Recent comments in /f/tifu

DeeZyWrecker t1_ja2yujb wrote

Uh... that's not the point? If this was a question of who's right or wrong, then in case she actually is running with the kid, we would have to ask HIM to not say "I fucked up by accidentally texting her" (let alone me saying he fucked up), because who cares what she feels about the text if she's really doing it?

"Fucking up" in this context has nothing to do with right or wrong, it only concerns how smoothly a certain isolated situation could've gone instead of how it did, and to me, it would've been better if he just told her straight, than to say it accidentally. He's not wrong, he's a victim, and if she in fact is leaving the country, then well, yeah, she is wrong.

0

TAOJeff t1_ja2yu6k wrote

Yes, especially if she's got the same surname as the kids. If the surnames are different, there is additional paperwork required to prove it isn't a kidnapping. I know someone who kept her married name for this reason.

But yes, it's very easy for a parent to move countries with a child leaving the other parent with bugger all legal options. While there is usually a requirement for a work/permanent VISA, the parent in question doesn't need to tell anyone about it, and the country issuing it isn't going to tell anyone if they are asked.

I say a VISA is usually required, there are situations where you can request asylum in a destination country. Everyone is immediately going to think of refugees in sinking boats trying to enter the EU or something like that. The problem the refugees in boats usually have is, they have passed through other countries. If you want refugee status, you have to ask in the first country you get to. (Example : If you were fleeing Liberia and boarded a plan that landed in Ghana and you then got onto another flight to the UK. The UK will tell you to piss off, because you should have asked Ghana)

There are cases where the opposite happens, family is leaving the country, so they go to the airport, parents board the plan and leave the kids behind. Yes, am aware that sounds made up, but it isn't and it's worse than you think because it was in a country with no social services nor any kind of facility that could assist.

4

ErnieAdamsistheKey t1_ja2yad0 wrote

Unless you are absurdly wealthy and can have your wedding at a 3 Michelin star restaurant, the caterers are not going to execute anything near haute cuisine. I have been to very expensive weddings where this was tried with caterer and I can still recall the trauma I had over the texture of the pretentious ravioli. Your fiancée’s dad is right. Sorry.

2

Layne205 t1_ja2x25z wrote

Because scavenging is already a fireable offense. All the people saying "do the right thing" have obviously never had a job before. That is absolutely not how it works. You can risk being caught, or be fired immediately. Which is better?

1

DeeZyWrecker t1_ja2wvq2 wrote

You fucked up earlier by not discussing it with her. I mean, I know she's your ex, but we should just get people used to being open and honest about everything. It's obviously a thought that you couldn't repress or dismiss, let's be honest, so let it out (and I can't blame you, I mean dude, a passport for a 5 year old as an ID and not a normal state ID? That's suspicious, if not a dead-give-away)

Could've just brought it up to her on the phone or in person, directly and in very simple and friendly words. Or just ask "Why a passport and not a state ID?" without stating it completely. She'd do the math. Anyways, I hope everything's good, although I think the reason she didn't text back is because she was exposed. Wonder how things went.

−3