Recent comments in /f/worldnews

Ramboxious t1_j6mqoi6 wrote

Brazil's imports from Russia grew by 89% in the 3 months from the start of the war. So I guess not increasing the imports would be ideal? But I understand importing fertilizer, I don't think that would need to be part of the sanctions.

> just to please some other country's foreign policy? No, thanks.

What foreign policy are you talking about? The 'stop countries from annexing other countries' policy?

3

calangodragon t1_j6mqlvi wrote

"West doesn't want this war"

This is actually so ironic. I can assure you that NATO couldn't be happier with this war on Ukraine.

Also, learn a little about Brazil and eventually you will find out that my country's position in ALL WARS (the exception being against nazi-germany) is NON-INTERVENTION. This is not only cultural tradition but is actualy WRITTEN in our constitution. Literally nothing shocking here.

0

frostygrin t1_j6mq2e6 wrote

So what would have been the way to a lasting peace in Afghanistan - for Russia to arm the Taliban when the US was there? :)

More importantly, you can't act like the invasion is the only obstacle to a lasting peace in Ukraine. How about the majority ethnic Russian Crimea on one hand, and Ukraine aiming to be an ethnostate, suppressing other languages and cultures? What if many Crimeans don't want to be part of Ukraine?

0

snakesnake9 t1_j6mpyqz wrote

Russia doesn't seem to understand that in many other countries, journalists aren't controlled by the state. They've had censorship for so long, they forget what freedom of speech is.

Though more likely they know the above full well, and still say things that aren't true as part of their information war on the west.

6

UnicornLock t1_j6mpn7b wrote

It's not complicated, just easily misapplied. In the rest of the world, left/right is about economic policy. Notice how "The Liberal Party of Australia is a centre-right political party" doesn't actually explain why they'd be the scum party. That's just more US bias.

11