Why did you like Utah better?

mobile home rental

off the top of my head I can think of 2 people i know personally who went to prison for deliberately setting cars on fire. Also note the burned out cars in the woods around Rochester, Manchester and many etc.

Blame me. Maybe it's shell shock / exploding car shock

i wouldn't joke about people lighting cars on fire. Someone is apt to do it.

Yes they tell him to file for a sign permit knowing there's a 0% chance it will be given

Been there done that. Jump through infinite hoops while simultaneously cutting endless red tape and chasing the ever receeding goalposts. Fun!

I'll take Felonies for Rest of My Life in Prison, Alex.

I like to go hiking and remote camping.

Too cheap to hire maintenance / security staff to go around after hours and make sure everything's ok?

Added benefit- they could have the janitor teach "Window Closing During Sub-Zero Weather 101"

Dear Advanced Degree Students:

Please do not open the windows, pile junk on the heating vent, and then call to say it's cold.

Since when did Oklahoma become the cutting edge of modernity in architecture or anything else? Lulz

Cheapest real estate is in the north (north of the mountains).

much of the grid is from the 1950s. Many more houses have been built, and larger houses with much larger electrical service and many more appliances.

If ***it's been up for over a year*** then it's abandoned. Likely the person forgot where he set it up.

Disclaimer I'm not a lawyer. But I don't see any way that could be harassing a hunter. No one has been hunting for a year. He's only storing the tree stand on your land.

Again, see disclaimer. But if someone leaves something on my property then it's mine. I don't see any criminal case being made that I stole it. I don't see any civil case either but talk to an actual lawyer if you are worried about that.

It's been that way for literal decades. ***NEWS FLASH!***

Technically, no. There are tons of rules and regulations about signs. A lot of it is under zoning. I'm not a lawyer or anything. I know about this topic from Christian ministry (starting a storefront mission, thrift store, etc). Here's a good real life example, I think. A code enforcement guy from the city says that my sign is illegal. Then he says I need a hundred thousand $ insurance on the sign. Then he tells me the general parameters of how he'll likely ignore the sign. Basically if it's not too much of a nuisance then the authorities ignore it.

Ask yourself- How many people do you know who have been fined for stapling a paper flyer to a pole? For me it's zero. "Everybody does it." Right?

It's just a meme? Well if it's political or otherwise causes outrage then it may be seen as a nuisance, so the authorities might get involved. I suppose it depends on how hard you kick the hornets nest, and blind luck.

It's impossible to say because rules constantly change and there's always a disclaimer. IE- they might not honor their own rules -because no reason.

That said, they let me fly out and back on an expired license. My fault. I just forgot about renewing. Would that work for someone else? Who knows?

If it were me, I'd bring the old license and well as the temp paper license and hope for the best.

Reference inflation vs the income and resources of elderly people.

I'm not. Trust me on that one.

That's part of it. Keep going.

My point was that if a claimed business is a scam that the state can shut it down. I wasn't buying your conspiracy theory. But if what you said were true, then the business should be shut down IMO.

Oh so no licenses needed for any of the building trades, and no licenses or state permissions of any kind to run a business? Good to know.

>First off, you don't need a license in NH to be a contractor.

Half true. You are a lawyer. You should know these things.

That is what you claimed, right?

*crickets*

I've said multiple times that I don't know what is going on here.

Nope not blaming anyone.

I am suggesting someone check out the situation before jumping to conclusions. Looking at the claimed gallons per minute in that well test might be a start.

Also, personally, I wouldn't accuse contractors of fraud, crimes, and various felonies sans evidence. But that's just me.

But yes, you're right. Seems to be a whole development. The more info that comes out in the comments, the more it seems to me there is a problem with the house itself. Now the person has said his well is 1000 feet deep. If I had known that from the beginning, my comments here would have been different. Didn't I say "not enough info" from the first? Oh yeah. I did.

I highly doubt that the builder used a tanker to dump water in the well. I would think that would be fraud rising to the level of a crime. But maybe I'm naive. Maybe that sort of thing does happen.

Yeah the water table might not be suitable. But "suitable" is subjective. Early settlers to the area would likely be fine with that amount of water (gallons per minute). A person with a well can't expect to use infinite amounts of water. You have to learn to live with what you have. If you dig another well, or improve the one you have etc there will still be limits. These are the realities.

I don't know (but suspect) that the buyer was given a reasonably accurate water test listing the gallons per minute from the well. If not, and if the test was faked, (and as you said tanker water dumped into the well to deceive etc) then I would want people to go to jail. Such things should not be allowed under penalty of law. But you would know more about that than me. -as far as what realistically could happen in a case like that.

---------------------------

General contractors, etc need licenses. If there was fraud like we're talking about here then those should be taken away. IMHO

if you run a well dry then you "literally have no water" until the well refills from ground water seeping into it. It's how wells work.

I believe the person also said they opened a tap before buying the house and had water at the sink (or whatever). So that means it's not that the well is bone dry all of the time.

-------------------------------

I don't know the answers to my own questions (above). I suspect that they were given the results of a well test and that the gallons per minute is in actuality what the results specify. I am NOT a lawyer. So I don't know how that would affect a law suit. I'm guessing it would not help.

Well not functioning? Is that actually the case here? What was the gallons per minute listed in the water test? Has the homeowner been using a lot more water than that?

-because having your own well =/= infinite supply of water on tap.