Recent comments in /f/vermont

star_tyger t1_j3unhs5 wrote

I don't agree that it's a short-term problem. Historical data doesn't mean much given climate change. I agree that burying power lines isn't a cheap or simple solution, and I'm not arguing for it. However, it would be reasonable to expect storms and power outages to get worse.

4

Nutmegdog1959 t1_j3ukrc9 wrote

Ha, ha, ha! People think all you gotta do is dig a trench and drop the wire off the poles, not quite as easy as that. Cost varies wildly from rural to city, but fact is, where ever you are, it ain't cheap! And you're right, everybody winds up paying.

Public utilities are what keeps housing expensive. People are funny, they get accustomed to lights, heat, fresh water and sewers and of course internet and cell phone.

I was an early investor in Plug Power 25 yrs ago. They are a hydrogen fuel cell developer. Their goal was to build fuel cells that could power a 3br 1200 sq' house with a 1.5kw hydrogen fuel cell. The goal was, "The size of a washing machine price $5,000." (never quite got there. more like $25k-$50k powering remote cell towers and now indoor forklifts)

Anyway, off grid electric power technology would do wonders to open up huge amounts of land currently not financially suitable for development. Would reduce housing crisis dramatically in VT and across the country. I'm still waiting for this paradigm shift.

3

syphax t1_j3ug3t9 wrote

I typically see a range of 3-5x more for buried vs overhead, but these numbers are in the right ballpark (btw $100/ft works out to $528k per mile). In my town in MA, we used to be able to install underground for $1-2M per mile (mid 2010's), but it's probably crept up since then.

And because Vermont is rural, infrastructure that is network-based is expensive per capita (many miles to cover, not so many people). My neighbor in VT 2 doors down got a quote for running electrical service (which currently stops at the house in between ours); it was something like $100k. So, he decided to go off the grid: solar, small wind turbine, batteries. It was cheaper.

8

Corey307 t1_j3ue4t4 wrote

Vermont doesn’t seem to have a lot of forest fires because our forests are still green, West Coast forests are tinder boxes and have been browning for decades so fires are a constant problem. Another issue is the massive development in areas that are naturally prone to wildfires and where things are worsened by people being there.

6

Corey307 t1_j3udqd1 wrote

OP you’re the one that brought up climate change, bearing powerlines wouldn’t just be expensive but it would generate a great deal of pollution. All that digging is done by gas and diesel powered vehicles. Plus I looked it up, the old above ground lines cannot be repurposed for underground usage since they give off heat so you’re talking about scrapping all the powerlines in the state. Yes it would get recycled but recycling isn’t free, removing, transporting and recycling the lines burns fossil fuels. So your plan to future proof for climate change worsens climate change.

The recent statewide power outages we’re wild and yes most of it could’ve been avoided with buried power lines. But I kept track of the outages and 99% of the state had its power restored within three days, my house took two. And talking to people have been here longer than me this doesn’t seem like a common problem where half of the houses in the state lose power. This state doesn’t have a lot of money and burying powerlines cost several times more than above ground powerlines so that expense is going to get passed on to the average citizen to solve for an in frequent and very short term problem.

20

amoebashephard t1_j3ud8aq wrote

California buries it's power lines not because of the cost but because the cost point was decades of fires caused by faulty power lines. The northeast may start doing that in the future, with how uncertain climate change makes things

−2

grimmfarmer t1_j3uc9lr wrote

Frost heaves? I'm sure modern practice is to bury lines in flexible jacketing and address the ingress into buildings better, but I've worked in a situation where buried conduit was clearly compromised at two sites, causing water (and mud) to pour into multiple buildings. That said, my neighborhood has buried electrical mains.

10

sad0panda t1_j3ubpl4 wrote

2000 sq foot log cabin with insulated roof. Oil and propane. Primarily use propane, about $250/mo average across a Rinnai wall heater (basement, used sparingly) and a faux wood stove (main floor). Keep it between 70-75 when this is running.

Oil forced hot air furnace backup. 275 gal tank, fill it once a season. So an extra ~$60/month across 12 months since I filled it at >$5/gal most recently.

Furnace is set at 60 most of the time, use it to warm the house to 70 in the morning and then propane rest of the day unless it's a super cold day.

Have good southern exposure, this can keep us from using the stove on a sunny day even in winter.

1