Thousands Of Its Chargers To Other EVs By 2024 by 10MinsForUsername
on dec 31, 2024 they will open one ccs plug at harris ranch