Recent comments in /f/worldnews

BlueJinjo t1_j9jo6xm wrote

Invading a country is significantly harder than defending a country.. If Russia was invaded they'd also use nukes.

If the loss of life would definitely be NONCATACLYSMIC, NATO forces would already be at Moscow's doorsteps..

I don't think you've ever opened a history book. Finish high school and college and then maybe we can have a discussion

1

BadYabu t1_j9jmp7v wrote

You gotta understand bro that not every comment you read on Reddit is written by an actual thinking lay person.

Any article that involves Russia, Ukraine or China the trolls come in full force to disseminate carefully curated talking points.

The vast majority of Redditors who said the US did it are likely hosting multiple accounts and getting paid for it. The remaining minority are gullible fools

2

curlyhairedmermaid t1_j9jkt9g wrote

Wow if only there was a precedence of the US denying them help from the world food bank. Or offering them basic staples in exchange for things like infrastructure wiring and cattle tails to weaken their economy. Or the US putting up marine barricades to prevent ships leaving ports or docking in NK.

Begging you to listen to people from NK besides the ones funded by right wing think tanks. loyal Citizen of Puongyang in Seoul

−9

BlueJinjo t1_j9jjw21 wrote

You think NATO wouldn't suffer losses as well when supply chains are interrupted due to the harsh winters + when a unified Russian front defends itself?

NATO would win but it would burn so much money and most importantly lives on both sides.

There's essentially 0% chance this happens. For whatever reason, this sensationalist sub is rooting for it.. it's similar to the propensity of this sub to expect a full on militaristic invasion between India and china every time there's a border dispute which will continue to happen for the next 10+ years. Stop snorting crack

−2

TheBusStop12 t1_j9jjhxy wrote

No it hasn't, just a single report of a once celebrated journalist who has gone of the deep end making up conspiracy theories to stay relevant. Literally no reputable media wanted to publish his "report"

He tried the same bullshit with Syria and was rightfully called out

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2017/07/04/opcw-just-trashed-seymour-hershs-khan-sheikhoun-conspiracy-theory/

No one else has been able to verify his claims

6

TheBusStop12 t1_j9jituz wrote

As stated numerous times in recent years Seymour Hersh has fallen into the deep end of conspiracy theories and making up pure bullshit. As proven already by Bellingcat in 2017 when he was making up pro Russian bullshit in Syria

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2017/07/04/opcw-just-trashed-seymour-hershs-khan-sheikhoun-conspiracy-theory/

There's a reason the media ignores it. Show me another source that isn't based on the ranting of a single lunatic trying to stay relevant. No one, and I mean absolutely no one has been able to verify his claims

The pipeline was useless to Russia as it was never going to open again. It was just costing Gazprom tons of money. At least this way they could gage the Wests reaction to sabotage and see what they could get away with. Europe doesn't need Russian gas anymore, it has no purpose as leverage

6

Scouse420 t1_j9jhkct wrote

Hasn’t it literally just came out that it was officially the Americans that blew it up?

Edit for anyone who sees this the source for this is dubious; misinformed at best and casts massive doubt on my initial statement.

Leaving this up for transparency.

−6