DoctorGuvnor

DoctorGuvnor t1_jeag5za wrote

The royalties bit only actually applies to the UK performances, so when I directed a production here in Australia we donated what would have been the royalties to the Perth Childrens' Hospital as a thank you and to show respect to the author's wishes.

141

DoctorGuvnor t1_jdumpnb wrote

When Desmond Bagley died he left one book unfinished (Juggernaut) and the manuscript of another that he had written years before, and not submitted to a publisher since he felt it wasn't up to his usual standard. (Night of Error)

Both books were later published, doing his reputation absolutely no good at all, although giving his publishers some extra money. Not cancelled, but they should have been. This is where a literary executor would have been useful.

1

DoctorGuvnor t1_jctplut wrote

What an interesting question!

After much thought I can narrow it down to three:

Huckleberry Finn, from Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. (Also from the Greg Matthews sequel, The Further Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.

Ed Ricketts from Cannery Row, Sweet Thursday and The Log From the Sea of Cortez (real person, but definitely a protagonist)

Toad from The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame.

Further thought has given me Keith Stewart from Trustee from the Toolroom by Nevil Shute (although many of his heroes are just as memorable)

and His Grace, Sir Samuel Vimes, Duke of Ankh Morpork, Blackboard Monitor and Commander of the City Watch from Terry Pratchett's Discworld.

7

DoctorGuvnor t1_ito9tfi wrote

I began professionally reviewing books in the early 80s. Over the years I have seen a steady decline in the quality of both orthography and proof-reading. At least one book, privately printed, was almost unreadable because of it.

Part of the problem is that costs are rising and often proofing can be air tasked or subbed out to freelancers, who don't have the experience, but are cheap.

At the very least, no book should have any error other than grammar or 'literals' (words spelled correctly, but the wrong word - their for there and so on) now we have spell-checkers.

But often, and increasingly, that's not true.

Just another reason to love old books.

7