Recent comments in /f/technology

ForkLiftBoi t1_j91g06x wrote

Well ideally you'd do it as an agency. But we've seen how that can also have major changes quickly with administration changes... Used to be more stable as was the intent of agencies, but they're largely not.

So I would say I wish they were regulated by an agency created by Congress with characteristics they used to be 70-80 years ago. But yeah that ain't gonna happen

10

doneandtired2014 t1_j91frgl wrote

The gist of the article is that NVIDIA and AMD are focusing on the halo tier at the exclusion of all else and pricing their cards in an effort to maintain cryptoboom margins in the face of crypto collapsing like a neutron star (for the third time).

If you needed a sub-$900 card today, your options are 1) pay $100-$200 over MSRP for RTX 30 stock, 2) try to snag RDNA2 products before the remaining stock pool evaporates, 3) hope most of your games use DX12 or Vulkan on ARC.

Adding to that, performance gains have basically flatlined at the sub $400 price point. $380 in 2016 got you a GTX 1070. $300 in 2023 gets you...OCed GTX 1070 performance from AMD and NVIDIA. Intel shines here when a game gets along well with their drivers. When a game doesn't, you get performance on par with a GTX 1050 Ti.

$200 gets you cards that aren't even as perfomant as the $200 options from 7 years ago.

6

BarbequeCheese t1_j91exjd wrote

Will smaller companies have the budget to train the models, and pay the ML researchers to build and develop them?
Estimates say it cost millions to train those models (https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/hwfjej/d_the_cost_of_training_gpt3/) and OpenAI in particular have been pretty clear that they see scaling models up as the best path to better performance (like this https://lastweekin.ai/p/the-ai-scaling-hypothesis).
And in reality, you don't just train one model, there will have been many, many iterations to get where they are.
Will a startup have the financial grunt and / or the in house computational resource to catchup to the big players? They'd need a lot of resources from somewhere.

3

mysticalfruit t1_j91dvw5 wrote

When I heard that Musk wanted 50 pages of code printed out, I knew the end was coming. That is the most useless metric you could possibly measure by.

The haphazard firings, then the "Please come back" we fucked up. The dismantling of anything resembling moderation on the platform.

The fact people are coming forward and telling tales of an environment being run by an unhinged lunatic with delusions of grandeur doesn't surprise me one bit. This is his shtick.

Though imagine your a DC engineer who got let go from this shitshow, getting a job right now..

"Yeah, nobody is left, but we built such a resilient infrastructure he can unplug entire racks and it'll keep working.. for a while.."

65

bigkoi t1_j91d9wq wrote

Look at past news from Google. My bet is that Google has been sitting on their AI for years, tuning it getting it consumer ready. My bet is that they can release something better than Bing very quickly if needed.

For example, the news from last year about the Google AI tester that claimed Lambda was sentient.

Google knew exactly that Bing's chatbot would fail like this when exposed to consumers.

The difference between Google and Microsoft is expectations. If Google released a chatbot like Bing it would have been brand damaging. For Microsoft it's just another bad consumer experience over the years.

1

whatweshouldcallyou t1_j91bj4h wrote

"Algorithmic bias" research is mostly trash. The more rigorous of it just pretends statisticians haven't been working on sample adjustment and balancing for causal inference for literally generations, and the less rigorous simply insists that we should ignore that things are not equally and identically distributed across population subgroups.

−10

Nevermorre t1_j91b7ut wrote

That's why I upgraded to my current GPU. However, to be fair, I do think my RX 580 was starting to show its age and I knew it was not going to favor a lot that would be coming out fairly soon. I could still play on mid settings mostly fine, but this game specifically, had some graphic bugs - mostly with WILD water textures getting streched all over the place making vision impossible. Also, the area around where I customize my wand, I'm guessing it was the "hitbox" even though it was not an active item. Anyway, after poking around online, I found others with the same issues and we all had the same card, I think I saw a 570 but close enough.

I'm not nearly as much of a gamer as I use to be, hell I dropped gaming for almost two years and only really got back in when Spiderman and Days Gone dropped on Steam. Not long after I finished Days Gone, Hogwarts Legacy was just a couple months on the horizon. Not sure what I'll pick up next, but I like to keep my system ready all the same. Also, I planned for upgrading my main components when I built my PC, one piece at a time every few years. I'm not entirely sure where my Ryzen 5 3600 sits currently, from what I understand it's still a humble, but competitive, piece I hope to get a few more years out of.

1

laserwaffles t1_j91b3os wrote

Elon regularly bans people for disagreeing with him. He is worse than Twitter used to be about banning, because Twitter used to ban for violations. Now they'll ban you if Musk just doesn't like you.

Musk has gone pretty far right, and definitely isn't in any way for free speech for anyone but him.

6