Explain why Israel should give up their security to give Ukraine weapons.

I doubt it,if anything Ukraine will keep receiving military aid for years in the future. The conflict will be there forever now ( no matter how this war goes) so it would not make sense to send it back.

You do realize there are more options than NATO, ruzzia, or strict neutrality, right? That countries are capable of signing mutual defense treaties outside of NATO? Sweden and Finland can each or both sign mutual defense treaties with the US and other NATO members independently, and use that as the same level of safety that NATO can provide

Vile air shit like "being neutral" and "not getting involved"?

Mixed messages:

No: Germany, US, Italy, Hungary, Switzerland, UK, Austria, Brasil Yes: None We haven't decided finally: all other.

So where exactly is the mixed message?

"ISIS 2.0"

The BBC isn't state media.

[removed]

Well dont mind us making our own nuclear bombs then that U.S fought us on. At this point it feels like some are more interested in giving Russia the middlefinger than the actual safety of these countries. You should know by now they intend to use those nuclear on us, so we would be held hostage in that situation, without the protection we simply has to stay out meaning we cant have nato on our soil as that puts an target on us with no proper protection. What would deter them from trying then? Nothing really, we would be guessing, russia might be tempted and guess what, then we would absolutely have to make a hard choice and that's sad, because we do not want to be put in this position again but not surprised the zero care in this situation for the possible outcome of such a sollution and what would happen to all us us, it would affect everyone. And you bring in Iceland they dont fucking have a military.

If you own a KFC in Florida you might want to say yes and house him

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 56%. (I'm a bot)

> An Iranian court has sentenced two bloggers to ten and a half years in prison each for dancing in the streets in support of the nationwide protests which have swept the country since September.

> The couple - Amir Mohammad Ahmadi, 22 and Astiyazh Haqiqi, 21 - shared a video of themselves dancing Azadi Square in Iran's capital Tehran to show support for the protests after the death of 22-year-old Kurdish woman Mahsa Amini in custody of the Iranian morality police.

> The couple have also been charged with "Colluding with the intention of disrupting national security and promoting propaganda."

Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: couple^#1 protest^#2 charged^#3 ban^#4 two-year^#5

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 84%. (I'm a bot)

> A Chinese province of more than 80 million people will lift restrictions on unmarried people having children and remove caps on the number of babies as part of a national drive to increase the country's birth rate.

> National reproduction policies do not explicitly ban unmarried women from having children but proof of marriage is often required for parents to access free services including prenatal healthcare, a mother's salary during maternity leave, and job protection.

> China's government has been introducing a growing list of measures and legislative changes to encourage more people to have children.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: people^#1 birth^#2 children^#3 marriage^#4 government^#5

> Except I haven't seen any examples of that.

How did Russian troops disguised as independent mercenaries manage to invade and conquer Crimea in 2014 with hardly any resistance from the local defence forces?

If they'd believed the invaders were independent, they'd have fought. No army surrenders their country to nameless bandits.

That they didn't fight is evidence they knew the invaders were backed by Moscow. Which is evidence that Moscow suborned them before the invasion began.

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 75%. (I'm a bot)

> German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Brazil's freshly inaugurated President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva traded barbs late Monday on who's responsible for Russia's invasion in Ukraine, as the latter suggested that Kyiv could also be at fault.

> Following the amicable start of a joint press conference, in which the Brazilian president said that he wants to finalize the EU trade deal "By the end of the current semester," the mood turned sour after Lula raised the war in Ukraine and rejected Germany's appeal to support Kyiv with weapons and ammunition.

> He also rejected the possibility that Brazil could help Ukraine to fend off Russian missile or drone attacks by selling its units of the German-made Gepard air defense tanks along with corresponding ammunition: "Brazil has no interest in handing over munitions that can be used in the war between Ukraine and Russia," Lula said.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukraine^#1 Lula^#2 Brazil^#3 war^#4 Russia^#5

No social media, no leaving the country, no bail and most important no lawyer. Smth.

Hey that's not bad! I agree.

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

If you want to analogise, it's more like alcohol. First The Man takes The Drink, then The Drink takes The Man.

should have PAID THEM BETTER you tory cheap bastards

but then, they don't want a public service as it is

Gotta love that democracy!

Religion is as much a virus as a tool, a parasitic force that infects then uses the hosts to infect others. In that context, I can absolutely blame the virus.

Or lick the biggest honeypot he can find.

When the war is over and if Ukraine wins do they give back any weapons or vehicles they were given?