Recent comments in /f/worldnews

Woodlog82 t1_jefneq4 wrote

I did not wish anything on you, person. That was someone else's post in which they questioned your capabilities to not drown in the shower. I would also like to question them, too. Mentally and emotionally you don't seem to know how to respond in a good way.

Addendum: Also still here, but whatever feeds your delusions. 🤷🏻‍♂️ I gave an answer to the question a few post before and you are quite of the deep end; why would I engage in your tomfoolery?

2

DaddyIsAFireman t1_jefn8b3 wrote

I too used to think this. There are lots of videos online that can and do explain how and why that doesn't work much better than I can.

People much more intelligent than you or I have attempted to solve this problem and failed. I challenge you to find a peer reviewed video of article explaining how it does work if you don't believe me.

12

Old-Example-1023 t1_jefmrh1 wrote

Yeah man i find it very amusing that USA hated the only democracy in the region, good thing is current govt has been the most pro-western govt in our history But Biden is still living in 2000s let's see Western companies are setting their units here.

8

autotldr t1_jefmox9 wrote

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)


> LONDON - Russian and Belarusian players will be able to compete at Wimbledon as neutral athletes after the All England Club on Friday reversed its ban from last year.

> The same conditions will apply for Lawn Tennis Association tournaments used by players as grass-court warmups for the sport's oldest Grand Slam tournament.

> "There was a strong and very disappointing reaction from some governing bodies in tennis to the position taken by the All England Club and the LTA last year with consequences which, if continued, would be damaging to the interests of players, fans, The Championships and British tennis," the club said.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: player^#1 Club^#2 tennis^#3 year^#4 tournament^#5

3

kentgoodwin t1_jefmm1h wrote

How the rights of nature are defined might vary with different pieces of legislation. In this case you would have to find the Ecuadorian laws that spell that out.

I am not sure what you mean by "property rights concept". A tree doesn't own property, nor does a butterfly.

26