Recent comments in /f/vermont

ojhatsman t1_j6pal6x wrote

Exactly, like if you’re interested in stone house architecture go to a museum or something. Vermonters also are becoming more militant towards leaf peeper types because they’re sick and tired of being disregarded and disrespectful by the people wanting nothing but pictures of their homes and yards.

1

wut_the_phuck t1_j6p8cvb wrote

I’m close to Bennington on the southern end of the state so I can’t comment on Fidium in your area, but I have had Fidium for close to 4mo and I love them.

Been through 2 storms that knocked out power. As the power returned I had internet.

I’m on the lowest tear plan at $35 and I got 2 Wi-Fi routers with it. I use streaming services for tv and have a ton of smart plugs and cameras and I haven’t noticed anything buffering or working slow.

2

recyclopath_ t1_j6p6pnk wrote

Something to consider here is the difference between a predictable expense and a variable expense. That 10% is rolled into the mortgage over decades and is a stable, predictable expense that results in an incredibly comfortable home (I cannot overstate how comfortable efficiency homes are). Versus the variability of annual energy expenses over time.

Really what needs to happen is factoring in energy efficiency into home value.

0

recyclopath_ t1_j6p5u4k wrote

The US has a Passive House standard, the above commenter used the German spelling, that is much better aligned with US climate zones. Getting your home Passive House Certified is likely a bit over rated, like many certifications unless they open up funding.

You can absolutely build a Passive House without getting it certified which is totally worth is.

That being said, there are freaking excellent green building experts in Vermont with loads of experience who can guide you on what approach is right for you.

1

HeadPen5724 t1_j6p4sgo wrote

Less popular parties will get more total votes, that doesn’t mean they will get more candidates elected. The flaw in your view, is that you are assuming the VTGOP remains a viable party. It won’t, it barely is now. AND, by definition an independent voter sometimes votes right, sometimes votes left… they aren’t beholden to either party. So they are fairly centered. They aren’t all of a sudden going to leap frog the more moderate party to support the more extreme party? If you have Trump, Biden, and Sanders as candidates, and you remove Trump because the Republican Party is no longer relevant, who do you think those right leaning independents and conservatives are going to vote for? Sanders or Biden? The left leaning independents were mostly already voting for Biden anyways. It has nothing to do with popularity, it has to do with where on the political spectrum the party is compared with where the voters are.

You can rank away all you want, but the shift in votes has to come from somewhere and we are already almost at 1 party rule as is. This will exacerbate it. Republicans already can’t even override a veto?

0

KITTYONFYRE t1_j6p3p2g wrote

> based on their skin color

people in the 1790s also said "its the experiences I've had with these people that drive my hate for them, it's not their skin color!!!"

that's what modern day racists say too...

it's a terrible analogy, to be honest. it's not really analogous at all, except for the fact that one person's lived experiences are a terrible way to give basis to an entire town (ie, "I got robbed in Brandon! Brandon sucks and is high crime!" well no, you just had one bad experience there...).

your "experiences" were already colored by hate for the town from the beginning.

people hate rutland for the same reason people hate nickelback. it's the thing to do.

1