Recent comments in /f/technology
burnt-out-b t1_j92ncdc wrote
Reply to comment by burnt-out-b in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
Okay. It is megawatt hours... Apparently, the theoretical maximum efficiency is around 0.2MWh per ton.
burnt-out-b t1_j92mua1 wrote
They say "0.77 mWh per ton"... Is this a typo? I'm reading this as milliwatt hours per ton, which seems too good to be true. Though megawatt hours per ton seems too high to be viable...
pain_in_the_dupa t1_j92kr7i wrote
Reply to comment by cambeiu in Ultra-enthusiast hardware is strangling PC gaming by redhatGizmo
Oh hell. I hope you’re wrong, because I don’t want to be playing the game equivalent of a K-car with an 85mph mandatory max speedometer.
DustyJanglesisdead t1_j92j2yz wrote
Reply to comment by tanrgith in I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
This is the truth of it right here.
DST2287 t1_j92iyn8 wrote
Reply to comment by Inconceivable-2020 in Ultra-enthusiast hardware is strangling PC gaming by redhatGizmo
Hell, most games don’t play correctly, so many shitty pc ports lately.
just-bair t1_j92ip68 wrote
The bing ai looks fun and all but I wouldn’t use it for any serious searches. Some people will tough
whyrageman t1_j92iijl wrote
Reply to comment by redbrick5 in I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
sorry to say but reddit is much,much more censored then twitter is after the takeover by Musk i do not like the guy be he is actually delivering on freedom of speech,unlike here where wer going backwards.
Dark_Destroyer t1_j92hcnf wrote
It's not ultra-enthusiasts that are strangling PC gaming. It is that NVIDIA and AMD expected miners to continue to buy high end cards to mine crypto.
Now that mining is a thing of the past, both companies are sitting on a pile of chips while at the same time, used GPUs from miners are flooding the market.
They should have seen the writing on the wall when the warning was given that mining crypto will no longer be a thing a year prior to it ending.
What will most likely happen in the next year or two, is cards will come down in price but most likely not to where they were before the pandemic.
Norci t1_j92h0yy wrote
Reply to comment by MrVandalous in Apple Pushing to Launch Search Engine to Rival Google by DragonWarrior566
I don't think those statements really hold true for iPhone. A full touch and app based phone was a pretty novel concept, considering how the rest of the phones looked and operated back there, and there were plenty of successful actors in the mobile phone market.
Sure, it's not a 100% world breaking invention, it's still a phone, but it's still a novel concept.
[deleted] t1_j92fzps wrote
Ihaveasmallwang t1_j92fjk3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
Was banned for violating the rules they agreed to. Not because of politics. Try again.
Wadae28 t1_j92fate wrote
I’d say the lack of games is strangling all of gaming. I own a PC and a PS4. I can’t think of any titles that are generation defining technology wise. Don’t get me wrong, games like GOW Ragnarok are amazing but I was more impressed with the story telling and performances than the visuals.
[deleted] t1_j92f1f3 wrote
hurfery t1_j92e4q8 wrote
Reply to comment by NuTeacher in Ultra-enthusiast hardware is strangling PC gaming by redhatGizmo
4k 120 fps is where it's at. 😎
Well yes but tech progress isn't really progress if you pay 3x more for 3x performance. New tech is supposed to give more performance per dollar compared to the old one.
thenrepent t1_j92e36w wrote
Reply to comment by mvw2 in Ultra-enthusiast hardware is strangling PC gaming by redhatGizmo
> For raw cost, crypto miners and scalpers have played a big part of scarcity, unfortunately. And they are driving real costs well above MSRP. This in turn makes older cards more valuable and pushes up the entire market space as a whole. Everything is expensive just for the sake of being expensive. A few people simply exist to make a pile of money from it. And for these dumb reasons a 10 year old card can be sold for as much as it was bought new a decade ago.
The demand for GPUs for crypto mining should be fairly low nowadays - it was primarily Ethereum being mined with GPUs, and Ethereum switched to proof of stake (no mining). So that demand has fallen away entirely.
[deleted] t1_j92dx9x wrote
Reply to comment by ThePrince14 in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
[deleted]
mvw2 t1_j92dp8e wrote
It's the same model for cars and houses. It's a model that works great when the market volume is limited. You have limited sales, and you maximize profits to that limited number by focusing almost exclusively at the high end. It's a model that's good for business but forces customers to buy nothing, buy old, or buy into only the high end at exorbitant prices. ALL the in-between stuff is gone.
For video card makers, they have a unique hurdle. They are pushing hard into edge case tech, pushing as far as they can achieve with the physics of materials. And outside of ideological change of structure optimizations and good software optimization, this is really just a game of attempting to produce at the edge of science and do so without massive scrap losses. Worse yet, all the costs are tied into the process of it all, so cards from low end to high end barely cost different. It doesn't cost them hardly anything less to produce a bottom tier video card, but they'll make a lot less from it. Plus they have to be competitive with other brands and older generations of themselves. The push for performance and push for higher cost go hand-in-hand making sure the new stuff remains just barely the better value.
For raw cost, crypto miners and scalpers have played a big part of scarcity, unfortunately. And they are driving real costs well above MSRP. This in turn makes older cards more valuable and pushes up the entire market space as a whole. Everything is expensive just for the sake of being expensive. A few people simply exist to make a pile of money from it. And for these dumb reasons a 10 year old card can be sold for as much as it was bought new a decade ago.
Now our saving grace as PC gamers is that games have long become very flexible in hardware needs. The transition to Steam and the high analytics it brought to manufacturers showed quite starkly how ancient people's hardware had become. Game developers are forced to temper their designs to work on much, much older hardware. This has provided a customer base with a LOT of breathing room for holding onto very old tech or only performing very minor upgrades to retain the ability to play brand new games.
This used to not be the case at all. In the early days games forced hardware development, to the point where every new game was nearly unplayable on anything but the absolute newest hardware. You HAD to upgrade your entire computer every 2 to 4 years just to play anything new. You couldn't simply set graphics to low and magically make an older PC play it. The tech and software advanced way too fast. You could literally spend $3k on a brand new PC, and there was a chance that it could not play the game that was coming out 6 months later. The technology race was that aggressive.
This ground to a halt in the late 90s and early 2000s when this model was no longer viable. It shifted the burden of flexibility on game developers and forced them to slow down and accommodate. Today, you can play current year titles with a 15 year old PC. Not long ago that was unfathomable.
However, what this has also created was this weird vacuum in the hardware world. There actually isn't much driving next generations. You do have commercial users and professionals wanting faster task speeds for simulations, rendering, etc. But outside of that, PC gamers haven't really had drivers outside of high res monitors. There isn't much actually pushing graphics cards these days. Many developers are also bound by the heavy console market that are all stuck in one time period in history, and all these new titles have to work on them too. But for PC folks, the push is pretty much solely monitor resolution, stepping from 1080 to 4k and now into 8k. The need for that isn't even worthwhile. It's just there. And it's about the only thing pushing video cards forward. Sure, there's ray tracing too, but that's a singular use case. You still have developers catering to decade or older tech, so the game itself can never really ever again push the boundaries like it used to. And thinks like 4k, 8k, multi-monitor, etc. are just throughput equations. So the game in today's graphics card world is just that, throughput of pixel volume.
DevAnalyzeOperate t1_j92bzxs wrote
Reply to comment by Hrmbee in I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
Her job was nonsense, her job was algorithm biaser, she biased algorithms so they wouldn’t hit non-majorities, musk came in and stripped the “toxic speech identification” and removed bias against all groups entirely. I don’t care if you claim to be benefiting white hetero Christian’s or trans black folx, by putting your finger on the scale of algorithms, you’re picking favourites.
She was paid to perpetuate something fundamentally unethical, good riddance, how lame do you have to be for Elon Musk of all people to be more ethical than you?
Those who want to regulate social media into mandatory discrimination are fucking evil by the way and if anything is this about as good as an argument for self-regulation as you are going to get.
ZippyTheWonderSnail t1_j92b6yo wrote
Reply to comment by TbonerT in Majority of Texans back shift to solar energy by Sorin61
There are zero people who are dumb enough to think 1200 internet users, who can anonymously self report both demographics and location, represent the population of 27 million people.
No amount of "the math is sound" will translate into "the conclusion is meaningful".
Ihaveasmallwang t1_j92ay31 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
So what you’re saying is that you don’t even have a single specific example to back up your claim? I’m not surprised.
Tiny-Peenor t1_j92anm9 wrote
Reply to comment by jambrown13977931 in Tesla fired New York workers 'in retaliation for union activity,' complaint alleges by influ
Yeah they often tell employees they’re going to be laid off a day before they actually do it. I have some seaside property to sell you in Kansas
[deleted] t1_j929ep6 wrote
[deleted] t1_j9296tc wrote
MpVpRb t1_j927xme wrote
Reply to I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
The line between genius and madness is thin and fuzzy. Musk made a stupid and terrible mistake. I hope this is just a one time screwup, and not the start of a descent into madness
bareboneschicken t1_j92ptw4 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
I'm proud of being banned from multiple parts of Reddit.