Recent comments in /f/vermont

Real-Pierre-Delecto2 t1_jacvv1t wrote

The entire idea of "not propping up" places like SJA and LI are insane as most of Kixeliz's rants are she even brought your kid into it!. Actually kinda thankful she blocked me. What's the alternative then? Let SJA and LI die and spend untold millions building new high schools in the area. Not gonna happen. Where will they build them will my kids now have to spend three hours or more on the bus everyday. It's already almost 2 hrs now. Blinded by hatred seems to be a common theme these days.

4

Dangerous_Mention_15 t1_jacvp65 wrote

It's really bad.

The area hospitals have the physical capacity to take care of patients (beds, equipment) but inadequate staffing and are unable to hire sufficient full-time staff (physicians, nurses, etc.). The common problem is lack of housing that is affordable with respect to the relevant salaries.

Many hospitals are rationing who they accept in transfer (and likely skirting EMTLA requirements) and patients are frequently boarding in hospitals where they are at or exceeding the level of care at that hospital can provide. Prior to Covid, these patients would generally be transferred in a timely manner. At this stage, many patients are receiving somewhat sub optimal care at they aren't be transferred to larger hospitals to have the appropriate specialists to take care of their condition.

To give an example, let's say you have a full-time RN position paying $80,000 per year, this will allow that individual to purchase a house at 3X-4X gross income -> $240,000-$320,000. Understandably, it is exceedingly difficult to find a house within a reasonable commute and in a decent community from the UVM medical center. As such, there are over 490 open nursing positions at UVM medical center. People go where they are wanted, and these nurses are largely taking jobs in other communities where they can have a more viable lifestyle.

Additionally, the green mountain care board provides another regulatory layer with increased overhead expenses and the UVM Medical Center has a near monopoly of care for much of Vermont. As such, Vermont has the fifth highest health costs per capita in the country (despite being relatively healthy otherwise) and difficulty in accessing health care. For instance, obtaining an MRI brain in the Burlington area via UVM Medical Center will cost 4X – 5X the cost of an MRI brain and an imaging center in the neighboring state.

5

suzi-r t1_jacve6e wrote

Plain, unused, or slightly used kitty litter works great. One big ($5-7) bag can last thru several snowfalls. I use it with satisfaction. Try it before you scoff me out

1

No-Ganache7168 t1_jacv46n wrote

I send my child to private school for middle school only due to bullying, racism and a poor curriculum. I don’t expect taxpayers to pay for it. But I disagree public schools need more money to provide a better education. Pretty much all private schools spend less per student than public ones. My child has all academic courses along with art, music and PE. The local public middle school required students to take non-academic courses to fill holes in their schedule and the math and science curriculum are years behind. Plus there’s a no homework policy and no letter grades. The per-pupil cost is twice as much as my child’s tuition. And bullying is ignored even when committee based on race, gender or sexual preference.

The local high school has a great curriculum based on what each student wants to do after graduating and bullying and racism are addressed promptly and efficiently. It will be a great financial relief to benefit from the schools I support with my tax dollars.

9

Desperate_Ring_8933 t1_jacv21m wrote

I would drove around stowe on the weekend end until I found it the use a nail not key nail will get right to right bare steel then cause rust we don't need these rich limp dick ass holes here O and make sure to write welcome to vt

7

Ok_Birthday749 t1_jacurhj wrote

Yes and it will be a travesty if they don’t make some changes to these bills as proposed. The underlying problems with our education system are not going to be solved any time soon and gutting the schools that provide the best education in the state for the most at risk students is not going to help.

2

Ok_Birthday749 t1_jacuc2y wrote

The problem is nobody wants to pay more in taxes. Using property taxes to fund education is part of how we ended up in this mess to begin with. Do you really think a Republican Governor, even a moderate one like Phil Scott is going to allow for an income tax increase to fund public education? We are in a real pickle that can only be solved by a complete overhaul, like so many other social issues in our country.

9

Ok_Birthday749 t1_jacsjnf wrote

No I’m arguing the issue at hand. The topic of what to do about the shitty schools we have all over the place here in VT wasn’t the topic. There are plenty of things that could be done and should be done to make schools here better. We can never get to any sort of real change because we get hung up on issues like this one.

ETA: you really have no ability to use logic do you lol? This is about education dipshit. We live in a capitalist country. Everything is under the guise of capitalism.

4

Kixeliz t1_jacruip wrote

It's always weird to me when people wag their finger about rushing to judgement and then freely make their own assumptions.

The public education system is in shambles, specifically because pro-business people have been actively working to undermine public education for decades, including propping up schools like SJA and LI. It's also weird how you say this isn't a black and white issue, yet you're only arguing for private schools here. And for the record, I don't give a shit what religion you may or may not hold, that part is absolutely a distraction. It's about capitalism, not who you pray to. "Avowed socialist," man people really say whatever on the internet, huh?

Edit: This is a great example of people's priorities shifting because they personally see a benefit. You stated you have a kid going to SJA, so now you're strongly defending a private school despite claiming to be an "avowed socialist." So either that was a lie, or your politics take a back seat if you think something is going your way.

2

landodk t1_jacradl wrote

I think it’s better to have a maximum per student rate and then standards that receiving schools should be held to. This crap with MVC is ridiculous, but Burr and Burton has never had those issues.

Obviously Manchester made the choice to go that way, but look at a town like Ludlow or Grafton. If their local tax base does not support a full high school, they get grouped into another district, but there are 3 high schools close and depending on where in the town you live changes drive time significantly.

Certainly there is an argument for increased taxes in general, but especially in south central VT there isn’t the population density to support local schools.

In fact with the need for alternative schools in general, I think we should be supporting this, but again, with high standards.

7

Kixeliz t1_jacr1x0 wrote

Isn't it weird how when it comes to things like broadband, the state is working to bring that service to underserved areas, but with schools its "well, there's no public school here so we have no choice but to use the private school available"? It stops being weird when you realize for decades now, the pro-business folks have been trying to undermine public education and prop up private schools. They get elected to the school board and purposely underfund the budget (looking at you Barre). Then they cry foul when there is any attempt to get funds back into public schools. They get to undermine public education then point to how ineffective public education is and how private schools are better. All part of the Republican play book where they actively make government worse so they can then tout the benefits of small government.

21