I’ve been drunk lots of times, and I have never assaulted anyone. That’s not an excuse.

Your dad sounds sweet RIP

X to doubt

His feelings after the fact don't change the horrible things the victum feels. Stop defending this rapist.

Why the fuck are you defending a rapist?

I've posted pictures of myself on here before. There's a recent one from a few days ago. This is my public profile.

[removed]

No, he was simply a first relationship. I met him online through a friend and dated him for a month online before I met him in person when he dumped me for looking my age (16). He started trying to hook up with my younger friend that looked 10. He was nearly 19.

At least 3 women I know would love that as a gift

Straight out of a sitcom (HIMYM comes to mind). Calling BS.

Ok but we’re missing the part where he says HE WAS DRUNK. In no way was that justification for what he did but gaining consent when you’re drunk isn’t legally possible because you’re impaired to whatever extent do you understand that?? Rather than bashing and judging getting the guy help is more important

Omg I'm ngl that's a great start to a relationship. And hey at least he tried!!! Thoughtful in his own way ☺️🤣

I agree. She’s been assaulted before, and she told this to him in confidence, and trusted him. He then turns around and makes her worst nightmare come true: Sexual assault from a “friend.” That’s something a monster would do.

I need to slow down reading. I thought the beginning said your gf was 16 and you were 63🤦🏽‍♂️

Dude. No.

If anything you cheating on your gf in the first place was the real fuck up that led to all the other fuck ups.

Jesus, i think you won STD bingo

Like you’re being a complete scumbag to someone you don’t know and have no right to be, you aren’t the victim, you aren’t the cops and you aren’t him so take your shit and rant on someone else’s fucking thread

Yeah see that would be okay to say if he wasn’t accepting guilt and seeking penance but you’re being a complete pile of trash to someone who’s not a repeat offender ( from what we know) so saying this only pushes to the extreme of what can happen and not the healthy outcome

Just gonna say you can’t call them a “pro” if they gave you a STI.

So he’d be guilty by all accounts in America unless there was compelling evidence that she gave physical consent. But what I’m saying is that he did what he did while he was drunk (him getting consent wouldn’t make a difference because he’s drunk) and because of the physical and mental impairment that comes with being inebriated prevents logical decision making

I like this idea! And I think your niece will enjoy your "fibs" just as much LOL

[deleted]

Love it! Have a good one

So I’m confused does this mean he’s automatically guilty or innocent?