Recent comments in /f/vermont
pondusedtobeupthere t1_j3un1jv wrote
Reply to comment by browsing_around in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
My understanding as well growing up.
syphax t1_j3uldsb wrote
Reply to comment by Nutmegdog1959 in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
Interesting re: Plug Power; I live a couple miles from their electrolyzer facility in MA. And my company has looked at their stuff for forklifts; that's a pretty good use case for them.
Nutmegdog1959 t1_j3ukrc9 wrote
Reply to comment by syphax in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
Ha, ha, ha! People think all you gotta do is dig a trench and drop the wire off the poles, not quite as easy as that. Cost varies wildly from rural to city, but fact is, where ever you are, it ain't cheap! And you're right, everybody winds up paying.
Public utilities are what keeps housing expensive. People are funny, they get accustomed to lights, heat, fresh water and sewers and of course internet and cell phone.
I was an early investor in Plug Power 25 yrs ago. They are a hydrogen fuel cell developer. Their goal was to build fuel cells that could power a 3br 1200 sq' house with a 1.5kw hydrogen fuel cell. The goal was, "The size of a washing machine price $5,000." (never quite got there. more like $25k-$50k powering remote cell towers and now indoor forklifts)
Anyway, off grid electric power technology would do wonders to open up huge amounts of land currently not financially suitable for development. Would reduce housing crisis dramatically in VT and across the country. I'm still waiting for this paradigm shift.
fjwjr t1_j3ujrav wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
Did you mean “Why doesn’t Vermont Barre its power lines?”
pils-nerd t1_j3ujc4y wrote
Reply to comment by zarnov in Winter heating cost survey: Last month how much do you pay, what source, how much space, and what temp? by Ok_Slice_2952
Yeah, it's not great in the winter since we run the heat pump plus electric (heat pump) hot water, but during summer our electric is close to zero.
WorkingMinute7127 t1_j3uj6kl wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
In the 70s Rockefeller paid to have the lines buried/removed from the main streets in Woodstock
contrary-contrarian t1_j3uiwix wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
You clearly have never tried to dig a hole in Vermont.
seanwalter123 t1_j3uin4v wrote
Reply to comment by Southern-Fox6524 in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
You ever have to deal with a fault in the ground? It’s about 1000% harder to deal with and identify.
swarm32 t1_j3uht4n wrote
Reply to comment by NonDeterministiK in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
Historical areas grants plus old money plus the middle of town isn’t completely a slab of granite.
browsing_around t1_j3uh304 wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
The rockefellers paid for it to be done in Woodstock I was told.
Eagle_Arm t1_j3ugtqi wrote
Reply to comment by Southern-Fox6524 in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
>it’s definitely more expensive to have to annually fix these things and send out the manpower from other agencies to deal with the emergencies.
Is it now? Please tell me where you got this definitely true fact.
Eagle_Arm t1_j3ugl34 wrote
Reply to comment by Southern-Fox6524 in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
You ever dig a hole in Vermont?
syphax t1_j3ug3t9 wrote
Reply to comment by Nutmegdog1959 in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
I typically see a range of 3-5x more for buried vs overhead, but these numbers are in the right ballpark (btw $100/ft works out to $528k per mile). In my town in MA, we used to be able to install underground for $1-2M per mile (mid 2010's), but it's probably crept up since then.
And because Vermont is rural, infrastructure that is network-based is expensive per capita (many miles to cover, not so many people). My neighbor in VT 2 doors down got a quote for running electrical service (which currently stops at the house in between ours); it was something like $100k. So, he decided to go off the grid: solar, small wind turbine, batteries. It was cheaper.
endeavour3d t1_j3ug1cs wrote
Reply to comment by Southern-Fox6524 in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
you might want to look up the GDP of California and it's tax base and compare it to Vermont
IndigoHG t1_j3uef8d wrote
Reply to comment by burgerbingbettuce in Black girls of VT: Where do you get your hair done/hair supplies? by burgerbingbettuce
CurlyProverbz is on yt, her hair care is all Ayurvedic, but stuff that's easily gettable. You probably already have a lot of it in your kitchen! She's fabulous!
Corey307 t1_j3ue4t4 wrote
Reply to comment by Twombls in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
Vermont doesn’t seem to have a lot of forest fires because our forests are still green, West Coast forests are tinder boxes and have been browning for decades so fires are a constant problem. Another issue is the massive development in areas that are naturally prone to wildfires and where things are worsened by people being there.
Corey307 t1_j3udqd1 wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
OP you’re the one that brought up climate change, bearing powerlines wouldn’t just be expensive but it would generate a great deal of pollution. All that digging is done by gas and diesel powered vehicles. Plus I looked it up, the old above ground lines cannot be repurposed for underground usage since they give off heat so you’re talking about scrapping all the powerlines in the state. Yes it would get recycled but recycling isn’t free, removing, transporting and recycling the lines burns fossil fuels. So your plan to future proof for climate change worsens climate change.
The recent statewide power outages we’re wild and yes most of it could’ve been avoided with buried power lines. But I kept track of the outages and 99% of the state had its power restored within three days, my house took two. And talking to people have been here longer than me this doesn’t seem like a common problem where half of the houses in the state lose power. This state doesn’t have a lot of money and burying powerlines cost several times more than above ground powerlines so that expense is going to get passed on to the average citizen to solve for an in frequent and very short term problem.
Old_Ad_1301 t1_j3udijv wrote
Reply to comment by Southern-Fox6524 in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
This isn't California, In cali, that downed line could burn counties and towns, that's expensive for the power companies insurance, here, it's just a few thousand people losing power, cheaper to fix it when it breaks
amoebashephard t1_j3ud8aq wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
California buries it's power lines not because of the cost but because the cost point was decades of fires caused by faulty power lines. The northeast may start doing that in the future, with how uncertain climate change makes things
NonDeterministiK t1_j3ucbtu wrote
Reply to comment by ziggygersh in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
Grafton (pop 650?) has also buried most of its in town power lines
grimmfarmer t1_j3uc9lr wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
Frost heaves? I'm sure modern practice is to bury lines in flexible jacketing and address the ingress into buildings better, but I've worked in a situation where buried conduit was clearly compromised at two sites, causing water (and mud) to pour into multiple buildings. That said, my neighborhood has buried electrical mains.
[deleted] t1_j3uc9k6 wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
[deleted]
sad0panda t1_j3ubpl4 wrote
Reply to Winter heating cost survey: Last month how much do you pay, what source, how much space, and what temp? by Ok_Slice_2952
2000 sq foot log cabin with insulated roof. Oil and propane. Primarily use propane, about $250/mo average across a Rinnai wall heater (basement, used sparingly) and a faux wood stove (main floor). Keep it between 70-75 when this is running.
Oil forced hot air furnace backup. 275 gal tank, fill it once a season. So an extra ~$60/month across 12 months since I filled it at >$5/gal most recently.
Furnace is set at 60 most of the time, use it to warm the house to 70 in the morning and then propane rest of the day unless it's a super cold day.
Have good southern exposure, this can keep us from using the stove on a sunny day even in winter.
ItalynSausageXL t1_j3ubgt5 wrote
Reply to Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
Money for sure. And as one dude said on here it’s easier to go thru the terrain vs dig underground. Mayyybe in Northern VT (St. Albans area) since it’s flatter terrain and less rocky.
star_tyger t1_j3unhs5 wrote
Reply to comment by Corey307 in Why doesn’t Vermont bury its power lines? by tcchen
I don't agree that it's a short-term problem. Historical data doesn't mean much given climate change. I agree that burying power lines isn't a cheap or simple solution, and I'm not arguing for it. However, it would be reasonable to expect storms and power outages to get worse.