Recent comments in /f/technology
vanhalenbr t1_j8vqek7 wrote
How Tesla and Elon can get away with it? It’s illegal.
bigbangbilly t1_j8vqc9u wrote
Zakhar looks a bit like David Harbor
Deepspacesquid t1_j8vq0ro wrote
Reply to comment by anti-torque in ChatGPT is a robot con artist, and we’re suckers for trusting it by altmorty
Business inside is a con artist and we are falling for it.
StruggleBus619 t1_j8vpds0 wrote
Reply to comment by FlyingCockAndBalls in Microsoft officially blesses Parallels as a way to run Windows on M1, M2 Macs by ActivePersona
Correct, as far as I know that is still in place for some unknown amount of time. Alongside that initial report about the deal from 2021, was info that Microsoft was working with Qualcomm and MediaTek on chips for ARM based Windows PCs. When ever Microsoft decides it's ready to launch and move forward with those is when i think the deal will magically end and Windows for ARM will be open for manufacturers to run wild with.
jharrom t1_j8vot12 wrote
Reply to comment by FlingingGoronGonads in Nasa wants to build an oxygen pipeline on the moon by FlingingGoronGonads
Low gravity and an almost complete vacuum are both huge challenges. Traditional construction of almost all structures on earth are engineered by necessity to compensate, use, and account for much stronger gravity. Add high-pressure liquefied gasses, huge temperature swings unlike anything on Earth, and the additional radiation. You not only have to build and run such a structure under those conditions, you have to use a ridiculous amount of safety precautions and redundant systems to guarantee the system won't fail catastrophically.
gurenkagurenda t1_j8voslg wrote
Reply to comment by TheBigFeIIa in ChatGPT is a robot con artist, and we’re suckers for trusting it by altmorty
Log probabilities are the actual output of the model (although what those probabilities directly mean once you're using reinforcement learning seems sort of nebulous), and I wonder if uncertainty about actual facts is reflected in lower probabilities in the top scoring tokens. If so, you could imagine encoding the scores in the actual output (ultimately hidden from the user), so that the model can keep track of its past uncertainty. You could imagine that with training, it might be able to interpret what those low scoring tokens imply, from "I'm not sure I'm using this word correctly" to "this one piece might be mistaken" to "this one piece might be wrong, and if so, everything after it is wrong".
StruggleBus619 t1_j8vosbc wrote
Reply to comment by PerpetuallyOffline in Microsoft officially blesses Parallels as a way to run Windows on M1, M2 Macs by ActivePersona
You might be thinking of Rosetta 2, the emulation app Apple uses to emulate/translate x86 Mac software. Apple Silicon Macs do not currently have Boot Camp on them.
gurenkagurenda t1_j8vnlyo wrote
Reply to comment by anti-torque in ChatGPT is a robot con artist, and we’re suckers for trusting it by altmorty
I think you must be getting confused because of the "reward predictor". The reward predictor is a separate model which is used in training to reduce the amount of human effort needed to train the main model. Think of it as an amplifier for human feedback. Prediction is not what the model being trained does.
gurenkagurenda t1_j8vnao5 wrote
Reply to comment by anti-torque in ChatGPT is a robot con artist, and we’re suckers for trusting it by altmorty
>so... predictive
No, not in any but the absolute broadest sense of that word, which would apply to any model which outputs text. In particular, it is not "search out the most common next word", because "most common" is not the criterion it is being trained on. Satisfying the reward model is not a matter of matching a corpus. Read the article I linked.
[deleted] t1_j8vn9hw wrote
[deleted]
opknorrsk t1_j8vn3jo wrote
Reply to Google CEO Sundar Pichai asks employees to put two to four hours into helping to improve and 'dogfood' its Bard chatbot by tester989chromeos
This feels a bit like a panic mode rather than a solid plan. Trying to catch-up with competition rather than innovate won't secure their leadership position on the web.
bingojed t1_j8vmwlc wrote
Reply to comment by usdrpvvimwfvrzjavnrs in Tesla Workers Announced a Union Drive. The Next Day They Were Fired. by psychothumbs
It was only one of them according to the response.
[deleted] t1_j8vmpvz wrote
[removed]
ooglebaggle t1_j8vmpeu wrote
It’s definitely politically left leaning to say the least
Jim-JM t1_j8vmac2 wrote
ChatGPT like all AI is not the problem. The real problem is those with biological intelligence and how they use it.
radio_yyz t1_j8vm6xt wrote
Reply to comment by Arclite83 in ChatGPT is a robot con artist, and we’re suckers for trusting it by altmorty
Have you or work in a logic or computation field?
This is something 99% of people don’t understand and “I” part of “A.I” is grossly exaggerated nowadays.
[deleted] t1_j8vm4om wrote
Reply to comment by staggeringox in Tesla Workers Announced a Union Drive. The Next Day They Were Fired. by psychothumbs
[removed]
jimlemin t1_j8vlz70 wrote
Reply to comment by Gold_Rush69 in YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki to Step Down by 08830
Do you think they’re gonna replace her with someone at all different?
SylvesterStapwn t1_j8vlrwz wrote
Reply to comment by TheBigFeIIa in ChatGPT is a robot con artist, and we’re suckers for trusting it by altmorty
I had a complex data set for which I wasn’t sure what the best chart for demonstrating it would be. I gave chatgpt the broadstrokes of the type of data I had, and the story I was trying to tell, and it gave me the perfect chart, a breakdown of what data goes where, and an explanation of why it was the superior choice. Couldn’t have asked for a better assist.
Miserable-Put4914 t1_j8vloi9 wrote
Billionaire’s continue to take advantage of their workers. It’s disgusting.
SalaciousCoffee t1_j8vlo96 wrote
Reply to comment by saanity in Tesla Workers Announced a Union Drive. The Next Day They Were Fired. by psychothumbs
The government serves those that pay for it's service.
That's it.
You join government through an election, the election is one of the costs to do business with government.
Folks pool their money and get fractional interest in pokiticians, but they spread it across all of them so they will lean one way or another.
No money? No power.
[deleted] t1_j8vlg0l wrote
Reply to comment by slackinfux in Google CEO Sundar Pichai asks employees to put two to four hours into helping to improve and 'dogfood' its Bard chatbot by tester989chromeos
[deleted]
KingGidorah t1_j8vl1rh wrote
Illegal… shut them down
wh4tth3huh t1_j8vl1jd wrote
Reply to comment by Eye_foran_Eye in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
The stupidest place to ban solar. Most of the state is a fucking desert, there's nothing there, why not just plaster it with shit tons of solar panels and sell that power out of state.
bigbangbilly t1_j8vqhvd wrote
Reply to comment by nemom in US launches artificial intelligence military use initiative by stepsinstereo
We already have infiltration units. They're called social media bots. Instead of a fast plasma bolt death. It's a slow one via collective ignorance