Recent comments in /f/television

tlvrtm OP t1_j6p2awe wrote

I don’t actually think they’re aware, a few go along with it but she’s not that well known and I bet the BBC just arranged the interviews saying it was for a documentary.

And yeah I’ve had 2-3 times where I just felt plain bad for the interviewee (when she’s being kinda rude to them) but I felt they worked well otherwise.

8

TatteredCarcosa t1_j6p1z68 wrote

Cunk is an amazing character. I hate the interview segments though, so much sympathetic embarrassment for me. Her performance is hilarious and the voice over bits and documentary parody are dead on, but goddamn I cringe into a ball watching her talk to actual experts. I know they are aware it's a joke and no one is being mocked or actually embarrassed, but it just makes me so tense to see.

Edit: Even through the immense discomfort "So King Arthur came a lot, didn't he?," absolutely floored me laughing.

73

UskyldigeX t1_j6p16st wrote

I've had this since last year and it's a bit disappointing. Not a lot of content and new episodes arrive weeks after their American premieres.

EDIT: and subtitle support is weirdly sporadic. I understand that Danish subtitles aren't always available but half the Star Trek TNG episodes don't have English subtitles. I'm fairly sure those have existed for decades.

1

Pretty_Garbage8380 t1_j6p0z8f wrote

The shows that I absolutely enjoy are the ones that had me from the start. I am slow to start and I always miss the trends, so after years of dismissing Naruto as "kid stuff," I tried it out a few weeks ago and have already gone through 100+ episodes.

I know what I like better than anyone. People recommend these newer shows to me all the time, but they never bother to understand what I like as an individual. So, I will watch a few minutes, or one episode, but my joys in life are so specific to me that it doesn't take hours for me to know if I am enjoying myself.

I am the same with video games.

4

MasqureMan t1_j6oznl6 wrote

I give credit for making a clickbait title with an actual well written article to back it up. However, this reads like episode 3 being well done is a weakness rather than a strength. I had no idea where the story would go. I didn’t know they would end up lovers until the piano scene. I didn’t know if there’d be betrayal, heartbreak, or if the raiders would get them. I didn’t know if they’d both make it. Yet you’re rooting for 2 people in an apocalypse regardless of the morbid possibilities.

If someone tells you, “that’s been done before”, you tell them, “Well, I haven’t done it before”. No ones gonna deliver the same idea in the exact same way, especially in a collaborative work. I’m glad we got the episode that we got.

1

ffxivthrowaway03 t1_j6oyj8d wrote

I think the fact that it did take up so much time is explicitly why it detracts from it.

For the majority of the hour we totally lost the plot and were watching something else. Maybe if they actually inserted some apocalypse into that hour it would have detracted less, but if you photoshopped the fence out of the background maybe five minutes of the whole thing still would have had anything to do with the setting and events of the show at large.

As someone else in another thread had said, you could've swapped the setting to a cabin in the remote woods instead of the fungus apocalypse and literally nothing else would have had to been changed about the whole flashback. It's like the whole apocalypse never happened for the entire flashback, it barely impacted them at all, and the one time it directly did (the raiders) they used it as a fake out two seconds later and surprise! Bill is totally fine from that gut shot while Frank is now dying of a terminal illness and they lived happily ever after.

Like there's a compelling love story being told here, but it sure as shit didn't have a thing to do with "The Last Of Us." beyond cribbing the setting and vague ideas of a couple minor characters then doing literally nothing relevant with either.

−5

kevlarbuns t1_j6oxzni wrote

I think the thing that made it notable in a series that is known for being pretty stark and not very uplifting is that ultimately Bill and Frank won. The audience already knows that Joel is a person who has no hope for anyone, let alone himself. He's a survivor who's walled himself off from nearly everyone around him. He doesn't even think twice about justifying killing Ellie when he points out to Tess that she's gonna have a shit future anyway and he's probably doing her a merciful deed.

Bill did what Joel has failed twice at. But Bill showed that it can be done, and people can still win. One of the final scenes where Joel asks to see Ellie's bite again is him looking one more time before he lets himself make a leap of faith. And none of that would have been possible without seeing that Bill and Frank not only carved out something functional, but something that they clearly both loved.

2