Recent comments in /f/videos
Voidcroft t1_j5mssy6 wrote
Reply to comment by hawt_pawket in holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
Voidcroft t1_j5msr2t wrote
Reply to holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
Seriously? You just stole the original 9 min vid from Vice and made it into a shitty short to beg for subs in Reddit? Come on man..
MSGRiley t1_j5msmqy wrote
Reply to comment by lancc33 in holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
It did not. I commented that this is bad, yes, but the military is aware of these things usually far before it gets to us on social media and even if they weren't, you couldn't simply walk on base, grab a nuke and use it.
There are a lot of safety features on even just regular missiles that would make them unlikely to be useful if stolen, nukes are way worse. I mean, it's concerning and yeah, probably everyone involved is in huge trouble but honestly, not a good chance that this intel would be actionable.
More like other countries looking at it and laughing. "Dumbasses. I'm glad the idiots in our army will get a break from being laughed at for a minute."
Voidcroft t1_j5mscwq wrote
Reply to comment by lancc33 in holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
How about start with the content, stop stealing other peoples stuff and butchering it to peddle as your own?
lancc33 OP t1_j5mrpc0 wrote
Reply to comment by MSGRiley in holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
Well? Did it leave you speechless?😃😅
MSGRiley t1_j5mr3y9 wrote
Reply to holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
My thoughts are that I just saw this a few hours ago.
lancc33 OP t1_j5mqkl1 wrote
Reply to comment by R4TTY in holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
Any help/tip?
R4TTY t1_j5mqii6 wrote
Reply to holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
You need to work on your titles, no one will click this.
[deleted] t1_j5mq8g1 wrote
Reply to comment by hawt_pawket in holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
[deleted]
hawt_pawket t1_j5mpzex wrote
Reply to holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
Sounds interesting. Have a link to more information?
PrinceJamRoll t1_j5hy0wk wrote
Reply to comment by nickram81 in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
What does that mean?
username161013 t1_j5dc47e wrote
If you liked that, check this out... https://youtu.be/VkUq4sO4LQM
-_alfox_- OP t1_j5c18cd wrote
Reply to comment by rengeek in WOW IMAGINE A SKRILLEX CONCERT WITH THOSE ROBOTS xD by -_alfox_-
Yeah after I saw the short i searched it, is awesome! Hahahahaha thx
rengeek t1_j5bxc9o wrote
Original video ad https://youtu.be/bAdqazixuRY
-_alfox_- OP t1_j5b5btx wrote
Reply to comment by randaloo1973 in WOW IMAGINE A SKRILLEX CONCERT WITH THOSE ROBOTS xD by -_alfox_-
Hahahahahaha that was sickkkk ! Kinda creepy but cool xD
randaloo1973 t1_j5b22j1 wrote
Check out captured by robots
Auserna t1_j5avuwt wrote
Lots of keyboard mashing, finally a robot that can pass the "I'm not a robot test"
Sololololololol t1_j56befv wrote
Reply to comment by theBizz1138 in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
Are you mentally unwell?
Sololololololol t1_j56bd23 wrote
Reply to comment by theBizz1138 in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
Yeah you're too remedial for this conversation.
theBizz1138 t1_j563h02 wrote
Reply to comment by Sololololololol in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
People don’t like me because they found out I’m a pervert is a hell of a lot different than ostracizing someone for burnt toast… this is why you’re SO steps out on you
theBizz1138 t1_j562tc0 wrote
Reply to comment by Sololololololol in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
I asked you to show me in your feed. You said you seem this stuff all the time… I didn’t believe you. You asked me to specifically google it… how the fuck is googling an image the same as it popping up with out searching in your feed
The things you look at on Reddit are why you see nut sack cakes so much…. What are you looking at?
Again, saying something is cringy does not in anyway explain why other than you said so.
Sololololololol t1_j560v1l wrote
Reply to comment by theBizz1138 in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
Idk what you’re on about, I said to go google image search it cuz you kept insisting.
You honestly are a moron. “Heh give me proof of this happening”
“Okay, here”
“Yeah well, that’s only because you’re specifically searching for it”
“???”
Yeah you ain’t worth the brain cells lost talking to you
And yes, I explained why I find it cringe and if you’re too dull to know how to read that’s on you, you’re literally the only person in this thread who’s this remedial.
theBizz1138 t1_j55g6ir wrote
Reply to comment by Sololololololol in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
So those links don’t say anything about google. I can see you left comments if I look at your history but when you click on them they don’t exist. Are you sure you didn’t edit or delete them? Saying something is cringe isn’t explaining why.
So be you specifically look for an image now your mad you see it? Just because it’s in the google search your searched for doesn’t mean it’s plaguing Reddit.
Sololololololol t1_j54cv01 wrote
Reply to comment by theBizz1138 in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
lancc33 OP t1_j5msvlj wrote
Reply to comment by Voidcroft in holy cow, any thoughts about this? by lancc33
I didn’t steal, I made a shorts with subtitles which is allowed under YouTube guidelines. What is your problem?