Recent comments in /f/technology

Circlemadeeverything OP t1_j97daro wrote

So you say it spews bs. I say people believe bs. Now you say I’m claiming it can’t be used for fighting exploitation? When did I say that. I also said it is using what we ask it to learn and grow.

Where did I say a.i doesn’t have positive and negative consequences? You’re the one who mentioned chat gpt is bs. I just said many people can fall for bs

On a side note google has been working with the fbi for years with regards to data mining and sex trafficking.

1

DontListenToMe33 t1_j97cuzf wrote

Tying user verification to a subscription service just makes zero sense to me. I guess it’s good that meta will actually attempt to verify people - Twitter doesn’t bother (it’s a “pay us and we’ll give you a verified check for almost whatever name you want” system). But, generally speaking, why do I care about being verified? Literally makes no difference to me. Just seems like $100+ a year down the toilet.

The original Twitter Blue made more sense… it was like $5 a month for some extra features and no ads. Now, it’s more money + you still apparently get ads + the extra features are still crap.

1

Circlemadeeverything OP t1_j97beg6 wrote

Yes. But it’s not a.i. it’s basic coding and bots. They’ve been doing this before home computers even. Credit card companies were bragging they could tell with 99% accuracy who is going to get a divorce based on spending. They have been collecting data it’s just getting more widespread.

And it’s up to consumers to pass laws to protect themselves but our government only cares about protecting corporations and helping them exploit people in other countries

It’s sad to see the EU protecting their data a bit more than the US

1

DevAnalyzeOperate t1_j97b089 wrote

Lol complicated? Elon removed the censorship, and thus he removed the discrimination. This woman was part of the system to justify the perpetuation of discrimination and censorship. Not all that complicated. The complications you refer to are a bunch of bullshit.

If I'm going to do apologetics, Elon threw tens of billions of dollars down to end this discrimination which may have best gone towards better causes, and she didn't really have any opportunity to end discrimination like Elon could due to his stacks of cash, so one can see her as doing the best she could have done given the opportunity she had. But for her to act like what she was doing was somehow morally better than what's happening now mostly reflects the fact she's morally disgusting as are her pro-discrimination pro-censorship supporters.

−1