Bensemus
Bensemus t1_iufz7bj wrote
Reply to comment by Ivanthegorilla in Fires from exploding e-bike batteries multiply in NYC — sometimes fatally by zsreport
Right. Australia is running space mines to supply the world with lithium.
Bensemus t1_iufz4uk wrote
Reply to comment by justcharliey in Fires from exploding e-bike batteries multiply in NYC — sometimes fatally by zsreport
It’s GM that is the king of fires. They had to recall hundreds of thousands of Boots due to faulty batteries. Tesla hasn’t had any such recall.
Bensemus t1_iufyzqm wrote
Reply to comment by Angelaira74 in Fires from exploding e-bike batteries multiply in NYC — sometimes fatally by zsreport
No they haven’t. GM had a full quarter where they built only like 5 cars during the recall. Tesla never had to recall hundreds of thousands of cars for faulty batteries. GM is also suing Panasonic for billions for the recall.
Bensemus t1_iufoe98 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in All Space Questions thread for week of October 30, 2022 by AutoModerator
Basically not at all. The brightest things in the universe easily outshine whole galaxies despite being star size or a bit larger. Andromeda is only 4 million light years away but it’s too dim to see without a telescope. Can’t get past the inverse square law.
Bensemus t1_iufnxwa wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in All Space Questions thread for week of October 30, 2022 by AutoModerator
It should be pretty obvious. You are able to look in real time at Jupiter and it’s moons. Webb looked at a single point for 12h to capture those galaxies. Hubble had to look for over 100h to take the deep field image. The human eye can’t collect light for 12h to create an image. The eye also only sees visible light so everything Webb sees is invisible to us.
Brightness falls off exponentially with distance.
Bensemus t1_iubtu1a wrote
Reply to comment by Kwintin01 in A Monster Black Hole has Been Found Right in our Backyard (Astronomically Speaking) by joosth3
That would be quite massive. Our Sun is actually a massive star relative to what’s out there. It’s on the top 10% my mass. The vast majority of stars are tiny.
However compared to how big stars can get even ours is quite small.
Bensemus t1_iu6rwk2 wrote
Reply to comment by iPlayWithWords13 in EU approves effective ban on new fossil fuel cars from 2035 by Wagamaga
Issues that are easily mitigated.
Bensemus t1_iu6rpvh wrote
Reply to comment by DiplomatikEmunetey in EU approves effective ban on new fossil fuel cars from 2035 by Wagamaga
If the goal is never set it will drag on way longer. Better to set an aggressive goal now and get the ball rolling. The law can be repealed or extended if it turns out we are failing but if we are failing we will have much bigger issues.
Bensemus t1_iu6re8q wrote
Reply to comment by EnemyOfEloquence in EU approves effective ban on new fossil fuel cars from 2035 by Wagamaga
If you are switching to an EV it is better for the environment. While you are losing the pollution that went into making the car and you need to make the EV it’s still greener. This is because the vast majority of an ICE car’s pollution comes from using it. Basically only hybrids are efficient enough to bother keeping.
Bensemus t1_iu6r05d wrote
Reply to comment by volkinaxe in E.U. plans for only electric new vehicles by 2035 ‘without precedent’ by do_you_even_ship_bro
It’s really not hard. Australia is the leader in lithium mining (not China, which is actually 3rd and a quarter of Australia). The US is starting to develop its lithium reserves along with other countries. Tech is being worked on to reduce the cost of extracting lithium from salt water. It can also be extracted from geothermal plants.
Bensemus t1_iu6qrzg wrote
Reply to comment by Sad_Ad2489 in E.U. plans for only electric new vehicles by 2035 ‘without precedent’ by do_you_even_ship_bro
The great thing is they are just greener even on current power grids using fossil fuels. This is because ICE cars are just terrible. They set the bar extremely low. Renewables are also constantly being added as we expand our grids and not just because they are green either. They can also just be the cheaper option which makes it even easier to do.
Bensemus t1_iu16tu9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Expanding space is observed in the Universe, the term "Expanding Space" seems a perfunctory label, it must be an enormous amount of energy to accelerate the Universe. What is the science behind it? by [deleted]
Dark energy is the name of the cause of the expanding space. What it actually is isn’t known.
Bensemus t1_iu16he5 wrote
Reply to comment by the_zelectro in US Space Systems debriefs Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin executives on military space weapon applications and opportunities by upyoars
Has Blue launched anything to orbit? They’ve proven basically none of their tech while SpaceX is the worlds leading rocket launch provider.
Bensemus t1_iu16527 wrote
Reply to comment by kevintieman in US Space Systems debriefs Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin executives on military space weapon applications and opportunities by upyoars
Raptor is an engine design that has never been used before. BE-4 is a well known design but using new fuel. SpaceX is also has built over 100 V1 engines and has already built multiple V2 engines. Blue likely has yet to build 10 BE-4s
Bensemus t1_iu137ev wrote
Reply to comment by XchillydogX in New James Webb Space Telescope photos show a massive galaxy cluster bending light by GullyShotta
That was the first image released. They pointed Webb at the same place Hubble looked. They saw way more than Hubble say while only looking for about 1/10th the time.
Bensemus t1_iu12o3r wrote
Reply to comment by Tannir48 in Ancient microbes may have survived below Mars' surface - CNN by GullyShotta
They aren’t discounting the actual study. They are discounting the article that doesn’t understand the study it’s reporting on.
Bensemus t1_itrax6f wrote
Reply to comment by foma_kyniaev in Deflecting asteroids is not enough — we need to know when they approach by burtzev
Planet killer is one that threatens life on the planet. Earth wasn't destroyed by Mars sized impact so no asteroid is actually threatening the structure of the planet.
15km is pushing humans towards extinction but not guaranteed, billions would die. 400m would be a natural disaster that could kill millions or more, depending on where it hit.
Bensemus t1_itr9yuf wrote
Reply to comment by FaufiffonFec in Deflecting asteroids is not enough — we need to know when they approach by burtzev
It 100% did. Any impact on any body will move it. The greater the difference between the two objects the less change there will be.
With a planet killer asteroid it will be much larger so a DART sized craft will change its orbit much less but it will still change it. So for such an asteroid we ether need to hit it years out for that tiny change to have time to propagate or we hit it with something with more energy.
Bensemus t1_itniup1 wrote
Reply to comment by Imaginary-Location-8 in NASA poised to break sound barrier without the sonic boom by Ssider69
The crack is the tip breaking the sound barrier. A towel is just a really shitty whip.
Bensemus t1_istop2c wrote
Reply to comment by ChubbyWanKenobie in The Europa Clipper mission may be as exciting as a manned mars mission and it’s only two years away by Wide-Escape-5618
Your numbers are off. It's closer to 100 billion when the dust settles for SLS and Orion plus the missions they fly. If Starship works it will cost a fraction of what SLS costs and will actually make Moon presence possible.
Bensemus t1_isn8rn0 wrote
Reply to comment by Light_bulbnz in How did they fix the RMBK reactors? by Henricus_3141
They had tried to run the test a few times but it failed. It failed for the las time because they couldn’t fully shut down the reactor due to power needs and had to push the test to the next shift when power needs were less. It wasn’t about taking the reactor offline for maintenance.
Bensemus t1_is7sqt9 wrote
Reply to comment by Klai8 in EU votes to force all phones to use same charger by 2024 by WallStreetDoesntBet
It's easier to make stuff up about Apple and bash that.
Bensemus t1_is7sjvy wrote
Reply to comment by shawntw77 in EU votes to force all phones to use same charger by 2024 by WallStreetDoesntBet
You have a basic lack of understanding. Apple does spec the cable but you are allowed to use third party ones. I have a few third party cables and all of them work. The brick is completely open. Apple has no control over what brick you use.
The new rule the EU is proposing would prohibit Apple from restricting functionality to only approved cables. They would have to work with any valid cables that adhere to the USB and Type-C spec.
Stop creating bogymen to then get angry at them. Apple already uses Type-C on Macs and iPads. They've literally shown what it would look like and people still complain about fake stuff.
Bensemus t1_is7rzl4 wrote
Reply to comment by zapho300 in EU votes to force all phones to use same charger by 2024 by WallStreetDoesntBet
You are being downvoted by idiots. You can use any USB charger with an iPhone. I use generic ones and Samsung ones as well as Apple ones. They are all just a USB port which is an open standard. You do need to use a lighting CABLE. This is a different thing than the wall connector and technically none are chargers. The charger is built into the phone.
Bensemus t1_iugyg2y wrote
Reply to comment by justcharliey in Fires from exploding e-bike batteries multiply in NYC — sometimes fatally by zsreport
Him as a person has nothing to do with it. Tesla doesn’t have a fire issue.