So you think that search engines should be considered illegal copyright infringement? You say that you're just referring to scraping content, which is a necessary part of how a search engine works. So I'm forced to assume that the answer is yes.

I'm not neglecting anything. I'm asking for some semblance of precision in defining model training out of fair use. The purpose and character of use, and the effect on the market are already factors in fair use decisions, but that's a lot more complicated of an issue than "AI models can't scrape content." It's specific to the application, and even for ChatGPT specifically, it would be pretty murky.

Apple stock in 2006, just before they released the iPhone. $2. Yes. It went up about 75x in that timeframe!

There are a lot of very rich and stupid people in the world.

A bit more than that actually.

That's not what I mean by precedent. I mean that there is no legal precedent.

Layers layers layers!

[removed]

Hell. To. The. Fucking. No.

I just don't understand rich people.

Not really, this is 100x more, the stock didn’t jump 100x

if they bought stock it would have been worth more.

Gonna be honest, if you're still around now and you don't run a business that needs to be publicly visible, I don't even know how you made it this far lmao

Can we all just agree to stop posting 743.6448 articles a day about Chat GPT?

Alternatively a filter to filter all of them out would be lovely too

It's not the metaverse. Fuck off media.

[deleted]

It turns out that chatGPT isn't actually an AI but just has well-trained staff in the background answering your prompts.

Tracking data is never going to help anyone quit. A person has to want to quit badly enough, and even then they need help sometimes like patches or nicotine gum. Data may be nice for scientists but it's useless for individuals. I am lucky - I have very strong willpower. When I decided to quit (a very long time ago) I just did it. It definitely wasn't easy but I am an incredibly stubborn person. I will not let anything or anyone beat me.

Just you in particular

flappy bird? xd

That’s 14x longer than I last!

But I reset quickly, it’s kinda my thing.

That is standard behavior with any sort of subscription service.

Technically thats not correct, its just very hard to enforce private use. For example, if you copy a movie, even for prvate use(except very specific circumstances) thats illegal, and people have been charged.

That said, the public release point is what I was thinking of anyway.

It’s been two and a half months. And it actually went down. My guess is once people started getting that 2nd charge

Yes but then they wouldn't have an excuse to create Spyware for your messaging apps so they can send data of your messages to the highest advertising bidder (Not to mention to the government to help control voting patterns) and pretend it's about keeping you safe.

I got downvoted in r/android for pointing out what's actually going on here. Its amazing how much "intellectuals" on this site feel the need to pretend corporations are altruistic.