CactusBoyScout

CactusBoyScout OP t1_izg6zgi wrote

NYC does have a "right to build" system that basically says you can build whatever you want as long as it adheres to current zoning.

The big fights over development that you read about are almost always because the developer wants to change the zoning... often from industrial (think former waterfront factories) or light commercial (the single-story retail in Harlem that nearly became a big development) to higher-density residential.

Zoning is essentially about maintaining the status quo in an area. So if you want to increase density at all or build residential where it previously didn't exist, you typically have to go through these painful rezoning processes where every local leader gets a veto and it takes years.

I think a more serious solution would be to just loosen zoning citywide.

21

CactusBoyScout OP t1_izfz8sh wrote

Yeah another article said that one of the biggest roadblocks is simply staffing shortages in City Hall... caused partly by his requirement of 5 days a week in the office.

38

CactusBoyScout OP t1_izfyyze wrote

You're not going to get super accurate population numbers after 2020 because that's when the last census was done. So it's just estimates after 2020.

But that census showed a growth of 629,000 people between 2010 and 2020.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/12/us/new-york-city-population-growth.html

And housing supply grew by 193,000 in that same period.

Source: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/1c9138dc24064b2e8142ff156345a719

6

CactusBoyScout OP t1_izfv2kk wrote

Sure. Here's a good starting point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_housing_shortage

> Between 2009 and 2018, according to the New York City Comptroller, New York gained 500,000 new residents, but built only 100,000 new housing units.

And for vacant stabilized units: https://citylimits.org/2022/11/17/empty-rent-stabilized-units-in-nyc-decreased-this-year-as-warehousing-debate-rages/

> Property owners have registered 38,621 of the city’s roughly 1 million rent-stabilized units as vacant, according to the 2022 records provided by New York State Homes and Community Renewal (HCR).

9

CactusBoyScout OP t1_izfu2qe wrote

This is just inaccurate, sorry.

NYC's population has grown by hundreds of thousands while housing supply has grown far more slowly.

We need 400,000 new housing units just to make up for the deficit we got ourselves into over the last decade.

There aren't half a million vacant apartments lying around. Supply is absolutely the problem. And there are only 38,000 rent-stabilized units being held vacant... mostly because the rent doesn't justify the renovations required.

19

CactusBoyScout OP t1_izfgtm0 wrote

> He noted that the creation of new housing has lagged far behind population growth.

> “There is nowhere for people to go,” he said. “It’s not complicated. We have more people than homes.”

TL;DR the proposal would basically remove a lot of roadblocks for smaller residential developments like exempting them from environmental impact requirements. It would also bring more of the process under one roof… the DOB would take over some fire safety stuff from FDNY.

I just want to know about parking minimums. Those have got to go. More and more cities (all with worse transit than NY) are eliminating them entirely. But we still have minimums everywhere except Lower Manhattan.

67

CactusBoyScout OP t1_iyhy82y wrote

And it’s not just bed capacity. Someone who works in this field commented on the first NYTimes article saying basically that the whims of the mayor won’t change established legal guidelines for committing people or the decades of court case rulings that got us to this point.

Adams can’t snap his fingers and make the state hold more people in facilities. There might be an increase in 72 hour holds but that’s about it.

10

CactusBoyScout t1_ix49cbw wrote

I basically stopped driving in the city around the start of the pandemic. I had to do it again recently to move some furniture and I was really shocked at how much worse driving norms have gotten.

People driving on the shoulder of the BQE way more, obscured plates, casually running red lights, flashing brights at me for not running a red, etc. Truly feels lawless to a new degree.

2

CactusBoyScout t1_ivwcb21 wrote

I understand it’s complicated and costly. But they did it in Times Square and they could at least announce plans or intentions to do it other places.

It’s fine if their current approach is meant to be some temporary test. But once they’re done testing these things and haven’t found any big issues they should move on to planning something more permanent like an actual widening of the sidewalk.

Otherwise we end up with situations like the Willoughby Open Street where some powerful city insider got all the barriers removed one day with no input from anyone and it took a big public outcry to bring them back. Real physical changes are much harder to undo on a whim.

5