Artanthos

Artanthos t1_j485xef wrote

And the government will be another 30 years behind that.

Assuming you can get politicians to vote to replace themselves or convince the general population to go along with being governed by computers.

Neither is likely on any time scale, no matter how advanced the AI is.

Something you left off you chart is trust. A lot of people will not trust computers to govern or make decisions that affect how they are governed. It won’t matter how good the computers might be at it.

1

Artanthos t1_j46z5t4 wrote

Since I am involved in my agencies current software update, yes.

We are currently updating our front end from ActiveX to a front end more appropriate to 2010. We are looking at 3-5 years for all projects to be completed.

The back end is running on an Access database. Updating the back end is not part of the contract.

Once in place, the new systems are supposed last at least 20 years. I will be retiring by then.

1

Artanthos t1_j3tyf9l wrote

AI doesn’t meet the legal requirements to hold political office.

Past a certain level, those requirements include citizenship and age and are defined by the Constitution.

Changing those requirements would be extraordinarily difficult and would have to be signed off on by three different supermajorities . Supermajorities that would personally be adversely affected.

1

Artanthos t1_j2e15a8 wrote

Step 1: grow trees, which pulls CO2 from the atmosphere

Step 2: cut trees down and sell them

Step 3: compost trees or burn trees, which releases some, but not all, of the captured carbon back into the atmosphere.

Step 4: goto step 1

​

This results in a net carbon sink.

1

Artanthos t1_j29dnu7 wrote

It’s pulling more CO2 from the air than it’s adding,

New trees are replanted, pulling CO2 from the air. Meanwhile a lot of the old trees get mulched or buried in landfills, which is sequestered carbon.

1