Recent comments in /f/technology

uparm t1_j910ep4 wrote

there's already better search engines, I just wish they were better known. I use duckduckgo and I find the search results far better, primarily due to the lack of censored results. Also the complete lack of promoted results. If I search for something, I want what I searched for, end of story. Google hasn't done that for a long time.

1

stu54 t1_j90zc6u wrote

A 1060 SHOULD play almost every game out there. The games that don't are mostly open world RPGs like we had in 2014 with low graphics settings options omitted.

The power consumption is what offends me most. Like, by now you should be able to play games on 200 watts, but nope, 500+ watts or GTFO.

6

steampunk-me t1_j90vj00 wrote

Exactly.

We in Reddit live in a tech bubble, but the majority of people I've worked with in non-tech companies couldn't find an answer in Google to save their lives.

They would talk to me, I would translate their questions into keywords that would bring the best results, then I'd show them the results.

The average person is that tech illiterate.

The first company that gets search engine plus conversational AI right is going to revolutionize the market.

There's a reason Google got so desperate with Bing AI's announcement. They know this. They also know this fundamentally destroys more than half their income (search ads), so they have to be the one that gets it first and mold it into something that favors them.

But new AI search startups? They have no stake in keeping search engines that lucrative. They can focus on the best product (for the user). If they destroy Google's business model and walk away with just 5% of the revenue, they still become one of the largest players around.

2

tanrgith t1_j90tjuw wrote

Progressive ex twitter employee posts article on progressive newsite the atlantic, expressing feelings of not being a fan of Elon Musk's changes to Twitter, more news at 11

As if Twitter wasn't already a toxic hellscape long before Musk took it over

−18

myne t1_j90tg16 wrote

I'm fairly sure they look at the steam stats when they make a game and make sure it'll run ok on at least the top 70% of the in-use market.

Sure, you have to turn stuff off/down, but it still should play ok.

It's a volume business. They need sales. They need to target the audience that exists.

I'll note the 1060 is finally the #2 card on steam.

A 6 year old mid range card is still way up there in the market. It'll be hard for game designers to not target it.

45