Recent comments in /f/television

Paula-Abdul-Jabbar OP t1_jdwsrua wrote

This is one of my biggest gripes on Reddit as a whole. I've seen way too many posts and comments griping about how X character is a narcissist, sociopath, bully, etc. for their actions as if they're real people and not characters purposefully written that way for comedic effect. Yeah it would probably be a little annoying if I had a friend as sarcastic as Chandler in real life...but it's a TV show.

37

iamdew802 t1_jdwsdrm wrote

I thought it was ok but the first episode gave me no sense of direction for the over-arching plot. Reading the description I thought it would be about a character’s descent into madness (maybe is?) but then watched the first episode and it seems like a dark comedy? My main takeaway from the first episode is that I feel bad for his wife lol

11

Confident-Lab3702 t1_jdwrs5v wrote

I think maybe audiences in general are drifting away a little bit from the "joke-a-minute" style of sitcom writing. Maybe the current onslaught of prestige, character-driven dramas have whet our appetite for slower paced character-driven humor.

For example, one of my favorite comedies in recent years is Search Party, and even though the writing is still pretty damn solid, it's a series mostly carried by acting and characters as opposed to funny one-liners. Meredith Hagner and John Early in particular are AMAZING, and their performance and delivery is what makes the humor work, oftentimes more than the lines themselves. In the hands of lesser actors, it wouldn't have been as effective.

8

dasheeshblahzen t1_jdwqtx5 wrote

idk, just because people don't talk about it on the internet doesn't mean people don't talk about the shows irl. it's funny some football and baseball teams will have a social media person interview the players for instagram and they'll ask random questions like "who do you want to see in concert?" or "what's your favorite tv show?" dexter is probably the most popular answer.

1

Ok_Broccoli_4783 t1_jdwqhm6 wrote

A recent show that has at sitcom-esque feeling to it that has had success with setting up a brilliant group of characters, and character dynamics, is Shrinking. At the end of the first season I feel it managed the set-up of a first season perfect, with some focus on plot, but not so much that it takes away from developing the characters and the group

6

Latter_Feeling2656 t1_jdwq3cd wrote

>Also, there was fewer competition, only a few networks, so people gave them time and patience because they didn't have 25 different choices.

One problem is dispersal of talent. it's always been that popular shows lost their creative people, but now there's fifty outlets throwing money at writers. it's tough to keep a team together.

8

Latter_Feeling2656 t1_jdwpa99 wrote

The genre really can lose its sense of humor. if you look at the late 60s, the funny sitcom almost died out, to be replaced by pleasant, unoffensive, but dull family fare. Even existing shows that had been funny early on, like My Three Sons and the Andy Griffith Show, just stopped trying to go for funniest. Then like a bolt from the blue, shows emerged again with broad characters who went for it - Mary Tyler Moore Show, All in the Family, The Odd Couple, Sanford and Son, MASH - it was an avalanche.

if you go into a sub for many shows, even older ones, it seems like at least the Reddit portion of the audience is quite humor impaired. Many posts express disapproval of acts, and even characters, as if the shows were somehow presented as exemplars of proper conduct. Comedy can't just run free if the writer has to keep that sort of audience in mind.

25