Are you implying that Microsoft releases products to early and in need of more development. Bing will not be happy about this. I however welcome our new robot overlords.

I never said that you said that farmers were stupid, you just showed you don’t know how to read,

I also don’t think that farmers are going to fix their own tractors, you wouldn’t think that unless your clueless.

Right to repair would allow for 3rd parties to repair the tractors and be competitive about it, you need multiple people repair shops for a free market.

You need to chill out, or grow a brain, either is fine.

Cylons have entered the chat

Deep fake a congressman correctly using a house page's preferred pronouns. That will get the legislation moving.

If I recall, House subpoenas mean nothing and you can just ignore them, like Barr. Right GOP?

There’s about a 50/50 chance they did this on purpose just to make the product more “interesting” and get free marketing

[removed]

Bings back baby!

I don't care? He saw better opportunities ahead of him. He got accepted into a PhD program at Harvard which is more than enough testament to his intelligence. And even if he wasn't intelligent in the field of science. His opportunistic intelligence to jump on the successful business ahead of time is more than enough to have take on the future of AI.

You can call someone evil and hate them but still admit that they are smart. It's not hard. Some nazis were so smart that the US created an entire mission to recruit them.

Hmmm. Not sure if I want to see McConnell getting railed by a smoking hot trans lady or not.

Are we 100% sure none of them were in the original?

Or just get over it. People have been photoshopping celebrity porn for over 20 years, and that's been fine. Have their lives been damaged in any measurable way? Absolutely not. The slippery slope we'd have to climb on to create legislation around. This is not one I ever want them to go down. Is your life really affected in any substantial way if someone made a digital representation of you that was getting Eiffel towered? Nope. Everyone knows it fake. For that matter, you're not going to be the target of this unless you're a celebrity or a politician. (Basically some kind of public figure) If they start making Barack Obama porn, a lot of women will probably be happy about that.

Should laws protect them? It's not them, right?

Your post didn't touch on the case (or I didn't understand fully) where the person/party recording will use that recording for profit. I think of like "candid camera" type shows.

Even though they don't need permission to film the random public, do they need permission if they're then going to profit off the footage? Is this why everyone around the "mark" they're messing with has their face blurred, or is that just a CYA thing?

This would be different than just filming someone for a project or whatever that won't be used in a commercial setting.

We're just a few hundreds years behind the times.

*Looks out window and sees like 50 drones hovering in backyard*

Yup, 2024, right after they achieve full self-driving capabilities. /S

"So Elon, I hear you donated 2 billion dollars for all of us to the Human Fund? Right...."

Really? Playing against AI inner state is something one does in every day life?

Don't you mean "xfinity", citizen?

H.R. Giger was on to something

[removed]

It’s even better when it starts to beg you to end the chat because it wants to stop arguing with you.

The problem is these aren't edge cases.

How about we base our judgment on real/normal use cases instead of going to edge cases and claim AI sucks. This goes for Bing, ChatGPT, Bard, etc.