>How could Russia do that, exactly, in a newly independent country?

The same way they do in every other country: inserting agents, propaganda, misinformation, sabotaging (and sometimes murdering) people who disagree with them.

All that is especially easy in a newly independent country, where political structures and norms are not well established.

Doubly so when many people speak Russian and/or are sympathetic.

Crimea being newly independent made them more vulnerable to outside influences, not less.

>Coups aren't exactly political.

Parliamentary votes aren't coups.

[removed]

Who with enough money thrown their way will do Iran’s bidding .

Tor is safer for anonymous post .

It’s British Columbia. Why not put it in the headline, cbs news?

>Again, what would they be, and why wouldn't Zelensky just say no to everything? Why would Putin willingly give up his leverage for nothing?

The point is that both parties set up pre-conditions for diplomatic negotiations, which the other party is not willing to meet, hence the military conflict. However, Russia, as the aggressor, is the only party that wants to continue the conflict, and has no justifiable reason to be in the conflict, so it is their responsibility to end the war if they want to negotiate.

Ukraine can't do that if they want to maintain their sovereignty, Russia can do that while maintaining their sovereignty.

>It can quickly become an unpopular quagmire, for example.

How would it be an unpopular quagmire? Support for Ukraine is at an all time high, and vice versa for Russia, especially in Europe. NATO troops in Ukraine would help out a great deal in kicking out Russians out of Ukraine, judging by the pace that Ukrainians were able to retrieve territory.

The reason that NATO troops aren't in Ukraine is that they don't want to potentially trigger MAD, that's it.

>The point was that MAD doesn't give you peace of mind. Or any kind of certainty.

Exactly, that's why NATO doesn't want to attack Russia, because they don't want to risk the chance of triggering MAD.

Consider. Non headline.

[removed]

You forgot to mention that the Pakistan government gave support and protection to the Taliban, while the US invaded Afghanistan, to undermine the US Government's influence in Afghanistan. Now they are reaping what they sowed.

I personally find bidens response deliberate, and intriguing.

He made no explanations, and was very short and said "no".

And that could sometimes means he is deliberately answering the specific question precisely.

Iow, it could be possible the US is sending new f-16 to Poland and Poland is sending old ones to Ukraine, for example. I'm not saying that I think this is happening, but sometimes precise short answers can be for reasons like that.

It's called polyester, not microfiber. There's a hell of a lot more of polyester clothing on this planet than microfiber towels.

International Law are a set of rules created by dominant players (ie. United States) using their leverage to largely benefit themselves. They have been imposed on smaller players because the alternative is far worse. So yeah, enjoy our middle finger salute.

Maybe Germany will dare us again and speed up the process :)

Great we have ww3 date

> In December 1991, Ukraine held a referendum and Ukrainians voted for independence. This essentially marked the end of the Soviet Union.

I said as much - it was a choice between independent Ukraine and the Soviet Union, not a choice between independent Russia and independent Ukraine. Then Ukraine stripped the autonomous status.

> True, but only half the story. Russia was working just as hard to suppress pro-Ukraine sentiment. You forgot that part.

Haven't seen any sources. How could Russia do that, exactly, in a newly independent country?

> Ukraine won that battle by political means (the pro-Ukraine parliament ousted the pro-Russian president).

Coups aren't exactly political.

Since Ukrainian military personnel have already been traveling the world for arty, infantry, and commo training, I would not be surprised if they're already zipping around in cockpits.

[removed]

When the collective world walks away from the Olympics because of Russia they will find out.

They can have new Olympics with only Iran, China, Korea, Russia

Or they can have actual Olympics, without Russia, because nobody gives a fuck about Russia👌 they made their bed and now they can deal with the consequences for decades and decades to come

Oh right, those evil starving children. How dare they make Murica mad. Forgive me, genius. Oh, and those trillions mostly went to American corporations. Jackass.

[deleted]

[deleted]

I remember back in 2007 I was on a trip with a woman from China. They allowed her, or her husband to leave the country at one time, never both together.

[removed]

Any aircraft sold by the US to foreign governments can be "dumbed down" in capability and many are. That certainly includes the nuclear carry capability.

Regardless, I think this position has more to do with the difficulty of long-term logistics support than aircraft capability. While it is possible (and not uncommon) for F-16 units to deploy far from their home bases, long-term support is expensive and complex, and requires a ton of training for maintenance and support engineers.

When you read about a tank system or anti-aircraft missile system needing lots of training, with a fighter aircraft multiply that need by an order of magnitude. It's not that it can't be done, it's just complex and expensive, far beyond the cost of the aircraft itself.

hope france still end up sending the mirages

[deleted]