Recent comments in /f/tifu

NeroVol t1_j1g2duy wrote

Candidacy.

And I totally feel you, for the first 4 years of my thesis I had issues with worrying about others thoughts of me until an upper year student heard me talk and said to me "what makes you convinced they are spending time thinking about that aspect about you, rather than something else."

I would be willing to bet that if the professors thought anything, it was for a fleeting moment. They are in your field because they love the topic, and they are professors because they love to teach, and they are YOUR committee specifically because they like you and want to watch you grow and see who you will become. I doubt any of them are passing negative judgment about you, and if they are, they will give you constructive feedback because they want to help you and watch you grow and thrive!

Edit1: I forgot to mention, WAY TO GO ACHIEVING CANDIDACY! This is an accomplishment that only a small percentage of the world attempt and achieve. You are well on your way to adding to humanities knowledge!

8

askingrytquestions OP t1_j1g1cai wrote

>Mine lasted at least 2 hrs

really, was it candidacy or defence?

> , but next time I would recommend not altering your state of mind with medications/substances, the risk is too great.

yeah, some lessons learned for the long term but for the short term, I really need to get rid of this embarrassment somehow. I am constantly thinking about what others r thinking of me.

2

alaveria t1_j1g0oxd wrote

It’s really not as bad as it feels! i’d just think you had a lot to say about your research and there’s nothing wrong with that. They could have stopped you at any time.

In a while you’ll see it as a funny story! I doubt anyone will even think about it tomorrow. They’re not worrying about it so you don’t need to either. Also you passed, which it great! well done

5

NeroVol t1_j1g00pj wrote

40 mins???!!! Mine lasted at least 2 hrs, I'm surprised yours was expected to be so short. Anywho, 2x the time doesn't seem significant to me given that the expectation was that it be so short. Also, those are soft limits, usually put in place by the program to give some guidance, as long as your committee stayed engaged and didn't complain, then they were onboard with it continuing at the pace it was, but next time I would recommend not altering your state of mind with medications/substances, the risk is too great.

17

askingrytquestions OP t1_j1fzgpb wrote

They didn't say anything except that one of the jury members remarked that this was the longest candidacy talk he has ever been to.

No one watches the video but some of my colleagues were present, so they have something funny to talk about me I guess and I am left with this embarrassing memory.

13

Embarrassed-Bus-8591 t1_j1fy4fm wrote

Commenting because you asked.

Never deviate from your normal routine during important events. Your normal routine should be enough to get you through whatever your are doing: competitions, exams, etc. if it isn’t enough, change it, but don’t change things the day of. Doing so runs the risk of introducing change that can negatively affect you. Even things like eating breakfast before your exams (when you don’t normally do so) could give you IBS or taking medication that you don’t normally use can harm your ability to focus or forget things.

204