Recent comments in /f/vermont

fredej3 t1_j72kmw0 wrote

Daikin, installed in 2018. It's rated down to 5F, but I switch to propane at 15F. Ran them most of the time this winter, until this weekend. Worst electric bill was $150 higher than not running them. Keeps the house at 68F-70F no problem.

4

Necessary-Bee-8691 t1_j72k4n0 wrote

There's a program in Vermont called VHIP (Vermont Housing Improvement Program) that provides up to $50k in grant money. This can be used to retrofit a barn to create an ADU. There is a requirement that the unit be rented at a fair housing market rate for 5 years. In my opinion, that's a win/win, as it provides funds to create more affordable housing.

2

GrilledSpamSteaks t1_j72i1lz wrote

Heat pump work regardless of the outside temp. When the temp gets below the rating, it doesn’t stop working, it just becomes more expensive than other electric heaters to operate. Would you need a backup heat source? No more than you’d need a backup water heater. Would it be cheaper to have a wood stove with heat pumps as a secondary system? It has been so far for us.

2

reefer_roulette t1_j72h53q wrote

I worked in a barn that was half cows, half horses. The cow side was always warm and the horse side was almost always frozen. The heat the cows put out is impressive.

14

wtn_dropsith t1_j72f1n3 wrote

I don't get why you're being downvoted. Politicians should be held accountable for their tax-funded actions in their official capacity. If any lawmaker proposed a bill which was made law, and then found to be unconstitutional, they should be subject to legal penalty for violating the rights of the people they are charged with governing. Why is that a controversial though for some? We encourage further violations of rights by not having such rules in place.

I don't think it's qualified immunity, though, for policy makers it is usually referred to as legislative immunity.

1

Unique-Public-8594 t1_j72d5se wrote

Doing great. Comfy warm. Same as any other day. We got Bosch with aux heat coil installed 11/22. Heat pump functions to -4 then the coil provides heat below that. We chose it for the high praise for how well it does at low temps due to the aux heat coil. $20k included install and electric upgrade at pole. Loan pmt = $300/mo. Dec elec bill = $300. Thermostat set to 70.

1400sf leaky not zoned 1868 home with some insulation but not amazing insulation, huge leaky windows (former one-room school house). Windows currently frosted up all the way to the top which we rarely see. Bedrooms have no doors. Upstairs and downstairs open air flow. Near Stowe. None of our pipes go up external walls.

Very pleased so far. Will know more after next 2 month’s elec bill.

We happen to be Ideally located/positioned for solar if need be.

Our oil furnace broke/disintegrated. We have no back-up other than a space heater (which we haven’t felt any need to use). Space heater has auto temp setting and will shut off if it falls down.

Public Service Announcement: just learned this year that space heaters need to be plugged into walls (not plugged into extension cords).

Update:

  1. still cozy warm inside 70 degrees 8p. -18 outside.

  2. Saturday. 7:30a still cozy 72 inside. -19 outside.

22

8valvegrowl t1_j72c0p4 wrote

I don't really use my heat pumps in the winter for anything but air circulation in my new house. Just my woodstove from Nov to April.

But in the past I've had no issue running my Mitsubishi or others (Fujitsu and LG) down to -10F or -15F, they just heat cycle a lot and use a lot of power, without creating a ton of heat...but no issues beyond that.

11

headgasketidiot t1_j72aomb wrote

It's interesting that in recognizing the very real resource constraints, the first place you think to look to tighten the belt is how many of the homeless are from another state.

These sketchy motels are just privatizing public housing. They provide unstable, incredibly low quality housing, and they're really expensive. Why do we allow for-profit motels that are otherwise nonviable businesses to survive by siphoning money from state coffers intended to house those in need? It's so wildly inefficient, and yet for some reason we accept it as - I don't even know what to put here - the best we can do? The "proper" role of government?

Let's have proper public housing. Instead of leaving our neighbors down on their luck in gross motels on and off without kitchens or reliable sources of transportation, let's give them a real chance to get back on their feet, and save money while doing it.

14