Recent comments in /f/vermont

DaddyBobMN t1_jcpdzzg wrote

I was watching a documentary about a town with a strong rail history and one of the engineers said that any of them that had made life careers of the job (he was talking postwar to the 80s) had hit and killed someone at some point, whether on foot or in their vehicles. I can't imagine me and all so many of my coworkers having to live with that.

10

WhatTheCluck802 t1_jcp9iq8 wrote

This makes me so angry, the selfishness of that action is beyond the pale. How can someone be so self absorbed to not care about the horrible impacts to that train engineer. It is inexcusable to have someone else kill you like this woman did - she’s dead but that poor engineer will live with this horrible memory for the rest of his life. Infuriating. There are a million other methods that, while devastating to family and traumatic to first responders to deal with a body dead by suicide, will not actively engage another person in taking your life. This is truly an evil action on her part.

54

clickmahheels t1_jcp49z8 wrote

I watched the first meeting.

Some salient points:

The center in question has been operating at a deficit for years. The tuition raise is to bring them into the black and also raise quality to match that of the other local centers owned by the same company.

There was a lot of talk about how difficult staffing is. Raises for staff have varied from 15-28% and represent a significant increase in cost of care over the last few years.

Parents accused the company of lying about their losses, because they wouldn't share the specific numbers. (I'm not sure what business makes their specific financials public knowledge, so I'm not sure where parents got the expectation that it was reasonable to request that)

Parents requested that the center not improve quality of care. Expressed that they didn't think routine building/facility maintenance was necessary.

Parents are upset that more training days for staff means they are moving to a care schedule more in line with the public schools.

1

funky_ass_flea_bass t1_jcp3oei wrote

‘“And the sacramental seal of confession is the worldwide law of the Catholic Church, not just the diocese of Burlington, Vermont,” Coyne said, according to the Associated Press. He added that the bill “crosses a Constitutional protective element of our religious faith: the right to worship as we see fit.’”

Let’s be clear here folks. The Catholic Diocese of Burlington (and really the Catholic Church as a whole) thinks that the right to a confidential confession is more important than the rights of children who have been abused by them. Even though in any context outside of religion (I.e. a therapy session), you would be required to report suspected child abuse. Cultures of silence are dangerous.

11

Human802 t1_jcp01xu wrote

““And the sacramental seal of confession is the worldwide law of the Catholic Church, not just the diocese of Burlington, Vermont,” Coyne said, according to the Associated Press. He added that the bill “crosses a Constitutional protective element of our religious faith: the right to worship as we see fit.”

The Church position is clear, requiring them to report any information about child abuse infringes on the Catholic ability to worship.

Just imagine if the Church of Scientology asked for an exemption to the mandatory reporting requirement.

26

clickmahheels t1_jcoxjtm wrote

In this case, the center is trying to improve quality and parents are upset about the cost.

It’s a catch-22. Everyone wants quality care, but no one wants to pay for it. As a corporate center, they are either going to be lambasted for not being high enough quality or accused of being greedy for charging what it costs to provide quality.

0

heartbeatsleft t1_jcosjpe wrote

Has that stopped the rightwing from pushing their agenda through legislatures, knowing it’ll be challenged or rejected? Then they simply try again and again, improving their craft each time until it’s finally the new law. They did it with abortion in numerous states until it was federally overturned. They found a way to have bounty hunter laws for abortions be accepted by the courts. Has that literally ever stopped them from challenging existing laws? So why should it stop us?

Maybe let Texas be an example and implement bounty Hunter laws against clergy sex abuse.

6