IamSauerKraut

IamSauerKraut t1_ivhgdsj wrote

  1. Many polls will have two types of "workers" inside: those who are the actual poll workers in charge of the location and process. They are NOT volunteers. The volunteers who may be there are poll watchers. They tend to be from political parties and are there to watch/observe, and in the rare case, question what is going on with a particular voter who is being denied the ability to vote.
  2. Agreed.
  3. Poll workers should not be answering questions or engaging in conversation re candidates.
  4. Same comment as 3.
  5. yep. Don't give the poll workers crap about it, either.
  6. Right.
  7. Ask the poll workers, not the poll watchers.
  8. Right.
  9. This needs to be said?
  10. Do not block the entrance to the polling place!
  11. Patience is a virtue.
  12. This needs to be said? Wear what you want when going to vote but try not to be a jerk about it.
3

IamSauerKraut t1_ivdgtgo wrote

Digliulio is not much different than the other two. They want no state services for anyone, no public education, no state police agencies, etc., etc. Freedom only as they define it, not as it is. Being "green" is not much different from the theories the other two follow: do as I say, not as I do.

Not better than Shapiro.

3

IamSauerKraut t1_ivawbxt wrote

>So they can be an obstacle towards progress, but they really are pretty worthless overall

Although my personal view is that cannabis is the poster child for "special interest" legislation, PA GQP legislators have long been worthless with their refusal to allow bipartisan legislation leave committee. I'd like to say MastriaNO is the most useless legislator in Hbg, but he has lots of competition there.

2