Recent comments in /f/technology
dandrevee t1_j8ttrsf wrote
Thr podcast "Capitalisnt" had an episode interview (came out today, i think) of an author who wrtor a book on democracy and capitalism that is likely relevant here.
Though, given Musks a) questionable actions in the last as a company owner and b)appearance with Murdoch at the super bowl and also c) behavior in regards to Twitter, it is unlikely he cares about egalitarian govt or a fair, regulated market
Imnot_your_buddy_guy t1_j8ttqt2 wrote
Reply to They appeared in deepfake porn videos without their consent. Few laws protect them. by LiveStreamReports
I’d start wearing a mask if I was a female twitch star…
MrJoePike t1_j8tt97h wrote
Still a twat
danielravennest t1_j8tt6vd wrote
Reply to comment by sweetplantveal in YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki to Step Down by 08830
She's worth about 3/4 of a billion. She can do whatever she wants at this point. I assume Google paid rent in shares or she got into one of the early funding rounds.
boringexplanation t1_j8tshjm wrote
Reply to comment by PrecedentialAssassin in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
The heat wave hit 110s to 120 on certain days. Doubt Texas ever had to handle that high for an extended time.
Eye_foran_Eye t1_j8ts9uw wrote
Reply to Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
They’re tired if being without electricity. Careful though, Paxton & Abbot will figure out a way to charge you more or outlaw solar panels like AZ did.
[deleted] t1_j8ts7k8 wrote
Reply to comment by MacDegger in Microsoft officially blesses Parallels as a way to run Windows on M1, M2 Macs by ActivePersona
[deleted]
Verrico t1_j8ts5v0 wrote
Reply to comment by texasauras in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
I copy and pasted all your comments in this thread into chatGPT and asked it to critique you. Lmao
“Overall, these comments are dismissive and sarcastic, and lack constructive engagement with the topic at hand. The commenter seems to be defensive and may not have fully understood the point being made.
Firstly, the initial comment "Not true, in these parts we don't wait for government to do everything for us" seems to be a strawman argument, as the original point being made was not about waiting for the government to do everything, but rather the need for a comprehensive energy infrastructure that provides reliable and sustainable energy for everyone.
The commenter then goes on to brag about their personal use of solar power, while also accusing others of not doing enough. This tone comes off as condescending and unhelpful.
Moreover, the claim that using solar energy frees up power and resources for those who can't is not necessarily true, as the energy infrastructure is not that simple. The commenter is also dismissive of the original point that lack of energy security is a serious issue, and may not be aware of the challenges that come with relying solely on solar power.
The commenter's response to the rebuttal seems to be defensive and unproductive, with more sarcastic remarks and personal attacks. They accuse the other person of lacking education, without actually engaging with the substance of the rebuttal.
Lastly, the commenter's claim that local utilities are disincentivizing the use of solar by reducing purchase rates and adding extra fees may have some truth, but it is a very simplistic view of the situation. There are many factors at play, including the need to maintain and upgrade the energy infrastructure, and provide reliable energy for everyone, not just those who can afford solar panels.
In conclusion, the comments lack substance and a constructive engagement with the topic at hand, and instead, are dismissive, sarcastic, and defensive.”
nalninek t1_j8trl4x wrote
Reply to comment by anti-torque in ChatGPT is a robot con artist, and we’re suckers for trusting it by altmorty
So it’s just a better version of the chat bots that’ve been around for a decade?
Rude-Opinion-3711 t1_j8tr7b9 wrote
Pretty sure Elon/Tesla haven't even been fulfilling their obligations to the State of NY for the Tesla facility in question. They're supposed to hire X number of workers by Y year for this facility and they're nowhere near meeting the numbers.
MountainMoments t1_j8tqky3 wrote
Reply to comment by bit1101 in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
This was one of the funniest comment threads I've read in a while. Thanks for that haha. And seriously the rod up texasauras's butt must have a rod up its butt. Text book whiner who cannot follow the plot of a conversation when it's literally narrated to him.
somegridplayer t1_j8tq9qx wrote
On script for Elno.
MpVpRb t1_j8tq1yh wrote
Anyone who trusts it deserves what they get
It's an amusing toy that may have some practical use in some areas after a lot of work
At its core, it's just math
CaterpillarAny8669 t1_j8toz1o wrote
Meanwhile humans are still arguing about god and which one is the real one 😀
Badtrainwreck t1_j8towtc wrote
Reply to comment by voyageur77 in Elon Musk donates almost $2bn of Tesla shares to charity by Nergaal
It’s not rich people bad, it’s not about buying a yacht for wealthy person to use, you’re using my thrown out example to explain to you the basics of something as literal.
People and organizations with a lot of stocks, use that stocks to buy an asset, they then take loans against that asset. Nothing stops a nonprofit from buying property, nothing says they can only own specific assets.
investing in property is a normal way to protect wealth. It’s not rich people bad, it’s this is what’s normal. You might not like it but the difference between a nonprofit and a profit driven organization is that a for profit institutions goals is to increase profit for its shareholders. A nonprofit can do the exact same but instead be used to drive wages for the workers.
I’ve remodeled a nursing home which no longer existed but their paperwork was still there, that’s how I learned the not for profit was being used to fund the director because the director purchased the property the nursing home operated on, the nursing home took care of all maintenance and costs, and the director just took a large amount in rent. Very legal, very normal, very much a for profit hidden as a nonprofit
ACCount82 t1_j8too04 wrote
Reply to comment by PrecedentialAssassin in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
California shitting on Texas power grid is like that pointing Spider-Man meme.
1leggeddog t1_j8tned6 wrote
Elon can afford breaking the law by firing these workers as it will cost him less in the long run then letting them unionize
"When the penalty for a crime is a fee, the law is for poor people"
[deleted] t1_j8tn6rk wrote
Reply to comment by 9-11GaveMe5G in Tesla Workers Fired in Alleged Retaliation Following Union Push by LeBoulu777
[deleted]
ethereal3xp OP t1_j8tn6g5 wrote
Reply to comment by Jake0024 in Elon Musk, who co-founded firm behind ChatGPT, warns A.I. is ‘one of the biggest risks’ to civilization by ethereal3xp
Because he doesnt trust anybody else other than himself
General AI in theory would mean a easier/comfortable life for humans
But humans may end up becoming dumber. And in addition if the AI inventor was some kind of environmentalist.... he could set the AI to action based on "saving the planet"
Meaning shut off power, gas, factories (when not needed) etc.... even if it could mean some human suffering.
And a human couldnt override
MacDegger t1_j8tmb6l wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Microsoft officially blesses Parallels as a way to run Windows on M1, M2 Macs by ActivePersona
Hailcorporate comment, right there.
How much do you get paid?
bryanczarniack t1_j8tm3pk wrote
Reply to comment by texasauras in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
This is a dumb take
Jake0024 t1_j8tlta8 wrote
Reply to comment by ethereal3xp in Elon Musk, who co-founded firm behind ChatGPT, warns A.I. is ‘one of the biggest risks’ to civilization by ethereal3xp
Correct, a self driving car is not general AI. And yes, it's a long way off. That's why Musk freaking out about ChatGPT is so hilarious.
corp_code_slinger t1_j8tlss8 wrote
Reply to comment by anti-torque in ChatGPT is a robot con artist, and we’re suckers for trusting it by altmorty
That's the mark of a good con-man. They'll tell you exactly what you want to hear and sincerely believe their own BS.
ACCount82 t1_j8tlgw2 wrote
Reply to comment by ivanatorhk in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
That's the beauty of solar though - you don't have to wait for the government to do something. You can do "something" on your own.
Can't run nuclear in your backyard - but rooftop solar is getting more and more viable in more and more areas, even without government subsidies or power buyback programs.
dlgn13 t1_j8tttpj wrote
Reply to comment by Ok_Kale_2509 in Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by strokeright
What is the difference between its function and a human brain, fundamentally? We just absorb stimuli and react according to rules mediated by our internal structure.