Recent comments in /f/vermont

cpujockey t1_je5ccm8 wrote

> better than what the average person could make at home.

lies. at home you can choose your own beans, master the way of frothing your milk. You can make a much better product at home with even a cheap machine. Do not discount the DIY way. It's like bread, you can buy it in a store, or make it at home, guess which one tastes better and gives you more control over what goes in it..?

0

Rogers_Ebert t1_je5c7lo wrote

We need people to work and provide servies to the community. We need families to continue providing a tax base to continue as a community. Communities are made up of people and we get more people by reproducing, we need to incentivize this.

It is also a tax break from previous liabilities the family already had, they aren't getting money from the State just keeping more of what they already earned, not the State.

1

Kvltadelic t1_je5bt3c wrote

Don’t threaten me with a good time, let’s march hand in hand into extinction!

I was mostly joking but I seriously think it’s ridiculous that people get massive tax breaks for reproducing. I’m paying into a system without creating more dependents to pull money out via schools and healthcare.

There should be a tax break for mitigating overpopulation and not forcing anyone to look at dumb pictures of my offspring.

2

Rogers_Ebert t1_je59cwn wrote

Its called State law Rama, you should know especially if you want to represent us in the State government. As a legal gun owner in Vermont, if I travel across State lines with my gun doesn't mean the laws are the same.

Its not really that complicated, though I realize your argument isn't in good faith.

−4

Rogers_Ebert t1_je577lf wrote

Humans have been having babies and raising families before the advent of the written and spoken word. There are people that lived in huts made of sod that bore children.

The main issue here is that this is a tax credit meaning it's absolving the parents of an already owed tax liability. Depending on your feelings of the State and government, taxes I'm Vermo t are already too high for their return.

2

GraniteGeekNH t1_je51rsl wrote

Excellent point and you are correct, it does not appear to be illegal. I did the common but flawed online thing of repeating something I had heard as if it was established fact. Shame on me!

Looking at NH Dept. of Agriculture rules I can find nothing that says it is illegal to move, only that it is a really bad idea.

1

FyuckerFjord t1_je519f4 wrote

No, fuck that. Cops use their union to literally get away with murder while keeping their jobs and pensions.

And fuck you for trying to compare that to slavery and racism. There's no such thing as a blue life - you can take the shirt off. Black people can't take their skin color off, and cops are shooting them because of it and using unions to get away with it.

Wow. The lion the witch and the audacity of this bitch to try to compare indoor and outdoor slaves to being against how police unions sanction murder.

−1

ejjsjejsj t1_je4xy5i wrote

My point is you guys are irrational. Commercial development is ugly so you don't want that, you hate tourists and don't want people to rent out spaces to them to make money, and you don't want remote workers living here(and paying tax). Yet you also complain there are no good jobs to keep young people in the state and that housing is too expensive. You just want everything to stay the same but magical fairy dust to create good paying jobs and affordable housing, which is not going to happen

1

Human802 t1_je4xe65 wrote

Like it or not their is no constitutional right to have cannabis.

For at least 12 years now the Supreme Court’s decision says citizens have the right to a fire arm for self defense. While can say I am not a fan of that ruling, I also know any attempts at “gun control” will be limited to that ruling.

−10