Recent comments in /f/vermont

you_give_me_coupon t1_jdd6sk3 wrote

Daily reminder that even the worst-case right-wing estimates are that Medicare for All would save $300 billion a year - in addition to preventing shitshows like this. The reason we have horrific billing processes like this instead of universal healthcare is not because the latter would cost more.

12

VTMomof2 t1_jdd6quo wrote

I'll be going thru this soon too. My husband died and owes UVM for his final ER visit. Luckily its only a few grand, but they can pound sand because all he has in his estate is a couple used cars and a 25+ year old boat and he has alot more debt than assets. I'm still waiting for the probate court the accept my e-filing.

6

Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_jdd1by6 wrote

Something is off. Home prices are increasing at rates never seen before and I've never seen a viable explanation other than people moving here during the pandemic.

https://vtdigger.org/2023/02/16/a-vermont-perfect-storm-statewide-data-shows-record-spike-in-housing-prices/

What other explanation is there for the largest increase since records starting being kept?

0

Dukaso t1_jdd046m wrote

So here's the thing - the way the post is titled makes it sound like increasing statehouse wages is a bad thing. I googled you and see that you've run for legislature before, and I also noticed in one of your comments that you agree this is a good thing.

Ironically, I think a lot of the people who are shitting on you would actually agree with you, but are thrown off by the post title. Notice how the replies supporting increased wages are being upvoted (including yours!), but the actual post is at 0 votes? There's a clear disconnect. Given your opinion on the subject, a more appropriate title may have been "Progress towards livable wages for VT lawmakers".

I have an honest question for you - do you think that the average person knows what a VT lawmaker is paid? I'd wager they don't, and when a person hears that VT lawmakers are going to double their salary, their gut reaction is going to be negative.

PS: I know that you didn't editorialize the title of this post, but do you really think people are going to even open the seven days article? They're coming here for the comments.

3

getthetime t1_jdcwon2 wrote

Also worth noting that unless the OP's name is attached to the estate then not paying the bill will not affect his/her credit score, and UVM med can go suck a dick.

It's always good to keep in mind that any time a creditor threatens you, there is still only so much they can do. So unless they can come after you personally, I say let them send the notices and beg all they want. By the end the calendar year it becomes nothing more than a loss/write-off for them anyway.

51

you_give_me_coupon t1_jdcw9n5 wrote

> Dude right now it's an ugly 1950s one story building that's the most out of place building in downtown and has a negative impact on the overall feeling of enclosure and sense of place.

Yes, the existing building is very bad. That doesn't mean it should be replaced with something differently hideous. Why set the bar so low?

> One modern building in the entire town is not a bad thing.

There are already quite a few monstrosities: the library, the people's bank building, the coop. I fear this building will add one more bleak, unadorned 5-over-1 turd made out of petroleum glues to the list.

6

one-zero t1_jdcw0mh wrote

All I’m going to say is don’t pay anything at all unless it’s been through probate and assets have been itemized on paper. I have a friend who pays $1 a month for a spleen removal. I have one who got a $32,000 dollar bill for a helicopter ride and had full coverage blue cross/blue shield. You’ll get bills for more than a year but unless he/she had money or assets it’ll eventually get covered. Anything that’s of any value put it in an escrow account.

81

captainogbleedmore t1_jdcugkc wrote

Not sure if you are referring to the museum or the massage parlor, but this is the artist rendering of what the area where the bistro currently stands would look like after demolition and building.

Edit: Full gallery with all mockups avail here

https://preview.redd.it/dvc0hn79gjpa1.jpeg?width=2769&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=cb53fe062fd66b6abcd9cada73a1e3804f7a2c20

2

Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_jdcrlaa wrote

I think the op is talking about the need to attract a workforce, which is true. Hiring is impossible here unless you want to teach a 60 year old how to turn on a computer. The problem is its hard to convince people to come here for jobs when the jobs won't cover the cost of housing.

−1

headgasketidiot t1_jdcom1y wrote

There is no influx of out of staters moving here. You can trivially debunk this by looking at Vermont's population in the census. From July 2021 to July 2022, Vermont's population increased by less than 100 people. A few thousand moved here one year, and everyone freaked out about it, and continues to freak out about it, despite it being less than 1% of the total population. Since then, it has returned to flatline.

3