Recent comments in /f/technology
E_Snap t1_j95bawr wrote
Reply to comment by chris_p_bacon1 in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
Make limestone
Ok_Marionberry_9932 t1_j95auwc wrote
What a stupid article. Just play with what you have, there tons of games out there that don’t require the latest hardware
AutoModerator t1_j95aovd wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in UN says AI poses 'serious risk' for human rights by Circlemadeeverything
Thank you for your submission, but due to the high volume of spam coming from Medium.com and similar self-publishing sites, /r/Technology has opted to filter all of those posts pending mod approval. You may [message the moderators](/message/compose?to=/r/technology&subject=Request for post review) to request a review/approval provided you are not the author or are not associated at all with the submission. Thank you for understanding.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[deleted] t1_j95aoun wrote
Reply to comment by ActuatorMaterial2846 in UN says AI poses 'serious risk' for human rights by Circlemadeeverything
[removed]
GMW-5610 t1_j959awa wrote
Turns out moving out of China is a bit more difficult than Reddit makes it out to be.
__s10e t1_j9594v7 wrote
So, as expected?
taisui t1_j958hho wrote
Reply to comment by djkuhl in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
and they are delicious!
ukezi t1_j9580ud wrote
Reply to comment by burnt-out-b in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
It's MWh. However in comparison, direct air capture is at about 1.2MWh/t.
jhansen858 t1_j957wmy wrote
Reply to comment by icbmike_for_realz in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
there is a lot of unused land with no trees on it. especially in the midwest.
tiktaktok_65 t1_j956lfp wrote
Reply to comment by DevAnalyzeOperate in I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
again someone making a general statement without knowing shit. the world is more complicated than your gut sense or your anecdotal experience.
tiktaktok_65 t1_j956ihw wrote
Reply to comment by whatweshouldcallyou in I Watched Elon Musk Kill Twitter’s Culture From the Inside | This bizarre episode in social-media history proves that it’s well past time for meaningful tech oversight by Hrmbee
you don't even know what she did. talking out of your fucking ass.
Neutral-President t1_j95679h wrote
This is not surprising, given the very different work cultures between the two countries.
Gumbercleus t1_j955quo wrote
Reply to Diablo IV’s open beta starts next month by Sorin61
But do we actually want to give money to activision-blizzard?
9-11GaveMe5G t1_j955ohw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Diablo IV’s open beta starts next month by Sorin61
I rather enjoyed D3, but immortal was a mobile so inevitably it was a p2w nightmare
FlyingCockAndBalls t1_j955jw3 wrote
depends if we ever make AGI
Cyan-ranger t1_j955eal wrote
Reply to Diablo IV’s open beta starts next month by Sorin61
I’ll admit diablo 3 wasn’t the best at the start but it turned into a really great game with updates and the reaper DLC. Hopefully this is more of what D3 is now and less of what it was at the start.
Sengara t1_j9546c6 wrote
Reply to Diablo IV’s open beta starts next month by Sorin61
I have been playing Diablo for years. I loved 1 and 2, and 3 was fun after they killed the real money AH.
I expect D4 to be utterly unplayable because of microtransactions, banners, and battle passes.
I really hate that I won't be able to play Diablo 4 because I know right off the bat I won't want to pay an extra ~$30 after buying the game for the cool wings I will forever regret missing.
iligal_odin t1_j95342k wrote
Reply to Diablo IV’s open beta starts next month by Sorin61
High chance there will be no indication of micro transactions during the beta, just to be bombarded with it on launch
ActivisionBIizzard t1_j95312f wrote
Reply to Diablo IV’s open beta starts next month by Sorin61
Never too early to save for the P2W!
TheRetenor t1_j952r34 wrote
Reply to comment by cuddly_carcass in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
Life also needs carbon in the air. It's just that there's a bit too much of it in it, for both cases.
Gumbercleus t1_j952qwu wrote
Reply to comment by Agreeable-Meat1 in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
The ocean does absorb carbon, and in doing so becomes more acidic. This is (part of) the process currently killing/bleaching coral reefs.
Agreeable-Meat1 t1_j9527ar wrote
Reply to comment by _Brandobaris_ in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
>The decarbonization of the air is done through a mass decarbonization of the water.
But how? Does the ocean itself absorb carbon? And if so, does it have a natural resting point with an osmosis like process that will draw in more carbon naturally if we lower the available.levels?
[deleted] t1_j951xlc wrote
Reply to Diablo IV’s open beta starts next month by Sorin61
[deleted]
tinypolski t1_j951vx5 wrote
Reply to comment by Odd_Ingenuity8163 in MIT team makes a case for direct carbon capture from seawater, not air by MotorDrive
It really isn't funny. Almost no corporate sector actually incurs the expense of managing the damage that their "business" creates, environmental or otherwise. So some of the most damaging activities remain cheap because the true cost of them is transferred and/or deferred.
neuronexmachina t1_j95cntq wrote
Reply to comment by ActuatorMaterial2846 in UN says AI poses 'serious risk' for human rights by Circlemadeeverything
>However, my concern is the sophistication of the nueral networks that are no doubt classified, most definitely in the hands of government and military.
Makes me wonder how adept the massively-parallel machines the NSA uses to crack encryption are when repurposed for training LLMs and other neural nets.
Or heck, if they secretly have a functioning quantum computer, there's probably some pretty crazy capabilities when combined with transformers/etc.
(I had a link to an article about quantum transformers, but the auto-mod ate it)