Recent comments in /f/todayilearned

Apellosine t1_j6vyhmp wrote

2

jabbadarth t1_j6vld16 wrote

They won in 90 and were the second to last Canadian team to win the cup. The Canadiens won in 93 and no Canadian team has won since then.

Also potentially important to note that the oilers had won 4 championships with Gretzky in the years prior to the trade. So maybe they keep him.and win more but also they could have thought he was already 9 years into his career and why not sell when he's still hot not realizing he would continue to be an amazing player for another decade+.

1

jonhasglasses t1_j6uzclg wrote

If you look back at my original comment I wasn’t conflating the two. I was making a comment how the use of impact is an interesting choice because as I know it (and as Stanford has published) sports teams and stadiums don’t have a positive impact on local economies. I didn’t spell it out further but I felt that was a relevant piece of information to the discussion of the economic impact of the Super Bowl.

1

chris622 t1_j6uumlm wrote

3

jaypenn3 t1_j6udpfz wrote

6

ForgotMyOldLoginInfo t1_j6tyqj8 wrote

6

Free_hugs_for_3fiddy t1_j6ty2rt wrote

Yeah but it's crazy what "impact" is. From what I've heard from relatives, pretty much every hotel has jacked the fuck up their prices. Even shitty motels are charging $700+ a night if they are even remotely close to the stadium.

And some businesses are closing their offices for a few weeks and having employees WFO because all of their parking is being forfeit for this as well.

Sure would suck for anyone visiting the city for any other reason than Superbowl around this time.

3