ExtonGuy
ExtonGuy t1_ixfdnhf wrote
Reply to comment by jrhoffa in TIL the Passemant astronomical clock in Versailles has shown the correct date, time, moon phase, planetary alignment, etc (accounting for leap years ) from 1750 and can display through 9999. by kitkatbloo
France adopted the Gregorian (modern ) calendar in 1782. Since then,1800 and 1900 have not been leap years, but I presume this clock was built to the old rules where they would be leap years.
ExtonGuy t1_ixalanv wrote
Reply to comment by Ape_Togetha_Strong in What are sone discoveries about space made before the advances of science and technology? by Limp_Confidence_1725
Story is that precession was discovered by Hipparchus of Rhodes, c. 150 BC. He compared star maps from 150 years earlier, with his own observations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipparchus#Precession_of_the_equinoxes_(146%E2%80%93127_BC)
ExtonGuy t1_ix0au7g wrote
Reply to TIL after a seizure left him paralyzed except for his left eyelid, Jean-Dominique Bauby (1952-1997) wrote the bestselling book "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" by blinking to select each letter as an assistant recited the alphabet to him. by chumloadio
I would have suggested Morse code, or some variant. Telegraphers used a lot of shortcuts for common words and phrases.
ExtonGuy t1_iwyy1kg wrote
I would look for a galaxy about 7.86 Mpc from us, in the direction opposite our motion through the CMBR. Since the average distance between galaxies is about 25 Mpc, there might not be any galaxies there.
550 / 70 = 7.86
ExtonGuy t1_iwswo2h wrote
Reply to comment by Kooky_Support3624 in Researchers have developed an alternative positioning system that is more robust and accurate than GPS, especially in urban settings. The working prototype that demonstrated this new mobile network infrastructure achieved an accuracy of 10 centimeters. by the_phet
"Pings"? And all this time I though it was a continuous binary phase-shift keying. More like a chirp or chipping.
ExtonGuy t1_iw4pkbu wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Will mankind ever travel outside our solar system? by savol_
I agree with most of that, except the religion part. I think the first wave of ark ships will be motivated by religious thoughts. Probably even more “religious” than the worst of todays groups. “We have to populate the galaxy before the infidels!”
ExtonGuy t1_iw4ot4u wrote
Reply to comment by horseback_heroism in Will mankind ever travel outside our solar system? by savol_
How about AI controlled ships, with human germ plasma in cold storage, and artificial wombs? There have already been a few sci-fi stories that have touched on this.
ExtonGuy t1_iw4odo0 wrote
“Forever” is a long time. I suggest 10 - 20 years to Mars, another 50 to the asteroid belt, then another 100 to Jupiter, etc. By the year 3500, humans will around Pluto. After that, some rich religious group might put together a generational starship, to go out to infinity (“… and beyond!”)
ExtonGuy t1_ivy1ycb wrote
Light shaking reported in populated areas, no injuries.
ExtonGuy t1_iujob9j wrote
Reply to comment by Aerosol668 in Why we don’t see aliens by Ggoods123
We have a sample of an intelligent civilization? Where, pray tell?
ExtonGuy t1_iufhm1l wrote
Reply to Conscious Reality Is Only a Memory of Unconscious Actions, Scientists Propose In Radical New Theory by mossadnik
Life is but a dream / it’s what you make it …
ExtonGuy t1_iuffpkm wrote
Reply to When the last star dies by trunktunk
When the last star dies, when the last black hole evaporates, the universe will be left with just photons, electrons, and neutrinos (and their antiparticles). These will never meet, or if in very very rare circumstances they do meet, no new mass/energy conversion will happen.
There is some wild speculation that there might be another Big Bang of some sort, born out of quantum foam … but there is no way to test that idea.
ExtonGuy t1_iue8sjv wrote
Reply to Please explain in simple words by Tatti_luck
It didn’t/ doesn’t take 14 billion years for the light from the BB to reach us. We (the material that became us) came into existence inside the BB … in the middle of an infinite space. The light from the BB started hitting us immediately, from all directions. It has been hitting us ever since. The light that is hitting now has been traveling for 14 billion years. It comes from a distance that used to be a lot closer, but is now 46 billion light-years away.
(Much simplified, but I hope not too misleading.)
ExtonGuy t1_iudxths wrote
Reply to If the Milky Way is located in the middle of a void, does this explain why we see no aliens? by [deleted]
No, we are not in a void. The Milky Way is part of the local group of galaxies, which is part of the Virgo supercluster of galaxies.
ExtonGuy t1_iucws7k wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I have a question about why a black hole’s gravity is more than it was when it was a star (detailed question in description) by [deleted]
Same “amount” of gravity in less space, close to the BH. if you were the same distance above the star and the BH, you would feel the same force. But with a BH, you can get 100 km (for example) from the center and still be outside the BH. With a star, if you were 100 km from the center you would be deep inside.
ExtonGuy t1_iua8rg1 wrote
Reply to comment by clusterlizard99 in Potentially a dumb question about the centre of our galaxy. by Ok-Internet7999
No, we can’t photograph the Hawking radiation. It’s much (much!) to weak. What we can see is the accretion ring around the BH, which is very hot and glowing.
ExtonGuy t1_itl2aym wrote
It’s kind of like measuring a room from north to south and getting 20 feet, but from south to north it’s 20 feet 1 inch. And now we’re even more sure about that 1 inch difference.
ExtonGuy t1_ispy79c wrote
Reply to comment by GarunixReborn in Do 2 objects on opposite "ends" of the universe pull on each other to some extremely minute degree? by Courcy6185
The force of the MOON on you is not equal to the force of the EARTH on you, that much is true. But the force of the moon on you is equal to the force of you on the moon. For any two bodies X and Y, the gravitation force of X on Y is equal to the force of Y on X.
ExtonGuy t1_isnzn9h wrote
Reply to comment by GarunixReborn in Do 2 objects on opposite "ends" of the universe pull on each other to some extremely minute degree? by Courcy6185
You fall faster on Earth because the force is 6 times more than on the Moon. They don't accelerate at 6 m/s^(2), because even thought they feel the same force you do, they are many billion of times more massive.
Acceleration = Force / Mass
On Earth, your acceleration is 9.81 m/s^(2). Earth's acceleration toward you is 8.21 x 10^(-23) m/s^(2).
ExtonGuy t1_islave3 wrote
Reply to comment by GarunixReborn in Do 2 objects on opposite "ends" of the universe pull on each other to some extremely minute degree? by Courcy6185
The forces are equal. The responses to the forces are unequal.
ExtonGuy t1_isjzraz wrote
Reply to comment by Grombrindal18 in Do 2 objects on opposite "ends" of the universe pull on each other to some extremely minute degree? by Courcy6185
M87 is pulling on you exactly as much as you pull on M87. The forces are equal and opposite, at about 1 x 10^(-24) N. Which is super small.
EDIT: if there were no other forces involved (like Earth's gravity), that much force would move you about 0.1 micrometers in 100 years. For comparison, a red blood cell is 7 micrometers diameter.
ExtonGuy t1_irblbd5 wrote
Reply to comment by Shotgunliver in Michigan State Police reports 'active shooting scene' in Dearborn, tells people to 'stay away' by jlaux
- Las Vagas (stabbings), DC, Dearborn ...
ExtonGuy t1_irbl7co wrote
Reply to Michigan State Police reports 'active shooting scene' in Dearborn, tells people to 'stay away' by jlaux
In a few weeks, we're going to have a 24-hour "active shooting" channel. Plus knife stabbings, of course.
ExtonGuy t1_iqqt1fh wrote
This type of analysis had been done for years. https://www.amazon.com/Historical-Eclipses-Rotation-Richard-Stephenson/dp/0521461944 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspa.2016.0404
ExtonGuy t1_ixja21m wrote
Reply to Lopsided star cluster may disprove Newton and Einstein, controversial new study claims. An uneven distribution of stars in several nearby clusters may offer evidence of MOND — a controversial theory of gravity that disputes Newton and rejects the existence of dark matter. by nimobo
Yeah, just like when I cross-threaded one (1) bolt on a car I was rebuilding. Completely disproved my theory of how to build a car.