Recent comments in /f/vermont
[deleted] t1_j6olc4r wrote
Reply to comment by vttale in Lake Willoughby this morning by Elton507
[removed]
BreadTruckToast t1_j6okfa9 wrote
Reply to comment by friendofmany in Fidium experience in Montpelier by __j0sh__
We get flyers for fidium in the mail in Montpelier. I would hope they have service here though it’d be hysterical if they’re wasting mailers on a non serviced area.
Disastrous-Baker-914 t1_j6ok3ak wrote
All the older vermonters are republican they just don't vote so all the young people overwhelmed the graph
Such-Evidence-4745 t1_j6ojwm6 wrote
Reply to comment by Cease_Cows_ in who recently got a heating oil bill? by lottabigbluewater
A lot of high efficiency stuff seems like that. Looks good on paper but the more complex design seems to break more often and there don't seem to be any techs who know how they work. My parents had a high end boiler installed and it took them along time to find some one who could actually service it instead of just randomly swapping parts. And the thing had issues like 2 years after they got it. Who cares how efficient something is if its broken all the time?
Didn't know that heat pumps were the same deal though, sounds worse to be honest.
TheTowerBard t1_j6oi1md wrote
Reply to comment by 1DollarOr1Million in 2 Rutland Drug Stabbings in 2 days. 1 left dead by devkim33
You clearly didn’t look at the laws that I linked you to though. California knife laws are not an issue for anyone. They are very reasonable.
Also, since you brought up the issue with homelessness, the crisis in California is a national issue, not a local California issue. Homeless folks from all over the country flock to California and to Florida and to other southern states. Homeless issues in those places are very much a national issue. I guarantee you there are former Vermonters in those places that are living there homeless. Actually, I know for a fact there are because I have done homeless outreach in these places.
The reason I’m assuming you’re a right-winger, is because you’re using all of their fear mongering talking points when you’re discussing these other places. It’s actually slightly embarrassing if you aren’t a right winger my dude. Please get out and visit some of these places. They aren’t nearly as bad as the angry man on TV makes them out to be.
DCLexiLou t1_j6oi05h wrote
Reply to comment by VTpowpatrol in Friend’s First Time Skiing by heretic_lez
Barbara Ann taught my wife and I in our 40's and she was an absolutely lovely person and wonderful teacher. Not to mention Olympic Gold medalist. Cochran's gets my vote for starting out.
IceStormMeadows t1_j6ohmsi wrote
GOP strategy. Possibly to normalize the idea of only certain people being able to vote. Total speculation. I have no idea.
Kurigana t1_j6oha4b wrote
Reply to comment by JodaUSA in Someone shot a bald eagle on Lake Rescue in Ludlow. by cookmybook
Nationalism? Are you stupid? That's how every fucking judicial system works in the world.
You want to give 30 years of prison to someone for killing a random beggar and, then, the same 30 years for killing the fucking President, who's way more important to the country socially and objectively. You want to give a guy 30 years of prison for killing a random kid and, then, the same 30 years of prison to a guy who killed a random kid while the kid was with a bazooka trying to explode his house. EVERY, I repeat, EVERY judicial system will take the context and social relevance of someone into account.
And is every living organism of the same importance? So go to jail, because you've killed probably three trillions of bacteries by now. Why wouldn't they be relevant? This is nationalism! Stop being nationalist! LMAO.
__j0sh__ OP t1_j6ogzjn wrote
Reply to comment by ARaoulVermonter in Fidium experience in Montpelier by __j0sh__
Ah good to know. I saw this https://www.fidiumfiber.com/fiber-internet-Montpelier-vt, maybe just a marketing thing though.
ARaoulVermonter t1_j6ogp5r wrote
Reply to comment by friendofmany in Fidium experience in Montpelier by __j0sh__
Fidium = Consolidated in the same way that XFINITY = Comcast. It's just a branding thing.
CUTESTlittleDEADHEAD t1_j6ogkrk wrote
Reply to comment by powderski84 in Really want to build a house like this. Passive home stays at 70 degrees in Maine w/o furnace. by Twigglesnix
Hi, I know horselifter very well, we live in the same house and have the same child. We used a LUNOS e2 HRV system. They work great, I like that they are not centralized, easy to maintain, easy to install.
Sea_Drama_5958 t1_j6og7ly wrote
Reply to My proposal for near-future inter-town/city passenger rail expansions in Vermont! (MAP) by DrToadley
This would cost an incredible amount of money to serve a small population. Not a good use of tax dollars for a state that isn’t exactly swimming in revenue
Sea_Drama_5958 t1_j6oftom wrote
Reply to comment by Borsaid in Friend’s First Time Skiing by heretic_lez
Lol do you need help tying your own shoes too? Anyone can teach skiiing
friendofmany t1_j6ofmcp wrote
Reply to Fidium experience in Montpelier by __j0sh__
Not sure Fidium is in Montpelier, but I know Consolidated Communications offers fiber. I only know a couple of people using it and it seems fine. Comcast offers similar speeds over cable too I think.
deadowl t1_j6ofdbx wrote
Reply to comment by thisoneisnotasbad in Did a crime occur or was someone just overwhelmed? by RamaSchneider
I was thinking along the lines of the money going to the boyfriend meaning there wasn't enough money to pay the actual care givers. Comes off like a miniature Ponzi scheme if you were to think of it that way.
Aol_awaymessage t1_j6ofct2 wrote
Reply to comment by GrilledSpamSteaks in Really want to build a house like this. Passive home stays at 70 degrees in Maine w/o furnace. by Twigglesnix
Rockwool?
DrToadley OP t1_j6oe8nh wrote
Reply to comment by Corey307 in My proposal for near-future inter-town/city passenger rail expansions in Vermont! (MAP) by DrToadley
Whoa there. My advocacy for scary things like bike lanes and improved bus service does not imply turning Vermont into Amsterdam overnight and forcing everyone to throw their cars out. I just think that providing people with more options, including a modestly improved rail system that doesn't only go to Burlington from New York City, some more bike lanes in town centers, and better-advertised buses would be worth looking into.
HeadPen5724 t1_j6oe8ka wrote
I don’t even know what this is trying to say?? It also looks like it’s completely made up.
Sea-Election-9168 t1_j6ob8fe wrote
Marco’s in South Burlington, across the parking lot from Price Chopper right there on Williston Road. Thin crust with full-fat mozzarella. Bacon and red onion. Sauce on the side. Fuck the haters.
Sea-Election-9168 t1_j6oa3pc wrote
Reply to comment by noelesque in Pizza post: Is "Vermont Style" a thing or just buzzy internet food-speak? by noelesque
I like Cosetta’s and Red’s Savoy both!!!!
HardTacoKit t1_j6o8m7a wrote
Reply to comment by maddkid53 in Dumpling spots? by Tothestreets90
When are they open?
HeadPen5724 t1_j6o8m4r wrote
Reply to comment by KITTYONFYRE in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
Quick question, when you quote do you have to retype the entire damn text? I can’t copy and paste, it’s just collapses your comment? Or am I missing something???
HeadPen5724 t1_j6o8e01 wrote
Reply to comment by KITTYONFYRE in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
At least if voters started grouping people it would mean they actually learned about the candidates and didn’t just look for the letter next to their name, that would be an improvement, but I doubt that would actually happen realistically.
We don’t have FPTP voting, so I’m not sure the relevance of that. You can’t win with a plurality (see Shumlin v Milne 2014) or any traditional runoff really.
In VT IRV would actually likely lead to 1 party rule. The GOP would stop being a viable party. Progressives would pick up some of the democrats, but democrats would pick up almost all of the independents/centrists AND conservative voters who no longer have a viable candidate. One party rule is even worse than 2.
It really doesn’t save enough money to warrant a change, mail out balloting negates the “saves time” benefit, and it won’t disrupt the 2 party system (which isn’t really the problem, rather the party system as whole is).
I’ll finish here with my original comment, IRV is a solution looking for a problem.
I appreciate the conversation though and I’m glad we continued it through. I’ve given IRV more thought that I otherwise would have and that’s a positive. I’ll look forward to more dialogues in the future. Thanks.
blipblapblorp t1_j6o7r34 wrote
Reply to My proposal for near-future inter-town/city passenger rail expansions in Vermont! (MAP) by DrToadley
I lived in Randolph for a year and would have stayed much longer if I could have reliably commuted to WRJ via train. It's such a nice little town.
reidfleming2k20 t1_j6ole30 wrote
Reply to Pizza post: Is "Vermont Style" a thing or just buzzy internet food-speak? by noelesque
IMHO it would only be a "thing" if people outside of Vermont knew what it was. So, no. Same with "creemees."