Environmental_Log344

Environmental_Log344 t1_j93b130 wrote

I can dream, can't I? Lol. The constitution gives us rights. I don't have to agree with all of it, just respect it. I can't change things that are written there. But I sure wish we could do away with the huge number of available firearms. Use them for hunting, no problem. How do you sort out the deer hunters from the human hunters? I have no idea how to plan or undertake this, nor does much of our government. They are letting it be for now but maybe my great grand kids will not see as many guns, or better yet, maybe firearms will be effectively banned by then. It's a tough issue. And I am going to vote in the direction of anything that reduces guns in irresponsible hands, if the issue is presented.

It's kind of snarky of you to assume I expect constitutional rights to be done away with at this point. Amendments could happen, but it's not likely. In the meantime, each opinion is valued.

Thank you for a thought -provoking bit of snark.

−1

Environmental_Log344 t1_j9138b9 wrote

It's a strong possibility that gun laws will toughen up, and I am very much in favor of that. The wife in your comment is thinking ahead. It's not what I would stock up on but if you are a gun type person, it's time to get them while you can. I pray they become impossible to purchase, sooner rather than later. And there she will be, all set set with a personal armory.

−6

Environmental_Log344 OP t1_j8pkysp wrote

You are right, except there are public high schools that offer trades. And I think community colleges are about to be free?

Agreed. Telling everyone their dilemma would just rush the process. They used that evaluation period to wipe up as much as they could. Poor students, went there for a high price and won't even get that worthless certificate of completion. Or the non-existent job placement assistance. Boy, have times changed.

Can you elaborate on this: "workers too; their directors and officers are likely legally obligated to do so, lest the investors be the ones defrauded". It isn't clear about the obligated party.

1

Environmental_Log344 OP t1_j8p8cu9 wrote

Stone Academy just ruined a few lives. If they knew they were about to tank, which they would know from the agency noticing them, they just got whatever they could get before the agency acted. Then they jumped ship. Of course, we were not there to really judge what was happening but it sounds like they could have come clean to the students before a fresh round of semester loans came up.

2

Environmental_Log344 OP t1_j8p70s1 wrote

That's true now but I know from experience that it was not that way in the 90's. The business schools used to do a great job but the easy availability of government loans brought out shady business people and by the time I moved on in 2000, it had started to get unethical. It became a real loan racket and I left without looking back.

2

Environmental_Log344 OP t1_j8p47kj wrote

Not all for-profits were bad in their day. I worked at a small for-profit in the 90's. It was run by two doctors and supplied the area with solidly trained medical assistants. The training was better than high school and less than college. It filled a niche: not every young person is meant for college but they needed training to be employable. The school was ethical and cared about its contribution to the workforce. But it had to close as the cost became too great for the owners to pass along to students.

I don't think there is much awareness of how helpful these training schools were for lower-middle class students. It helped them with upward mobility, without the fast food stage. We don't have these schools now that can be trusted like that school was. It's really a loss.

3