Recent comments in /f/vermont
memorytheatre t1_j9s3y3a wrote
Reply to Senate panel advances major housing bill, overhauling municipal zoning and Act 250 by DaddyBobMN
One big difference between New Jersey and Vermont. New Jersey is across a river from the most dominant economic city in America, perhaps the world. Vermont is across a lake from the Adirondacks.
How many people do you think want to move to a place with very few good, well-paying, career-worthy jobs? Where winter is 6-7 months of the year? Unless you think there will be a mad rush to get at those crappy seasonal service jobs, I wouldn't freak out too much about it.
Rich people FROM New Jersey, NY, Mass, Conn. buying up houses to use as second homes in Vermont. Now that is something to freak out a little about.
ConquestOfPizzaTime t1_j9s2nrd wrote
Reply to Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
egg your landlord's house
statuek t1_j9s21c9 wrote
Reply to comment by dropkickninja in School administrators in the NEK are literally trying to kill our kids! by lantonas
Very cool.
corpolorax t1_j9s16mr wrote
Reply to Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
You could make the argument that to the extent the lease allows the landlord to force expression on you, the lease is unconscionable or against public policy (especially without allowing you to put your own political signage out there).
(Not legal advice)
bonanzapineapple t1_j9s0t4s wrote
Reply to comment by anniedee82 in School administrators in the NEK are literally trying to kill our kids! by lantonas
Right? In St J it was like 5"
Jerry_Williams69 t1_j9s0mvb wrote
Reply to comment by anom_k in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Phalluses are often a simple, but elegant option for protesting
rick-feynman t1_j9s0kel wrote
Reply to Some of the Mountains of VT by elseh2o
Stark Mountain > *
[deleted] t1_j9rzuh2 wrote
Reply to Some of the Mountains of VT by elseh2o
[removed]
vermont4runner t1_j9rx1jb wrote
Reply to comment by anom_k in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Nothing like a criminal record to show them!
vermont4runner t1_j9rx0b6 wrote
Reply to comment by AlarmingTap6953 in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
So the answer is no.
anom_k t1_j9ruolf wrote
Reply to comment by Jerry_Williams69 in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Well, phalluses have solved every problem I've ever encountered.
AnyRound5042 t1_j9rufqh wrote
Reply to Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
yeah you can go outside at night and walk around the corner and put on a mask and a hoodie and then go back and fucking throw the sign away. have you tried emailing the landlord and saying something like you dont appreciate having political signage in front of your building because it looks like its YOUR sign?
Jc01108 t1_j9rtcar wrote
Reply to Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
You lease space in the building and don’t own the property the building sits on. The owner is entitled to put a sign on his own property unless the lease says otherwise.
Jerry_Williams69 t1_j9rt9l1 wrote
Reply to comment by anom_k in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Did you know a phallus drawn on a standard white poster board with a thick Sharpie can be seen clearly from 100 yards away? Do what you will with that knowledge.
v3rmin_supreme t1_j9rszof wrote
Reply to Post hole depth? by CancelCultAntifaLol
just a nice post about setting posts nicely.
anom_k t1_j9rsfy4 wrote
Reply to comment by bitspace in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Yup
AlarmingTap6953 t1_j9rs7u8 wrote
Reply to comment by Unique-Public-8594 in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Our leases do not mention sign, for or against.
joeconn4 t1_j9rs5eb wrote
Reply to comment by mountainofclay in Burlington, Vermont - May 1980 by gammapsi05
B&J barely existed. Started in 1978. Still on College/St Paul at this point.
Practical-Intern-347 t1_j9rrwav wrote
Reply to comment by bitspace in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Put another sign directly in front of it.
bitspace t1_j9rrkka wrote
Reply to comment by anom_k in Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
This is probably illegal.
anom_k t1_j9rrbg5 wrote
Reply to Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Destroy it
Unique-Public-8594 t1_j9rqvfn wrote
Reply to Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
It depends on what your lease says. Does your lease prohibit your landlord from putting up political signs on the property?
rosamota t1_j9rnq7j wrote
Reply to Hi Guys, by Plus-Frosting6472
Try battery street jeans in Burlington…on college street.
CorrectFall6257 OP t1_j9rmzox wrote
Reply to comment by joycethegod in Gray jay watching the turkeys & deer by CorrectFall6257
Yes I live near Mollies Bog and Moose Bog. I take my Mom a lot to feed the birds.
Willie_the_Wombat t1_j9s48fg wrote
Reply to Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
I would imagine that depends on the terms of your lease. Does your lease specify that you have occupancy of the entire property, including outdoor spaces? You might make a case if you have responsibilities for upkeep of the properties exterior (lawn care, snow removal, etc…), that signage is under that jurisdiction, but that’s probably still a pretty big stretch. At the end of the day, the owner of the property is going to have the ultimate jurisdiction over what is or isn’t permissible. My advice, and keep in mind this is not legal advice, I’m not a legal practitioner, is to not start a fight with the properties owner. My understanding is that at the conclusion of your current lease, the owner can decline to renew/discontinue/ terminate (not sure of the actual legal term) your lease “without cause”, meaning they would not need any reason other than “I don’t want to” to not renew your lease.