Recent comments in /f/television
NewClayburn t1_j699t93 wrote
Reply to In what ways do you think "second screening" has changed what shows get made, how they're shot/put together, and what shows get popular? by bqzs
I hate how it's a self-fulfilling prophecy. You might not find something particularly engaging and you slip out your phone, but then you aren't paying attention enough that it will ever be engaging to you. So even if you try to put the phone away and pay attention, you'll lose interest because you missed out on becoming invested in the character and stories since you were looking at your phone.
Bright_Beat_5981 t1_j699psi wrote
Reply to comment by Cool-Ad8928 in Is Seinfeld kind of a flop for Netflix? by BitterEditor22
Like when netflix put all their new big shows on billboards instead of seinfeld? Premiere in 5 days , dont cancel your subscription.
tinoynk t1_j6997ek wrote
Reply to comment by Locke108 in For All Mankind: Is it always this depressing? by No-Touchy
Ahhhh yea that one is rough
puckeredstarfish69 t1_j698uw6 wrote
Reply to A different take on Velma by HBO by borek87
You seem completely sane
UskyldigeX t1_j6982bs wrote
Reply to comment by khroshan in Why is Jack Ryan S3 so terrible? by khroshan
They also had no reason to go to Greece. They could have gone straight back to the navy ship they came from.
Locke108 t1_j697wfh wrote
Reply to comment by tinoynk in For All Mankind: Is it always this depressing? by No-Touchy
Episode 8 of season 1 is the one about the Baldwin son though. But you’re right, other than that storyline, the show’s not dark.
urgasmic t1_j697tml wrote
the characters sucked so it was hard to invest in the experiment.
NewClayburn t1_j697ks8 wrote
As I replied to one of the promotional tweets, I think the gimmick is really interesting and would be perfect if applied to an intriguing and engaging TV show such as 1899.
The show itself was fairly typical/expected, but it was still entertaining and well done. Just your typical cheap TV viewing, like The Recruit or whatever else. I wouldn't say it was bad, but it isn't anything to care about.
Still I think the gimmick has some potential if used on something better and where the story lends itself to randomized telling.
rabiddog20xx t1_j697gop wrote
Reply to A different take on Velma by HBO by borek87
I think it’s incredibly cringe worthy but I still watch it… I never go into anything with any expectations. I find it hilarious that norville is against drugs and his father looks like a true shaggy interpretation. Half of the students are always high and it reminds me of what my high school was like
Scotsmania t1_j696xlj wrote
It's a realistic alternate universe to the one you are currently living in where events unfolded a bit differently. Watch something else if you want to lift her spirits.
cohrt t1_j696wvd wrote
Reply to comment by im_a_dick_head in ABC News Breaks Up With Amy Robach, T.J. Holmes Over Off-Camera Affair by Jeffmister
Because they were both married to other people while the affair was going on.
Lobotomist t1_j696nu0 wrote
Reply to A different take on Velma by HBO by borek87
Its one of those shows where you are not sure if the creators are super sublime satirists of today's ( wokeist ) culture , or just bumbling idiots
And truly the best works of satire often are this way.
We will never know if its genius or shit. And its really up to everyone to decide by them selves.
( I know panic is already setting in , seeing that collective mind will be unable to guide you on this one. But you are on your own kid... on this one )
[deleted] t1_j696jbk wrote
Reply to comment by StuffonBookshelfs in For All Mankind: Is it always this depressing? by No-Touchy
[deleted]
TheQuantumLeaper t1_j696gap wrote
Reply to comment by StandardBoah in What do people think about Kaleidoscope on Netflix? by StandardBoah
The episode order is randomized per account, with the final episode always being the same. So, if you have four profiles on that one account, you'd all have the same order, but your neighbor with their own account might have a different order than yours.
anasui1 t1_j695v7l wrote
Reply to A different take on Velma by HBO by borek87
that's the pettiest thing I've read this year, and basically boils down to "anyone who doesn't like Velma is a - ist asshole". Like a reverse Critical Drinker video, but at least the Scotch is funny because he doesn't take himself that seriously
midasp t1_j6950fw wrote
Ultimately, the first two seasons were about people coming together to get things accomplished.
bngarland t1_j694zew wrote
Reply to A different take on Velma by HBO by borek87
I am currently on a mission yo watch every episode of every scooby doo show (I'm not much of a movie person but I've seen my fair share). I was excited about velma when I saw it was coming out because it was different. However, after watching the first 2 episodes I had a knee-jerk reaction like everyone else did that it was an awful show. I kept watching when new episodes came out and it's actually not as bad as the first two episodes make it seem. Is it great not by any stretch but does it deserve this much hate no. It as pretty easy to just move along and watch what you want to watch instead of hating on a show that isn't even finished yet.
StuffonBookshelfs t1_j694t6n wrote
Reply to comment by tinoynk in For All Mankind: Is it always this depressing? by No-Touchy
It does have so much hope.
StuffonBookshelfs t1_j694rbd wrote
If you think it’s depressing now, then yes. It will always be depressing.
People are always going to die for space exploration. That’s part of space exploration. And that’s not just this show. But any show that’s even close to realistic about the cutting edge of space technology. It’s incredibly dangerous.
anasui1 t1_j694jpt wrote
dozens and dozens, which would be a pretty long and boring list, from Alec Guinness in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy to Olivia Colman in anything she's ever done (even her early Mitchell & Webb "numberwang" sketches), Stephen Rea in The Honourable Woman, the entire cast of TNG and DS9, James Gandolfini in The Sopranos, Steve Coogan as Partridge, Jared Harris in The Crown, Hugh Laurie in House, David Suchet in Poirot...
jimflaigle t1_j694ghc wrote
I had to go on a crash diet last year to get my blood pressure down to a sane number, and I've been avoiding travel shows because they always have tons of food I would desperately prefer to salad. Have the recent episodes held up?
Starbuck522 t1_j6945xg wrote
Reply to comment by jogoso2014 in What do people think about Kaleidoscope on Netflix? by StandardBoah
I think the heist was shown as a flashback.
[deleted] t1_j69455f wrote
Reply to comment by StandardBoah in What do people think about Kaleidoscope on Netflix? by StandardBoah
[removed]
tinoynk t1_j6944fh wrote
Surprised to hear you guys are finding it depressing/dark. Maybe it's because all the other stuff I watch, but I find watching likeable mostly good people working hard to solve problems the opposite of depressing.
Yea situations get intense and dire, and there's high stakes, but depressing/dark/dour? Not to me. If anything I find the idea of a reality were government cares at least a tiny bit about scientific progress incredibly invigorating, but maybe those elements don't come into play until a bit later.
wildadragon t1_j69bzai wrote
Reply to What if Superbowl commercials for once will have no celebrities and just be regular instead? by trover2345325
Well there were all the iconic Budweiser commercials that didn't have celebrities. The Clydesdales, the frogs, the Bud Bowl.