There is a decent portion of internet articles and opinion pieces written by AI already . It's been happening for a few years. It's interesting that AI is teaching AI to be flawed

That assumes the average Joe cares enough to continue to be engaged despite the cost. Many people don’t give a shit and only use it as it’s free. Hopefully the beginning of their demise. Honestly the world was better before social media shit. Hopefully we are heading back there. Or at least meta crash and burns.

Yeah...... this is why I hate hipsters.

Lol. Would dump WhatsApp in a heartbeat too and go back to old fashioned phone. Only use it because it’s free. I don’t think it is worth any money per month.

Use your brain and maybe you'll figure out the connection between healthcare systems, capitalism and for profit corporations? Hello?

A Chinese person told me.

If it helps limit bay shit crazy Americans fall in to echo chambers and not vote for Donald trump or republican types I’m all for it.

I’m hoping they do too. I only keep it as business, events etc are so entwined with fb it is limiting not to have it. If they start charging hopefully this will change though and I will dump it in a heartbeat.

That's IT? The Model T of phones? Arguably one of the greatest inventions in the history of the planet sold for less than 7 figures?

We need more income inequality.

A lot of things have eclipsed zucc‘s vision for the metaverse decades ago. Garry‘s mod tower for example.

[deleted]

Wait I thought that the only way for it to be worth it was if you ARE notable, so you can protect your brand? Grandma doesn’t need the blue check but Volvo might

Or how to lose millions of users.

Lol, if you think these huge companies don't have teams of lawyers advising them on how to legally create models, you're nuts. OpenAI has everything to gain and nothing to lose by trying to challenge the precedents that are already set.

But keep doing your own research. Maybe they'll hire you (or maybe they already do)

Lol, you're the one bringing search engines into this for some reason. It's a disingenuous argument and way off base from my point, which is why I'm not responding to it. You've also found all my comments and responded to them agressuvely like a good shill

Soon enough we will get to ignore it. This reminds me of self driving cars in 2015 reddit got flooded with wierd hypebeasts and then the tech progress slowed way down.

The hype is reaching unrealistic levels. Subreddits dedicated to chatgtp and bing are essentially cults who believe its sentient at this point. Soon we will get to the trough of disappointment as this tech gets deployed to the general public and people start finding its faults

This is what happens when stupid people "do their own research"

[removed]

Technically, if you bought the movie, you could copy it for your own use. You just can't share it, which to your point is very hard to enforce for private use outside of the internet.

I'm thinking of fair use when I say "do whatever they want with copyright privately"

Ah. I had that. Confirned on the 15 minutes or less. It lasts ahalf a day if you didnt use it.. An original phone would pillow by now. Haha..

[deleted]

Except that’s what was missing from your original point, but either way I gave you a starting point… if it’s beneficial for both parties and both parties consent (which content site operators do via robot.txt instructions), no one has a problem. In the AI case it’s beneficial to the AI creator/owner but harmful to the content owner since the AI is competing with them by using their content, so it shouldn’t be considered free use.

I think the current volume of ChatGPT articles would actually be tolerable if the media would actually focus on interesting aspects of the subject. But they just keep playing the same four notes over and over agin. At least this one isn't "<recognizable name in tech> thinks <opinion> about ChatGPT, but also says <slightly different opinion>"

[removed]

God forbid anyone actually read our articles. After all, what are headlines for?