Recent comments in /f/worldnews
ReadyToWork20 t1_j9o92if wrote
Reply to Moldova denies Russian claim of planned provocation against Transnistria, urges calm by SlightEngineering896
Romania now is the time to send troops in before the disgusting Russians expand further
LittleStar854 t1_j9o8xe5 wrote
Reply to Russian Defence Ministry accuses Ukraine of preparing provocations to attack Transnistria by WhoStoleMyPassport
Is there anything that doesn't provoke Russia? How is Ukraine helping Moldova to end the Russian invasion of Moldova a bad thing?
pauelena t1_j9o8pmk wrote
Reply to comment by jogarz in Erdogan drops idea to postpone elections by sherry_waseer
Mid 2022 is nearly a year ago! The Ukrainian grain deal and the recent earthquakes cemented his image as a powerful statesman.
Putin and Erdogan should never be underestimated! No matter what they do or say, no matter how suicidal their policies might be, they are practically worshipped by the vast majority of their population. Talk to the average Turk in Germany and you'd think Erdoğan is some kind of demigod.
The opposition lacks a credible leader that could pose a realistic threat to Erdoğan's re-election.
[deleted] t1_j9o8et8 wrote
Grunchlk t1_j9o8bxd wrote
Reply to comment by 93scaro in Iran acknowledges accusation it enriched uranium to 84% by bildo72
Iran has had the capability to build a bomb for at least 20 years. If they were trying to build one, they'd already have an arsenal full of them.
- Iran has mastered the fuel cycle. They have advanced centrifuges and thus enriching uranium to weapons grade is trivial for them. The bigger question is why haven't they?
- Iran has missiles capable of carrying a miniaturized nuclear warhead, yet they have only conventional warheads in their arsenal.
- Iran is believed to have conducted a number of implosion tests pre-2003. This would indicate they have enough knowledge for a trigger device.
Iran is using the threat of building a bomb as a tool for negotiations. Note how when the JCPOA was in effect Iran didn't enrich above 19.75%. Then once the US abandoned the agreement and forced the EU into non-compliance Iran cranked the purity up to 60+%. Now we're at 84%. Why would Iran keep increasing the purity while simultaneously letting everyone know? Because it's about securing a new deal.
However, it's also a warning that if anyone attacks Iran, they will purse a bomb and have one in less than 6 months.
throwaway29301816303 t1_j9o80td wrote
Reply to Russian Defence Ministry accuses Ukraine of preparing provocations to attack Transnistria by WhoStoleMyPassport
How are they even going to get to transnistria?
Hawkay t1_j9o7iwt wrote
Reply to comment by stellarblackhole1 in Netanyahu said to huddle repeatedly with military brass over possible attack on Iran by Lionel54321
No no, it’s a great idea to let a country run by religious zealots who constantly call for the destruction of Israel and kill their own citizens access to nuclear weapons.
Just perfect.
camaxtlumec t1_j9o7gx8 wrote
Reply to comment by Skurrio in Australia to make area the size of Germany a marine park in Southern Ocean | Plan to triple size of Macquarie Island protection zone to shield ‘remote wildlife wonderland’ by newnemo
It's an area roughly 3.428 hours by 2.5 hours of 250km/h driving on the Autobahn.
Turtl3Bear t1_j9o7exp wrote
Reply to comment by Far_Quote_5336 in North Korean state media urges rejection of 'poisoned candy' foreign aid despite food shortages | World News | Sky News by rmaccr
Worked out fine for Mao Zedong
If you control the media you can literally just tell your people that you've saved them, and they'll buy it hook line and sinker.
China exported food every year of the great famine, people here still spout off about how wonderful a hero Mao was, especially those old enough to have suffered through the famine. Younger people have a more nuanced view but even then are generally supportive.
newnemo OP t1_j9o70k6 wrote
psyics t1_j9o6vcs wrote
Reply to comment by 93scaro in Iran acknowledges accusation it enriched uranium to 84% by bildo72
It’s a political decision not a technical challenge that is the reason they do not have a functional weapon. If they decided today to manufacture one, it would take approximately 5 days for them to accumulate the required mass of HEU needed for a weapon and approximately 3 to 6 months for them to fashion the core into a deliverable weapon. Than probably another 6 months to miniaturize it into a warhead that could be usable on a ballistic missile for delivery
It should be noted that even though the article is saying they reached 84% purity it’s being slightly manipulative as Iran did not accumulate 84% enriched uranium which would be the real issue if they did. They have still not gone above 60% accumulated
[deleted] t1_j9o6m3b wrote
camaxtlumec t1_j9o6jn0 wrote
Skurrio t1_j9o6gp1 wrote
Reply to Australia to make area the size of Germany a marine park in Southern Ocean | Plan to triple size of Macquarie Island protection zone to shield ‘remote wildlife wonderland’ by newnemo
As a German, I don't understand this Unit. Could you please convert it to Multiples of the Saarland, Fußballfelder or Bierkästen?
1BannedAgain t1_j9o625c wrote
Why shouldn’t a sovereign state create nuclear weapons to deter foreign invaders?
[deleted] t1_j9o5xiq wrote
93scaro t1_j9o5fpu wrote
Realistically speaking, how much longer will it take until they have nuclear weapons ready? Anyone who has some expertise in the subject?
ash_ninetyone t1_j9o59za wrote
Reply to Russian Defence Ministry accuses Ukraine of preparing provocations to attack Transnistria by WhoStoleMyPassport
Ah yeah. A country that is too busy trying to fight and push an invading army out of its Eastern flank can also manage to send said army to the west to invade a neighbouring country too, both of which happen to see their future as more aligned with the EU. Makes total sense 🙄 Wars are hard enough to fight, let alone on multiple fronts.
You look at Transistria or Transdniestria (or whatever it wants to call itself) and the only logical conclusion is it being corrupt. The one guy in charge was born in Russia (no doubt then he'd be pro-Russia).
Everything is provied by Sherriff, a company founded by an ex-KGB member, that company is pretty much the only company in existence there. It has a monopoly in a bunch of sectors. Putin sees it as a chance to create another Belarus.
There's a clip going around on Twitter of an allegedly 'Moldovian' crowd chanting 'Ruzziya' which is misrepresenative as all Russian propagandists are. As far as I'm aware, most of Moldova is on the side of Ukraine, while the government there is trying to deal with subversive attempts by Russia to destabilise the country. This is also concurrent with some other factions there anyway that would like to see Moldova also unify with Romania (which by default would also pull it into the EU and NATO).
[deleted] t1_j9o564c wrote
Reply to comment by WhoStoleMyPassport in Russian Defence Ministry accuses Ukraine of preparing provocations to attack Transnistria by WhoStoleMyPassport
[removed]
autotldr t1_j9o4y7r wrote
Reply to Russian Defence Ministry accuses Ukraine of preparing provocations to attack Transnistria by WhoStoleMyPassport
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 67%. (I'm a bot)
> The Ministry of Defence of Russia has published a statement about the Ukrainian government supposedly preparing provocations against the non-recognised Transnistria region.
> The Russian Ministry has declared that Ukraine is planning to use a staged offensive of Russian forces from the territory of Transnistria as "a reason for invasion".
> Russian President Vladimir Putin revoked a 2012 decree on Russia's foreign policy course that suggested that Russia would continue to actively search for ways to resolve the conflict in Transnistria with respect to Moldova's sovereignty, territorial integrity and neutral status.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Moldova^#1 Russian^#2 statement^#3 Russia^#4 Ministry^#5
pmmichalowski t1_j9o4owp wrote
Reply to comment by macross1984 in Ukraine: deliberate destruction of culture must stop, say rights experts by BurstYourBubbles
They do, Russification and destruction of other cultures is mainstay for centuries.
Scapenator1 t1_j9o4e6e wrote
Reply to comment by pauelena in Erdogan drops idea to postpone elections by sherry_waseer
If Turks love him, than is that the biggest problem. Although I doubt you are right on that
WhoStoleMyPassport OP t1_j9o46na wrote
Reply to Russian Defence Ministry accuses Ukraine of preparing provocations to attack Transnistria by WhoStoleMyPassport
Kremlin translator: Russia plans to attack Ukraine via Transnistria dressed in full Uniforms.
jogarz t1_j9o31lc wrote
Reply to comment by reddebian in Erdogan drops idea to postpone elections by sherry_waseer
Not all of the opposing parties, the main Kurdish party (the HDP) is sitting on the outside of the alliance, though it is probably quietly supporting it.
Turkish voters are very nationalist, and any independent Kurdish representation gets inevitably accused of links with the PKK, so letting the HDP formally into the alliance would be electoral suicide.
v3ritas1989 t1_j9o9s99 wrote
Reply to comment by reddebian in Erdogan drops idea to postpone elections by sherry_waseer
Didn't he start up the civil war against the kurds again last time they tried this were he was expected to lose?