Gurf durf, look Ma I'm posting.

Khitler.

The comparison here would be you not wanting the Quran taught in schools because kids are easily confused and not mature enough to choose their own religion. Yet undoubtedly both Muslim and trans students exist.

Here's the law you're railing against.

"An Act concerning diversity and inclusion instruction in school districts and supplementing chapter 35 of Title 18A of the New Jersey Statutes.

Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

C.18A:35-4.36a Curriculum to include instruction on diversity and inclusion.

1. a. Beginning in the 2021-2022 school year, each school district shall incorporate instruction on diversity and inclusion in an appropriate place in the curriculum of students in grades kindergarten through 12 as part of the district’s implementation of the New Jersey Student Learning Standards.
   b. The instruction shall:
   (1) highlight and promote diversity, including economic diversity, equity, inclusion, tolerance, and belonging in connection with gender and sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, disabilities, and religious tolerance;
   (2) examine the impact that unconscious bias and economic disparities have at both an individual level and on society as a whole; and
   (3) encourage safe, welcoming, and inclusive environments for all students regardless of race or ethnicity, sexual and gender identities, mental and physical disabilities, and religious beliefs.
   c. The Commissioner of Education shall provide school districts with sample learning activities and resources designed to promote diversity and inclusion."

Well I absolutely don't believe that's happening on a level or scale you believe it is.
Furthermore schools should be accepting of all kids regardless of any defining characteristics and not blamed for their existence.

So you don't have time to answer about lefrak.

You're backed by the Lefrak organizations superPAC FairerNJ.
How do you square your commitment to education while being funded by a company that took Jersey City to court in order to avoid paying the 1% payroll tax that was supposed to cover the loss in state funding?
Do you agree with Fulop that the companies that have not paid the tax should be exempt from interest on their debt, as opposed to homeowners unable to meet these increases?